Abstract
When visual recognition test items are unidentifiable—through fragmentation, for example—participants can discriminate between unidentifiable items that were presented recently and those that were not. The present study extends this recognition without identification phenomenon to the auditory modality. In several experiments, participants listened to words and were then presented with spoken recognition test items that were embedded in white noise. Participants attempted to identify each spoken word through the white noise, then rated the likelihood that the word was studied. Auditory recognition without identification was found: Participants discriminated between studied and unstudied words in the absence of an ability to identify them through white noise, even when the voice changed from male to female and when the study list was presented visually. The effect was also found when identification was hindered through the isolation of particular phonemes, suggesting that phoneme information may be present in memory traces for recently spoken words.
References
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding.Psychological Review,94, 115–147.
Clark, S. E., &Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,3, 37–60.
Cleary, A. M. (2002). Recognition with and without identification: Dissociative effects of meaningful encoding.Memory & Cognition,30, 758–767.
Cleary, A. M. (2004). Orthography, phonology, and meaning: Word features that give rise to feelings of familiarity in recognition.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 446–451.
Cleary, A. M., &Greene, R. L. (2000). Recognition without identification.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition,26, 1063–1069.
Cleary, A. M., &Greene, R. L. (2001). Memory for unidentified items: Evidence for the use of letter information in familiarity processes.Memory & Cognition,29, 540–545.
Cleary, A. M., &Greene, R. L. (2004). True and false memory in the absence of perceptual identification.Memory,12, 231–236.
Cleary, A. M., &Greene, R. L. (2005). Recognition without perceptual identification: A measure of familiarity?Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,58A, 1143–1152.
Cleary, A. M., Langley, M. M., &Seiler, K. R. (2004). Recognition without picture identification: Geons as components of the pictorial memory trace.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,11, 903–908.
Gibson, J. M., &Watkins, M. J. (1988). A pool of 1,086 words with unique two-letter fragments.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 390–397.
Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model.Psychological Review,95, 528–551.
Lloyd, M. E., Westerman, D. L., &Miller, J. M. (2007). Familiarity from orthographic information: Extensions of the recognition without identification effect.Memory & Cognition,35, 107–112.
Morris, A. L., Cleary, A. M., & Still, M. L. (2007).Electrodermal recognition without identification: When skin conductance responses show recognition of unidentified items. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory.Memory & Cognition,18, 251–269.
Nairne, J. S. (2001). A functional analysis of primary memory. In H. L. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.),The nature of remembering (pp. 283–296). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Peynircioĝlu, Z. F. (1990). A feeling-of-recognition without identification.Journal of Memory & Language,29, 493–500.
Pilotti, M., Bergman, E. T., Gallo, D. A., Sommers, M., &Roediger, H. L., III (2000). Direct comparison of auditory implicit tests.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,7, 347–353.
Roediger, H. L., III, &Blaxton, T. A. (1987). Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in wordfragment completion.Memory & Cognition,15, 379–388.
Tulving, E., &Bower, G. H. (1974). The logic of memory representations. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 265–300). New York: Academic Press.
Wallace, W. P., Shaffer, T. R., Amberg, M. D., &Silvers, V. L. (2001). Divided attention and prerecognition processing of spoken words and nonwords.Memory & Cognition,29, 1102–1110.
Warren, R. M., &Warren, R. P. (1970). Auditory illusions and confusions.Scientific American,223, 30–36.
Westerman, D. L., Lloyd, M. L., &Miller, J. M. (2002). The attribution of perceptual fluency in recognition memory: The role of expectation.Journal of Memory & Language,47, 607–617.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Some of the data reported here were collected as part of M.M.W.’s undergraduate research project for the Ronald E. McNair Scholar Program at Iowa State University under the guidance of A.M.C. The research reported here was funded by National Science Foundation Grants 0349088 and 0638486 to A.M.C.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cleary, A.M., Winfield, M.M. & Kostic, B. Auditory recognition without identification. Mem Cogn 35, 1869–1877 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192921
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192921
Keywords
- Recognition Rating
- Test Modality
- Identification Effect
- Study List
- Test List