Abstract
Groups of young and old adults were trained for four sessions on a set of 24 alphabet-arithmetic problems. Problem sets were either highly confusable or highly distinct. Power-function and mixture-model fits to the means and standard deviations of the acquisition data, resolved at the participant problem level, were compared. “Shallow” power functions signaled that a problem was computed throughout training; “humped” mixture functions signaled a shift from slow computed solutions to fast retrieved solutions. Not surprisingly, shifts to retrieval occurred later for confusable problems, but there were also fewer shifts in that condition. Failures to shift, even after extended practice, suggest that retrieving problem solutions is an elective strategy, and not an automatic concomitant of skill training. Participants can be viewed as choosing between strategies that trade off benefits in speed against costs in accuracy. Older adults showed few retrieval solutions in either condition, perhaps because of their emphasis on accuracy.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerman, P. L., &Woltz, D. J. (1994). Determinants of learning and performance in an associative memory/substitution task: Task constraints, individual differences, volition, and motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology,86, 487–515.
Anderson, R. B. (2001). The power law as an emergent property.Memory & Cognition,29, 1061–1068.
Atkinson, R. C., Bower, G. H., &Crothers, E. J. (1965).Introduction to mathematical learning theory. Oxford: Wiley.
Cerella, J., & Hoyer, W. J. (2001), November).Cognitive skill learning: Races, mixtures, and humps in the power law. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL.
Cerella, J., Onyper, S. V., &Hoyer, W. J. (2006). The associative-memory basis of cognitive skill learning: Adult age differences.Psychology & Aging,21, 483–498.
Delaney, P. F., Reder, L. M., Staszewski, J. J., &Ritter, F. E. (1998). The strategy-specific nature of improvement: The power law applies by strategy within task.Psychological Science,9, 1–7.
Ekstrom, R. B., French, J. W., Harman, H. H., &Dermen, D. (1976).Manual for kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
Haider, H., &Frensch, P. A. (2002). Why aggregated learning follows the power law of practice when individual learning does not.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,28, 392–406.
Haider, H., Frensch, P. A., &Joram, D. (2005). Are strategy shifts caused by data-driven processes or by voluntary processes?Consciousness & Cognition,14, 495–519.
Heathcote, A., Brown, S., &Mewhort, D. J. K. (2000). The power law repealed: The case for an exponential law of practice.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 185–207.
Hoyer, W. J., Cerella, J., &Onyper, S. V. (2003). Item learning in cognitive skill training: Effects of item difficulty.Memory & Cognition,31, 1260–1270.
Kirk, E. P., &Ashcraft, M. H. (2001). Telling stories: The perils and promise of using verbal reports to study math strategies.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,27, 157–175.
Lemaire, P., Arnaud, L., &Lecacheur, M. (2004). Adults’ age-related differences in adaptivity of strategy choices: Evidence from computational estimation.Psychology & Aging,19, 467–481.
Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization.Psychological Review,95, 492–527.
Logan, G. D., &Klapp, S. T. (1991). Automatizing alphabet arithmetic: I. Is extended practice necessary to produce automaticity?Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,17, 179–195.
Lovett, M. C., &Anderson, J. R. (1996). History of success and current context in problem solving: Combined influences on operator selection.Cognitive Psychology,31, 168–217.
Myung, I. J., Kim, C., &Pitt, M. A. (2000). Toward an explanation of the power law artifact: Insights from response surface analysis.Memory & Cognition,28, 832–840.
Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2000). Adult age differences in memory performance: Tests of an associative deficit hypothesis.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1170–1187.
Palmeri, T. J. (1997). Exemplar similarity and the development of automaticity.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 324–354.
Palmeri, T. J. (1999). Theories of automaticity and the power law of practice.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 543–551.
Rickard, T. C. (1997). Bending the power law: A CMPL theory of strategy shifts and the automatization of cognitive skills.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 288–311.
Rickard, T. C. (2004). Strategy execution in cognitive skill learning: An item-level test of candidate models.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,30, 65–82.
Rogers, W. A., &Gilbert, D. K. (1997). Do performance strategies mediate age-related differences in associative learning?Psychology & Aging,12, 620–633.
Rogers, W. A., Hertzog, C., &Fisk, A. D. (2000). An individual differences analysis of ability and strategy influences: Age-related differences in associative learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 359–394.
Schunn, C. D., Reder, L. M., Nhouyvanisvong, A., Richards, D. R., &Stroffolino, P. J. (1997). To calculate or not to calculate: A source activation confusion model of problem familiarity’s role in strategy selection.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,23, 3–29.
Siegler, R. S., &Lemaire, P. (1997). Older and younger adults’ strategy choices in multiplication: Testing predictions of ASCM using the choice/no-choice method.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,126, 71–92.
Smith-Chant, B. L., &LeFevre, J. (2003). Doing as they are told and telling it like it is: Self-reports in mental arithmetic.Memory & Cognition,31, 516–528.
Thurstone, L. L., &Thurstone, T. G. (1949).Examiner manual for the SRA Primary Mental Abilities Test (Form 10–14). Chicago: Science Research Associates.
Touron, D. R., &Hertzog, C. (2004a). Distinguishing age differences in knowledge, strategy use, and confidence during strategic skill acquisition.Psychology & Aging,19, 452–466.
Touron, D. R., &Hertzog, C. (2004b). Strategy shift affordance and strategy choice in young and older adults.Memory & Cognition,32, 298–310.
Touron, D. R., Hoyer, W. J., &Cerella, J. (2004). Cognitive skill learning: Age-related differences in strategy shifts and speed of component operations.Psychology & Aging,19, 565–580.
Wechsler, D. (1981).Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Revised. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation.
Zbrodoff, N. J. (1995). Why is 9 + 7 harder than 2 + 3? Strength and interference as explanations of the problem-size effect.Memory & Cognition,23, 689–700.
Zbrodoff, N. J. (1999). Effects of counting in alphabet arithmetic: Opportunistic stopping and priming of intermediate steps.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,25, 299–317.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by Research Grant AG11451 to W.J.H. from the National Institute on Aging.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
White, A.S., Cerella, J. & Hoyer, W.J. Strategy transitions during cognitive skill learning in younger and older adults: Effects of interitem confusability. Mem Cogn 35, 2106–2117 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192942
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192942