The English Lexicon Project

Abstract

The English Lexicon Project is a multiuniversity effort to provide a standardized behavioral and descriptive data set for 40,481 words and 40,481 nonwords. It is available via the Internet at elexicon.wustl.edu. Data from 816 participants across six universities were collected in a lexical decision task (approximately 3400 responses per participant), and data from 444 participants were collected in a speeded naming task (approximately 2500 responses per participant). The present paper describes the motivation for this project, the methods used to collect the data, and the search engine that affords access to the behavioral measures and descriptive lexical statistics for these stimuli.

References

  1. Andrews, S. (1997). The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,4, 439–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ans, B., Carbonnel, S., &Valdois, S. (1998). A connectionist multitrace memory model of polysyllabic word reading.Psychological Review,105, 678–723.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., &van Rijn, H. (1993).The CELEX lexical database. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pennsylvania.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,10, 340–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Balota, D. A., &Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production?Journal of Memory & Language,24, 89–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., &Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,133, 283–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Balota, D. A., &Spieler, D. H. (1998). The utility of item-level analyses in model evaluation: A reply to Seidenberg and Plaut.Psychological Science,9, 238–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Besner, D., & Bourassa, D. C. (1995, June).Localist and parallel processing models of visual word recognition: A few more words. Paper presented at the Brain Behavior, and Cognitive Science Society, Halifax, CA.

  9. Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects.Mind,11, 63–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Centre for Speech Technology Research, University of Edinburgh. (n.d.).Unisyn lexicon [Data file]. Retrieved July 19, 2004, from www.cstr.ed.ac.uk/projects/unisyn/.

  11. Chateau, D., &Jared, D. (2003). Spelling-sound consistency effects in disyllabic word naming.Journal of Memory & Language,48, 255–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J., &Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.),Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., &Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud.Psychological Review,108, 204–256.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cutler, A. (1981). Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we be able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990?Cognition,10, 65–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Faust, M. E., Balota, D. A., Spieler, D. H., &Ferraro, F. R. (1999). Individual differences in information-processing rate and amount: Implications for group differences in response latency.Psychological Bulletin,125, 777–799.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Forster, K. I. (2000). The potential for experimenter bias effects in word recognition experiments.Memory & Cognition,28, 1109–1115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Grainger, J., &Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model.Psychological Review,103, 518–565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Horne, J. A., &Ostberg, O. (1976). A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness—eveningness in human circadian rhythms.International Journal of Chronobiology,4, 97–110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jared, D., McRae, K., &Seidenberg, M. S. (1990). The basis of consistency effects in word naming.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 687–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Keefe, D. E., &Neely, J. H. (1990). Semantic priming in the pronunciation task: The role of prospective prime-generated expectancies.Memory & Cognition,18, 289–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kello, C. T. (2006). Considering the junction model of lexical processing. In S. Andrews (Ed.),From inkmarks to ideas: Current issues in lexical processing (pp. 50–75). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kessler, B., Treiman, R., &Mullennix, J. (2002). Phonetic biases in voice key response time measurements.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 145–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kučera, H., &Francis, W. (1967).Computational analysis of presentday American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lund, K., &Burgess, C. (1996) Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,28, 203–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McClelland, J. L., &Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings.Psychological Review,88, 375–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited-capacity attention.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,106, 226–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Neely, J. H., Keefe, D. E., &Ross, K. L. (1989). Semantic priming in the lexical decision task: Roles of prospective prime-generated expectancies and retrospective semantic matching.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,15, 1003–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. New, B., Ferrand, L., Pallier, C., &Brysbaert, M. (2006). Reexamining word length effects in visual word recognition: New evidence from the English Lexicon Project.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,13, 45–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Petersen, S. E., Fox, P. T., Posner, M. I., Mintun, M., &Raichle, M. E. (1989). Positron emission tomographic studies of the processing of single words.Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience,1, 153–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S., &Patterson, K. (1996). Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains.Psychological Review,103, 56–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Seidenberg, M. S., &McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed developmental model of word recognition and naming.Psychological Review,96, 523–568.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Seidenberg, M. S., & Waters, G. S. (1989, November).Naming words aloud: A mega-study. Paper presented at the meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Atlanta, GA.

  33. Shipley, W. C. (1940). A self-administering scale for measuring intellectual impairment and deterioration.Journal of Psychology,9, 371–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Spieler, D. H., &Balota, D. A. (1997). Bringing computational models of word naming down to the item level.Psychological Science,8, 411–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions.Journal of Experimental Psychology,18, 643–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Taraban, R., &McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation.Journal of Memory & Language,26, 608–631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., &Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,124, 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zevin, J. D., &Seidenberg, M. S. (2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., &Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual-process model.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance,24, 1131–1161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David A. Balota.

Additional information

This research was supported by Grant AGO3991 from the Nation Institute on Aging and by Grant BCS 0001801 from the National Science Foundation

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Balota, D.A., Yap, M.J., Hutchison, K.A. et al. The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods 39, 445–459 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193014

Download citation

Keywords

  • Word Recognition
  • Lexical Decision
  • Lexical Decision Task
  • Visual Word Recognition
  • Lexical Processing