Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Behavior Research Methods
  3. Article
Variations of the flanker paradigm: Assessing selective attention in young children
Download PDF
Download PDF
  • Published: February 2007

Variations of the flanker paradigm: Assessing selective attention in young children

  • Jennifer Martin McDermott1,
  • Koraly Pérez-Edgar1 &
  • Nathan A. Fox1 

Behavior Research Methods volume 39, pages 62–70 (2007)Cite this article

  • 4613 Accesses

  • 64 Citations

  • 332 Altmetric

  • Metrics details

Abstract

The development of selective attention and associated self-regulatory processes was assessed in young children, ages 4, 5, and 6, through the use of three alternative versions of the flanker paradigm utilizing colors, shapes, and fish. These variations were used to examine the influence of task differences on children’s performance. The presence of cognitive self-regulatory strategies in young children was also assessed. Significant flanker interference effects, marked by significant task-linked response time differences, were found across all three versions of the paradigm. Although a significant portion of children demonstrated self-regulatory abilities, not every participant demonstrated the specific strategies of self-monitoring and response control. Furthermore, these differences were evident across all age groups. The implications of these results are discussed within the theoretical context of task development, taking into consideration the need to modify computerized attention paradigms for use with young children in order to reliably measure cognitive constructs across children and adults.

Download to read the full article text

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

References

  • Barrett, S. E., &Shepp, B. E. (1988). Developmental changes in attentional skills: The effect of irrelevant variations on encoding and response selection.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,45, 382–399.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A., Jones, L., Rothbart, M. K., &Posner, M. I. (2000). Computerized games to study the development of attention in childhood.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,32, 297–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besner, D., &Stolz, J. A. (1999). Unconsciously controlled processing: The Stroop effect reconsidered.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review,6, 449–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjorklund, D. F., &Harnishfeger, K. K. (1990). The resources construct in cognitive development: Diverse sources of evidence and a theory of inefficient inhibition.Developmental Review,10, 48–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodeur, D. A. (2004). Age changes in attention control: Assessing the role of stimulus contingencies.Cognitive Development,19, 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge, S. A., Dudukovic, N. M., Thomason, M. E., Vaidya, C. J., &Gabrieli, J. D. E. (2002). Immature frontal lobe contributions to cognitive control in children: Evidence from fMRI.Neuron,33, 301–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burack, J. A., &Enns, J. T. (1997).Attention, development, and psychopathology. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burack, J. A., Enns, J. T., Iarocci, G., &Randolph, B. (2000). Age differences in visual search for compound patterns: Long- versus short-range grouping.Developmental Psychology,36, 731–740.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, A. C., Livesey, D. J., &Charles, M. (2001). Age related changes in inhibitory control as measured by stop signal task performance.International Journal of Neuroscience,107, 43–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Case, R. (1985).Intellectual development: Birth to adulthood. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, B. J., Tottenham, N., &Fossella, J. (2002). Clinical, imaging, lesion, and genetic approaches toward a model of cognitive control.Developmental Psychobiology,40, 237–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. L., Segalowitz, S. J., &Gavin, W. J. (2004). Development of response-monitoring ERPs in 7- to 25-year-olds.Developmental Neuropsychology,25, 355–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dempster, F. N. (1993). Resistance to interference: Developmental changes in a basic processing mechanism. In M. L. Howe & R. Pasnak (Eds.),Emerging themes in cognitive development: Vol. 1. Foundations (pp. 3–27). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derryberry, D., &Rothbart, M. K. (1997). Reactive and effortful processes in the organization of temperament.Development & Psychopathology,9, 633–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, R., &Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention.Annual Reviews in Neuroscience,18, 193–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, A. (1990). The development and neural bases of memory functions as indexed by the AB and delayed response tasks in human infants and infant monkeys. In A. Diamond (Ed.),The development and neural bases of higher cognitive functions (Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 608, pp. 267–317). New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukette, D., &Stiles, J. (2001). The effects of stimulus density on children’s analysis of hierarchical patterns.Developmental Science,4, 233–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enns, J. T., &Akhtar, N. (1989). A developmental study of filtering in visual attention.Child Development,60, 1188–1199.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enns, J. T., &Cameron, S. (1987). Selective attention in young children: The relations between visual search, filtering, and priming.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,44, 38–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Enns, J. T., &Girgus, J. S. (1985). Developmental changes in selective and integrative visual attention.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,40, 319–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksen, B. A., &Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task.Perception & Psychophysics,16, 143–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, C. S., &Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention.Nature,423, 534–537.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhouse, S. W., &Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data.Psychometrika,24, 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hale, S. (1990). A global developmental trend in cognitive processing speed.Child Development,61, 653–663.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halford, G. S. (1993).Children’s understanding: The development of mental models. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnishfeger, K. K. (1995). The development of cognitive inhibition: Theories, definitions, and research evidence. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.),Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp. 175–204). San Diego: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, H. A. (2003). Temperamental contributions to problem solving: Cognitive and affective processes.Dissertation Abstracts International,64, 1B. (UMI No. 0419-4217)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang-Pollock, C. L., Carr, T. H., &Nigg, J. T. (2002). Development of selective attention: Perceptual load influences early versus late attentional selection in children and adults.Developmental Psychology,38, 363–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacques, S., &Zelazo, P. D. (2001). The Flexible Item Selection Task (FIST): A measure of executive function in preschoolers. DevelopmentalNeuropsychology,20, 573–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L. B., Rothbart, M. K., &Posner, M. I. (2003). Development of executive attention in preschool children.Developmental Science,6, 498–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R. (1986). Sources of age differences in speed of processing.Child Development,57, 969–987.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R. (1993). Processing time decreases globally at an exponential rate during childhood and adolescence.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,56, 254–265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, A., &Zelazo, P. D. (2004). Development of “hot” executive function: The children’s gambling task.Brain & Cognition,55, 148–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lane, D. M., &Pearson, D. A. (1982). The development of selective attention.Merrill—Palmer Quarterly,28, 317–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luu, P., Collins, P., &Tucker, D. M. (2000). Mood, personality, and self-monitoring: Negative affect and emotionality in relation to frontal lobe mechanisms of error monitoring.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,129, 43–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller, U., Zelazo, P. D., Hood, S., Leone, T., &Rohrer, L. (2004). Interference control in a new rule use task: Age-related changes, labeling, and attention.Child Development,75, 1594–1609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pailing, P. E., &Segalowitz, S. J. (2004). The error-related negativity as a state and trait measure: Motivation, personality, and ERPs in response to errors.Psychophysiology,41, 84–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pailing, P. E., Segalowitz, S. J., Dywan, J., &Davies, P. L. (2002). Error negativity and response control.Psychophysiology,39, 198–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pastò, L., &Burack, J. A. (1997). A developmental study of visual attention: Issues of filtering efficiency and focus.Cognitive Development,12, 427–439.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pick, A. D., Christy, M. D., &Frankel, G. W. (1972). A developmental study of visual selective attention.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,14, 165–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., &Rothbart, M. K. (2000). Developing mechanisms of self-regulation.Development & Psychopathology,12, 427–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard, V. E., &Neumann, E. (2004). Negative priming effects in children engaged in nonspatial tasks: Evidence for early development of an intact inhibitory mechanism.Developmental Psychology,40, 191–203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ridderinkhof, K. R., &van der Molen, M. W. (1995). A psychophysiological analysis of developmental differences in the ability to resist interference.Child Development,66, 1040–1056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridderinkhof, K. R., van der Molen, M. W., Band, G. P. H., &Bashore, T. R. (1997). Sources of interference from irrelevant information: A developmental study.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,65, 315–341.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rueda, M. R., Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Halparin, J. D., Gruber, D. B., Lercari, L. P., &Posner, M. I. (2004). Development of attentional networks in childhood.Neuropsychologia,42, 1029–1040.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shallice, T. (1988).From neuropsychology to mental structure. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tipper, S. P., Bourque, T. A., Anderson, S. H., &Brehaut, J. C. (1989). Mechanisms of attention: A developmental study.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology,48, 353–378.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tipper, S. P., &McLaren, J. (1990). Evidence for efficient visual selectivity in children. In J. T. Enns (Ed.),The development of attention: Research and theory (pp. 197–210). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • van der Molen, M. W. (2000). Developmental changes in inhibitory processing: Evidence from psychophysiological measures.Biological Psychology,54, 207–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, I., Waterman, M., Prescott, H., &Murdoch-Eaton, D. (2003). A new Stroop-like measure of inhibitory function development: Typical developmental trends.Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry,44, 561–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelazo, P. D., Frye, D., &Rapus, T. (1996). An age-related dissociation between knowing rules and using them.Cognitive Development,11, 37–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelazo, P. D., Reznick, J. S., &Piñon, D. E. (1995). Response control and the execution of verbal rules.Developmental Psychology,31, 508–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Development, University of Maryland, 3304 Benjamin Building, 20742, College Park, MD

    Jennifer Martin McDermott, Koraly Pérez-Edgar & Nathan A. Fox

Authors
  1. Jennifer Martin McDermott
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Koraly Pérez-Edgar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nathan A. Fox
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer Martin McDermott.

Additional information

The project was supported by The Early Experience, Stress Neurobiology, and Prevention Science Network, directed by Megan Gunnar (NIMH Grant 1 R21 MH65046). J.M.M. is a trainee of this network. This project was also partially supported by NIH Grant HD17899, awarded to N.A.F. K.P.-E. is now at George Mason University.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McDermott, J.M., Pérez-Edgar, K. & Fox, N.A. Variations of the flanker paradigm: Assessing selective attention in young children. Behav Res 39, 62–70 (2007). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192844

Download citation

  • Received: 11 March 2005

  • Accepted: 04 October 2005

  • Issue Date: February 2007

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192844

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Interference Effect
  • Selective Attention
  • Incongruent Trial
  • Color Version
  • Effortful Control
Download PDF

Working on a manuscript?

Avoid the common mistakes

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

167.114.118.212

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2023 Springer Nature