Abstract
In Experiment 1, pigeons were trained with a 1-sec dark and a 1-sec houselight-illuminated delay interval to discriminate between sequences of two and four flashes of light (feeder illumination). The sequences could be discriminated on the basis of the number of flashes, the number of gaps, or the duration of the gap between flashes. A choose-few bias was obtained at extended dark delays, but not at extended illuminated delays. Pigeons appeared to confuse long dark delays with the longer gap between flashes on few-sample trials. In Experiment 2, additional sample sequences were included that made gap duration an unreliable cue for discriminating between the few and many samples. A significant choose-many bias was obtained at extended dark delay intervals, but no biased forgetting was found at extended illuminated delays. The pigeons appeared to discriminate light flash sequences by relying on multiple temporal features of a sequence rather than using an event switch to count flashes. The biased-forgetting effects observed appear to be due to instructional ambiguity that results from the similarity of the delay interval to features of the flash sequences. nt]mis|This research was supported by Grant OGPOOD6378 from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada to A.S.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Dorrance, B. R., Kaiser, D. H., &Zentall, T. R. (2000). Event-duration discrimination by pigeons: The choose-short effect may result from retention-test novelty.Animal Learning & Behavior,28, 344–353.
Fetterman, J. G. (1995). The psychophysics of remembered duration.Animal Learning & Behavior,23, 49–62.
Fetterman, J. G. (2000). Biases in pigeon working memory.Animal Learning & Behavior,28, 68–79.
Fetterman, J. G., &MacEwen, D. (1989). Short-term memory for responses: The “choose-small” effect.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,52, 311–324.
Gaitan, S. C., &Wixted, J. T. (2000). The role of “nothing” in memory for event duration in pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior,28, 147–161.
Grant, D. S. (1993). Coding processes in pigeons. In T. R. Zentall (Ed.), Animal cognition: A tribute to Donald A. Riley (pp. 193–216). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Grant, D. S. (2006). Training delays reduce the choose-short effect with keylight duration samples in pigeons.Behavioural Processes,72, 139–148.
Grant, D. S., &Kelly, R. (1996). The role of minimum wait time and sample discriminability in the coding of event duration in pigeons.Learning & Motivation,27, 243–259.
Grant, D. S., &Kelly, R. (1998). The effect of variable-delay training on coding of event duration in pigeons.Learning & Motivation,29, 49–67.
Grant, D. S., &Spetch, M. L. (1991). Pigeons’ memory for event duration: Differences between choice and successive matching tasks.Learning & Motivation,22, 180–199.
Grant, D. S., &Spetch, M. L. (1993). Analogical and nonanalogical coding of samples differing in duration in a choice-matching task in pigeons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,19, 15–25.
Grant, D. S., &Spetch, M. L. (1994). The role of asymmetrical coding of duration samples in producing the choose-short effect in pigeons.Learning & Motivation,25, 413–430.
Grant, D. S., Spetch, M. L., &Kelly, R. (1997). Pigeons’ coding of event duration in delayed matching-to-sample. In C. M. Bradshaw & E. Szabadi (Eds.),Time and behaviour: Psychological and neurobehavioural analyses (pp. 217–264). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Hope, C., &Santi, A. (2004). Pigeons’ memory for number of events: Effects of intertrial interval and delay interval illumination.Learning & Motivation,35, 348–370.
Kelly, R., &Spetch, M. L. (2000). Choice biases in delayed matchingto-sample duration with pigeons: Manipulations of ITI and delay illumination.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,53B, 309–323.
Kraemer, P. J., Mazmanian, D. S., &Roberts, W. A. (1985). The choose-short effect in pigeon memory for stimulus duration: Subjective shortening versus coding models.Animal Learning & Behavior,13, 349–354.
Meck, W. H., &Church, R. M. (1983). A mode control model of counting and timing process.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,9, 320–334.
Roberts, W. A., Macuda, T., &Brodbeck, D. R. (1995). Memory for number of light flashes in the pigeon.Animal Learning & Behavior,23, 182–188.
Roberts, W. A., &Mitchell, S. (1994). Can a pigeon simultaneously process temporal and numerical information?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,20, 66–78.
Santi, A., Bridson, S., &Ducharme, M. J. (1993). Memory codes for temporal and nontemporal samples in many-to-one matching by pigeons.Animal Learning & Behavior,21, 120–130.
Santi, A., Ducharme, M. J., &Bridson, S. (1992). Differential outcome expectancies and memory for temporal and nontemporal stimuli in pigeons.Learning & Motivation,23, 156–169.
Santi, A., &Hope, C. (2001). Errors in pigeons’ memory for number of events.Animal Learning & Behavior,29, 208–220.
Santi, A., Lellwitz, J., &Gagne, S. (2006). Pigeons’ memory for sequences of light flashes: Reliance on temporal properties and evidence for delay interval/gap confusion.Behavioural Processes,72, 128–138.
Sherburne, L. M., Zentall, T. R., &Kaiser, D. H. (1998). Timing in pigeons: The choose-short effect may result from pigeons’ “confusion” between delay and intertrial intervals.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,5, 516–522.
Spetch, M. L. (1987). Systematic errors in pigeons’ memory for event duration: Interaction between training and test delay.Animal Learning & Behavior,15, 1–5.
Spetch, M. L., &Rusak, B. (1989). Pigeons’ memory for event duration: Intertrial interval and delay effects.Animal Learning & Behavior,17, 147–156.
Spetch, M. L., &Rusak, B. (1992). Temporal context effects in pigeons’ memory for event duration.Learning & Motivation,23, 117–144.
Spetch, M. L., &Wilkie, D. M. (1983). Subjective shortening: A model of pigeons’ memory for event durations.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,9, 14–30.
Zentall, T. R. (1997). Animal memory: The role of “instructions.”Learning & Motivation,28, 280–308.
Zentall, T. R. (1999). Support for a theory of memory for event duration must distinguish between test trial ambiguity and actual memory loss.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior,72, 467–472.
Zentall, T. R. (2005). Timing, memory for intervals, and memory for untimed stimuli: The role of instructional ambiguity.Behavioural Processes,70, 209–222.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Keough, D., Santi, A. & Van Rooyen, P. Pigeons’ memory for sequences of light flashes when gap duration is an unreliable discriminative cue. Learning & Behavior 35, 115–122 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193046
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193046