Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
  • Log in
  1. Home
  2. Memory & Cognition
  3. Article
Wishful thinking and source monitoring
Download PDF
Your article has downloaded

Similar articles being viewed by others

Slider with three articles shown per slide. Use the Previous and Next buttons to navigate the slides or the slide controller buttons at the end to navigate through each slide.

Remedying the Metamemory Expectancy Illusion in Source Monitoring: Are there Effects on Restudy Choices and Source Memory?

10 August 2022

Marie Luisa Schaper, Ute J. Bayen & Carolin V. Hey

Is knowledge reliance in source guessing a cognitive trait? Examining stability across time and domain

07 January 2020

Liliane Wulff & Beatrice G. Kuhlmann

Source memory for advertisements: The role of advertising message credibility

31 July 2020

Raoul Bell, Laura Mieth & Axel Buchner

Responsible remembering and forgetting as contributors to memory for important information

20 January 2021

Dillon H. Murphy & Alan D. Castel

Experience-based knowledge increases confidence in discriminating our memories

26 September 2018

Ewelina Cichoń, Łukasz Gawęda, … Remigiusz Szczepanowski

Coping with high advertising exposure: a source-monitoring perspective

05 September 2022

Raoul Bell, Laura Mieth & Axel Buchner

Memories people no longer believe in can still affect them in helpful and harmful ways

14 June 2022

Ryan Burnell, Robert A. Nash, … Maryanne Garry

Memory and truth: correcting errors with true feedback versus overwriting correct answers with errors

13 February 2019

Janet Metcalfe & Teal S. Eich

Eyewitnesses’ Pre-lineup Memory Strength Inferences Can Influence Identification Decisions

11 June 2021

Neil Brewer, Tick Zweck, … Matthew Guidolin

Download PDF
  • Published: April 2005

Wishful thinking and source monitoring

  • Ruthanna Gordon1,
  • Nancy Franklin2 &
  • Jennifer Beck2 

Memory & Cognition volume 33, pages 418–429 (2005)Cite this article

  • 1364 Accesses

  • 26 Citations

  • 26 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

Memory distortions sometimes serve a purpose: It may be in our interest to misremember some details of an event or to forget others altogether. The present work examines whether a similar phenomenon occurs for source attribution. Given that the source of a memory provides information about the accuracy of its content, people may be biased toward source attributions that are consistent with desired accuracy. In Experiment 1, participants read desirable and undesirable predictions made by sources differing in their a priori reliability and showed awishful thinking bias—that is, a bias to attribute desirable predictions to the reliable source and undesirable predictions to the unreliable source. Experiment 2 showed that this wishful thinking effect depends on retrieval processes. Experiment 3 showed that under some circumstances, wishes concerning one event can produce systematic source memory errors for others.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

References

  • Allport, G. W., &Postman, L. J. (1945). The basic psychology of rumor.Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences,8, 61–81.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bahrick, H. P., Hall, L. K., &Berger, S. A. (1996). Accuracy and distortion in memory for high school grades.Psychological Science,7, 265–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentall, R. P. (1990). The illusion of reality: A review and integration of psychological research on hallucinations.Psychological Bulletin, 107, 82–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boon, J., &Davies, G. (1996). Extra-stimulus influences on eyewitness perception and recall: Hastorf and Cantril revisited.Legal & Criminological Psychology,1, 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., &Hicks, J. L. (2003). Halo and devil effects demonstrate valenced-based influences on source-monitoring decisions.Consciousness & Cognition,12, 257–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dellarosa, D., &Bourne, L. E. (1984). Decisions and memory: Differential retrievability of consistent and contradictory evidence.Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior,23, 669–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditto, P. H., Jemmott, J. B., &Darley, J. M. (1988). Appraising the threat of illness: A mental representational approach.Health Psychology, 7, 183–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, E. (1981). Whodunit? Memory for evidence in text.American Journal of Psychology,94, 479–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal history.American Psychologist,35, 603–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hautus, M. J. (1995). Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values ofd′.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,27, 46–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intraub, H., &Hoffman, J. E. (1992). Reading and visual memory: Remembering scenes that were never seen.American Journal of Psychology, 105, 101–114.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., &Leach, K. (1988). The consequences for memory of imagining in another person’s voice.Memory & Cognition, 16, 337–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., &Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., &Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring.Psychological Bulletin,114, 3–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., Nolde, S. F., &De Leonardis, D. M. (1996). Emotional focus and source monitoring.Journal of Memory & Language,35, 135–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. K., &Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring.Psychological Review,88, 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, T. L., &Johnson, M. K. (1992). Self effects in memory for person information.Social Cognition,10, 30–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning.Psychological Bulletin,108, 480–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Macmillan, N. A., &Creelman, C. D. (2004).Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, R. L., Landau, J. D., &Hicks, J. L. (1997). Contributions of inadequate source monitoring to unconscious plagiarism during idea generation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 886–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, M., &Johnson, M. K. (2000). Choice-supportive source monitoring: Do our decisions seem better to us as we age?Psychology & Aging,15, 596–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, M., Shafir, E., &Johnson, M. K. (2000). Misremembrance of options past: Source monitoring and choice.Psychological Science, 11, 132–138.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, M., Shafir, E., &Johnson, M. K. (2003). Remembering chosen and assigned options.Memory & Cognition,31, 422–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. (1996). The sampling distribution ofd′.Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 65–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A., &Haddock, G. (1997). Cognitive factors in source monitoring and auditory hallucinations.Psychological Medicine,27, 669–679.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perloff, L. S., &Fetzer, B. K. (1986). Self—other judgments and perceived vulnerability to victimization.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,50, 502–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, D. A., Gerrig, R. J., &Bailis, D. S. (1997). What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 416–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, T. B., Kuiper, N. A., &Kirker, W. S. (1977). Self-reference and the encoding of personal information.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,35, 677–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, M., McFarland, C., &Fletcher, G. J. (1981). The effect of attitude on the recall of personal histories.Journal of Personality & Social Psychology,40, 627–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, J. W., &Bessenoff, G. R. (1999). Stereotypes as sourcemonitoring cues: On the interaction between episodic and semantic memory.Psychological Science,10, 106–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. E. (1989).Positive illusions: Creative self-deception and the healthy mind. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Viscusi, K. (1992).Smoking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, N. D., &Klein, W. M. (1996). Unrealistic optimism: Present and future.Journal of Social & Clinical Psychology,15, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woike, B., &Polo, M. (2001). Motive-related memories: Content, structure, and affect.Journal of Personality,69, 391–415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Illinois Institute of Technology, Institute of Psychology, 3101 South Dearborn, Suite 252, 60616-3793, Chicago, IL

    Ruthanna Gordon

  2. Department of Psychology, State University of New York, 11794-2500, Stony Brook, NY

    Nancy Franklin & Jennifer Beck

Authors
  1. Ruthanna Gordon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nancy Franklin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jennifer Beck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Ruthanna Gordon or Nancy Franklin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gordon, R., Franklin, N. & Beck, J. Wishful thinking and source monitoring. Memory & Cognition 33, 418–429 (2005). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193060

Download citation

  • Received: 20 June 2003

  • Accepted: 14 July 2004

  • Issue Date: April 2005

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193060

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Source Memory
  • Wishful Thinking
  • Source Monitoring
  • Encode Condition
  • Source Accuracy
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the most common mistakes and prepare your manuscript for journal editors.

Learn more

Advertisement

Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips

Switch Edition
  • Academic Edition
  • Corporate Edition
  • Home
  • Impressum
  • Legal information
  • Privacy statement
  • California Privacy Statement
  • How we use cookies
  • Manage cookies/Do not sell my data
  • Accessibility
  • FAQ
  • Contact us
  • Affiliate program

Not logged in - 3.236.209.138

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Part of Springer Nature.