Abstract
Hearing loss is a confounding variable that is rarely addressed in behavioral research despite its prevalence across the life span. Currently, the most common method of experimental control over hearing acuity is through self report of perceived impairment. We argue that this technique may lack sensitivity and that researchers should more commonly utilize standardized hearing screening procedures. Distinctive patterns of hearing loss are reviewed with attention to populations that commonly participate in behavioral research. We explain standard techniques for conducting pure tone hearing screening using a conventional portable audiometer and outline a procedure for how researchers can modify a conventional laptop computer for audiometric screening when a standard audiometer is unavailable. We offer a sample hearing screening program that researchers may use toward the development of their own protocol. This program is freely available for download at www psychonomic.org/archive.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American National Standards Institute (1996). Specification for Audiometers. ANSI, S3. 6–1996, New York: Author.
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (1996). Guidelines for audiologic screening. Rockville, MD: Author.
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (1996).Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer (Version 3.4, Report 132). University of Amsterdam, Institute of Phonetic Sciences.
Brant, L. J., &Fozard, J. L. (1990). Age changes in pure-tone hearing thresholds in a longitudinal study of normal human aging.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,88, 813–820.
Brumback, C. R., Low, K. A., Gratton, G, &Fabiani, M. (2005). Putting things into perspective: Individual differences in workingmemory span and the integration of information.Experimental Psychology,52, 21–30.
Burk, M. H., &Wiley, T. L. (2004). Continuous versus pulsed tones in audiometry.American Journal of Audiology,13, 54–61.
Cohen, J. D., Macwhinney, B., Flatt, M., &Provost, J. (1993). PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers.Behavior Research: Methods, Instruments, & Computers,25, 257–271.
Conway, C. M., &Christiansen, M. H. (2005). Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition31, 24–39.
Corso, J. F. (1963). Age and sex differences in pure-tone thresholds.Arch Otolaryngologica,77, 385–405.
Davis, M. H., Johnsrude, I. S., Hervais-Adelman, A., Taylor, K., &Mcgettigan, C. (2005). Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: Evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,134, 222–241.
Erdman, S. A. (1994). Self-assessment: From research focus to research tool.Journal of the Academy of Rehabilitative Audiology Monographs,27, 67–90.
Gates, G. A., Cooper, J. C, Kannel, W. B., &Miller, N. J. (1990). Hearing in the elderly: The Framingham cohort: Part 1. Basic audiometric test results.Ear Hear,11,247–256.
Goldstein, J. M., Jerram, M., Poldrack, R., Anagnoson, R., Breiter, H. C., Makris, N., et al. (2005). Sex differences in prefrontal cortical brain activity during fMRI of auditory verbal working memory.Neuropsychology,19, 509–519.
Hall, J., &Mueller, G. (1997).Audiologist desk reference. San Diego: Singular.
Hughes, R. W., Jones, D. M. (2005). The impact of order incongruence between a task-irrelevant auditory sequence and a task-relevant visual sequence.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,31, 316–327.
Hughes, R. W., Vachon, F., &Jones, D. M. (2005). Auditory attentional capture during serial recall: Violations at encoding of an algorithmbased neural model?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition,31, 736–749.
Johnstone, S. J., Pleffer, C. B., Barry, R. J., Clarke, A. R., &Smith, J. L. (2005). Development of inhibitory processing during the go/no-go task: A behavioral and event-related potenti al study of children and adults.Journal of Psychophysiology,19, 11–23.
Katz, J. (2002).Handbook of clinical audiology (5th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Kochkin, S. (2005). MarkeTrak VII: Hearing loss population tops 31 million people.Hearing Review,12, 16–29.
Kryter, K. D. (1983). Presbycusis, sociocusis and nosocusis.Journal of the Acoustical Society of America,73, 254–258.
Martin, F. N., &Clark, J. G. (2006).Introduction to audiology (9th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Moore, A. B., Bondi, M. W., Salmon, D. P., &Murphy, C. (2005). Eyeblink classical conditioning to auditory and olfactory stimuli: Performance among older adults with and without the apolipoprotein E e4 allele.Neuropsychology,19, 437–445.
Moscicki, E. K.,Elkins, E. F., Baum, H. M., &Mcnamara, P. M. (1985). Hearing loss in the elderly: An epidemiological study of the Framingham heart study cohort.Ear Hear,6, 184–190.
Nadol, J. (1993). Hearing loss.New England Journal of Medicine,329, 1092–1102.
Nch Pure Tone Generator. Accessed December 1, 2005. Available at www.nch.com.au/tonegen.
Newby, H. A., &Popelka, G. R. (1992).Audiology (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Remijn, G. B., &Nakajima, Y. (2005). The perceptual integration of auditory stimulus edges: An illusory short tone in stimulus patterns of consisting of two partly overlapping glides.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,31, 183–192.
Robinson, D. W. (1988). Threshold of hearing as a function of age and sex for the typical unscreened population.British Journal of Audiology,22, 5–20.
Robinson, D. W., &Sutton, G. J. (1979). Age effect in hearing: A comparative analysis of published threshold data.Audiology,18, 320–304.
Schneider, W., Eschmann, A., &Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime Reference Guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools.
Schriefers, H., Jescheniak, J. D., &Hantsch, A. (2005). Selection of gender-marked morphemes in speech production.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,31, 159–168.
Spoor, A. (1967). Presbycusis values in relation to noise induced hearing loss.International Journal of Audiology,6, 48–57.
TUrner, C. W., &Cummings, K J. (1999) Speech audibility for listen-ers with high-frequency hearing loss.American Journal of Audiology,8, 47–56.
Wingfield, A., Tun, P. A., &Mccoy, S. L. (2005). Hearing loss in older adulthood: What it is and how it interacts with cognitive performance.Current Directions in Psychological Science,14, 144–148.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported in part by NIH/NRSA Postdoctoral Training Grant AG00255 awarded to the first author from the National Institute of Aging. We also acknowledge support from Grant R01 AG19714 from the National Institute of Aging. We are grateful for the assistance of Kevin Frank, Joseph Donaher, and the audiology departments of the Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and Mercy Fitzgerald Hospital.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reilly, J., Troiani, V., Grossman, M. et al. An introduction to hearing loss and screening procedures for behavioral research. Behavior Research Methods 39, 667–672 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193038
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193038