Abstract
This study was designed to determine whether memory for stimulus values is a Bayesian weighting of the magnitude of a stimulus and the central tendency of an exemplar’s category (Huttenlocher, Hedges, & Vevea, 2000). In five experiments, participants reproduced the remembered size of a geometric figure drawn from one of two categories whose means for size differed. Reproductions were biased toward the mean of the combined distribution rather than the mean of either category. Reproductions were also influenced by the size of the stimulus on the preceding trial. Neither of these results is entirely consistent with the view that recollections are partially constructed from a consideration of the long-run probabilities established by category membership.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bartlett, F. C. (1932).Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. London: Cambridge University Press.
DeCarlo, L. T. (1992). Intertrial interval and sequential effects in magnitude scaling.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,18, 1080–1088.
Estes, W. K. (1997). Processes of memory loss, recovery, and distortion.Psychological Review,104, 148–169.
Hellström, Å. (1985). The time-order error and its relatives: Mirrors of kcognitive processes in comparing.Psychological Bulletin,97, 35–61.
Helson, H. (1964).Adaptation-level theory. New York: Harper & Row.
Hollingworth, H. L. (1910). The central tendency of judgment.Journal of Philosophy, Psychology, & Scientific Method,7, 461–469.
Huttenlocher, J., &Hedges, L. V. (1992). Reconstructing the past: Category effects in estimation. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 28, pp. 251–280). Orlando, FL: Academi Press.
Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., &Duncan, S. (1991). Categories and particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location.Psychological Review,98, 352–376.
Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. [V.], Engebretson, P. H., & Vevea, J. (1995, November).Reconstructing experiences from memory: The effects of categories. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Los Angeles.
Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., &Vevea, J. L. (2000). Why do categories affect stimulus judgment?Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 220–241.
Jones, C. M. M., &Heit, E. (1993). An evaluation of the total similarity principle: Effects of similarity on frequency judgments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,19, 799–812.
Kerst, S. M., &Howard, J. H. (1978). Memory psychophysics for visual area and length.Memory & Cognition,6, 327–335.
King, M. C., &Lockhead, G. R. (1981). Response scales and sequential effects in judgment.Perception & Psychophysics,30, 599–603.
Loftus, G. R., &Masson, M. E. J. (1994). Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,1, 476–490.
Marks, L. E. (1988). Magnitude estimation and sensory matching.Perception & Psychophysics,43, 511–525.
Marks, L. E. (1992). The slippery context effect in psychophysics: Intensive, extensive, and qualitative continua.Perception & Psychophysics,51, 187–198.
Marks, L. E. (1993). Contextual processing of multidimensional and unidimensional auditory stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,19, 227–249.
Medin, D. L., &Schaffer, M. M. (1978). Context theory of classification learning.Psychological Review,85, 207–238.
Moyer, R. S., Bradley, D. R., Sorensen, M. H., Whiting, J. C., &Mansfield, D. P. (1978). Psychophysical functions for perceived and remembered size.Science,200, 330–332.
Needham, J. G. (1935). The effect of the time interval upon the timeerror at different intensive levels.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 539–543.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1991). Tests of an exemplar model for relating perceptual classification and recognition memory.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,17, 3–27.
Poulton, E. C. (1979). Models for biases in judging sensory magnitude.Psychological Bulletin,86, 777–803.
Rosch, E., &Mervis, C. B. (1975). Family resemblance studies in the internal structure of categories.Cognitive Psychology,7, 573–605.
Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., &Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories.Cognitive Psychology,8, 382–439.
Schneider, B., &Parker, S. (1990). Does stimulus context affect loudness or only loudness judgment?Perception & Psychophysics,48, 409–418.
Staddon, J. E. R., King, M., &Lockhead, G. R. (1980). On sequential effects in absolute judgment experiments.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,6, 290–301.
Wedell, D. H. (1995). Contrast effects in paired comparisons: Evidence for both stimulus-based and response-based processes.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,21, 1158–1173.
Wedell, D. H. (1996). A constructive-associative model of contextual dependence of unidimensional similarity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,22, 634–661.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Preparation of this article was supported by NIH Grant GM08225.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sailor, K.M., Antoine, M. Is memory for stimulus magnitude Bayesian?. Memory & Cognition 33, 840–851 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193079
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193079