Abstract
In a typical conditional discrimination, a target stimulus (X) is reinforced during one feature cue (A→X+), but not during another feature cue (B→X−). The present experiments used only a single “feature” cue (a 66-sec tone). On half of the trials, the target stimulus (a 400-msec light) was paired with the reinforcer when the feature-target interval was one duration (e.g., 5 sec). On the remaining trials, the interval was different (e.g., 45 sec), and the target stimulus was presented without the reinforcer. All the animals acquired this temporal discrimination, and subsequent testing with other feature-target intervals yielded generalization-like gradients. These results provide solid evidence that each portion of a feature cue is encoded in a distinctive fashion. Had temporal encoding not occurred, the feature cue would have been just as ambiguous a predictor of the reinforcer as was the target stimulus, and discrimination would not have been possible. The integration of real-time temporal encoding mechanisms into models of conditional discrimination is discussed.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Asratyan, E. A. (1965).Compensatory adaptations, reflex activity and the brain. Oxford: Pergamon.
Barnet, R. C., &Miller, R. R. (1996). Temporal encoding as a determinant of inhibitory control.Learning & Motivation,27, 73–91.
Bouton, M. E. (1991). Context and retrieval in extinction and in other examples of interference in simple associative learning. In L. Dachowski & C. F. Flaherty (Eds.),Current topics in animal learning: Brain, emotion, and cognition (pp. 25–49). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Brandon, S. E., &Wagner, A. R. (1991). Modulation of a discrete Pavlovian conditioned reflex by a putative emotive Pavlovian conditioned stimulus.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,17, 299–311.
Buhusi, C. V., &Schmajuk, N. A. (1999). Timing in simple conditioning and occasion setting: A neural network approach.Behavioural Processes,45, 33–57.
Desmond, J. E. (1990). Temporal adaptive responses in neural models: The stimulus trace. In M. Gabriel & J. W. Moore (Eds.),Learning and computational neuroscience (pp. 421–456). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Desmond, J. E., &Moore, J. W. (1988). Adaptive timing in neural networks: The conditioned response.Biological Cybernetics,58, 405–415.
Gibbon, J. (1977). Scalar expectancy theory and Weber’s law in animal timing.Psychological Review,84, 279–325.
Gibbon, J. (1991). Origins of scalar timing.Learning & Motivation,22, 3–38.
Gibbs, C. M., Cool, V., Land, T., Kehoe, E. J., &Gormezano, I. (1991). Second-order conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response: Interstimulus interval and frequency of CS-CS pairings.Integrative Physiological & Behavioral Science,26, 282–295.
Gibbs, C. M., Kehoe, E. J., &Gormezano, I. (1991). Conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response to a CSA-CSB-US serial compound: Manipulations of CSB’s associative character.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,17, 423–432.
Gluck, M. A., &Bower, G. H. (1988). Evaluating an adaptive network model of human learning.Journal of Memory & Language,27, 166–195.
Gormezano, I. (1966). Classical conditioning. In J. B. Sidowski (Ed.),Experimental methods and instrumentation in psychology (pp. 385–420). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gormezano, I., &Gibbs, C. M. (1988). Transduction of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,20, 18–21.
Gormezano, I., &Kehoe, E. J. (1981). Classical conditioning and the law of contiguity. In P. M. Harzem & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.),Advances in analysis of behavior: Vol. 2. Predictability, correlation, and contiguity (pp. 1–45.). New York: Wiley.
Gormezano, I., Kehoe, E. J., &Marshall, B. S. (1983). Twenty years of classical conditioning research with the rabbit. In J.M. Sprague & A. N. Epstein (Eds.),Progress in psychobiology and physiological psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 197–275). New York: Academic Press.
Grahame, N. J., Barnet, R. C., &Miller, R. R. (1992). Pavlovian conditioning in multiple contexts: Competition between contexts for comparator status.Animal Learning & Behavior,20, 329–338.
Grahame, N. J., Hallam, S. C., Geier, L., &Miller, R. R. (1990). Context as an occasion setter following either CS acquisition and extinction or CS acquisition alone.Learning & Motivation,21, 237–265.
Grossberg, S., &Schmajuk, N. A. (1989). Neural dynamics of adaptive timing and temporal discrimination during associative learning.Neural Networks,2, 79–102.
Holland, P. C. (1983). Occasion-setting in Pavlovian feature positive discriminations. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.),Quantitative analyses of behavior: Discrimination processes (Vol. 4, pp. 182–206). New York: Ballinger.
Holland, P. C. (1992). Occasion setting in Pavlovian conditioning. In D. L. Medin (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 28, pp. 69–125). San Diego: Academic Press.
Holland, P. C., Hamlin, P. A., &Parsons, J. P. (1997). Temporal specificity in serial feature-positive discrimination learning.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,23, 95–109.
Hull, C. L. (1943).Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
James, J. H., &Wagner, A. R. (1980). One-trial overshadowing: Evidence of distributive processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,6, 188–205.
Kehoe, E. J. (1998). Can the whole be something other than the sum of its parts? In C. D. L. Wynne & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.),Models of action: Mechanisms for adaptive behavior (pp. 87–126). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Kehoe, E. J., Cool, V., &Gormezano, I. (1991). Trace conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response as a function of CS-US interstimulus interval and trials per session.Learning & Motivation,22, 269–290.
Kehoe, E. J., Feyer, A.-M., &Moses, J. L. (1981). Second-order conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response as a function of the CS2-CS1 and CS1-US intervals.Animal Learning & Behavior,9, 304–315.
Kehoe, E. J., Gibbs, C. M., Garcia, E., &Gormezano, I. (1979). Associative transfer and stimulus selection in classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response to serial compound CSs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,5, 1–18.
Kehoe, E. J., Horne, A. J., &Macrae, M. (1995). Learning to learn: Real-time features and a connectionist model.Adaptive Behavior,3, 235–271.
Kehoe, E. J., Marshall-Goodell, B., &Gormezano, I. (1987). Differential conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response to serial compound stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes,13, 17–30.
Kehoe, E. J., Palmer, N., Weidemann, G., &Macrae, M. (2000). The effect of feature-target intervals in conditional discriminations on acquisition and expression of conditioned nictitating membrane and heart rate responses in the rabbit.Animal Learning & Behavior,28, 80–91.
Kimmel, H. D., &Ray, R. L. (1978). Transswitching: Conditioning with tonic and phasic stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,107, 187–205.
Konorski, J. (1967).Integrative activity of the brain: An interdisciplinary approach. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Konorski, J., &Lawicka, W. (1959). Physiological mechanisms of delayed reactions: 1. The analysis and classification of delayed reactions.Acta Biologiae Experimentalis,19, 175–197.
Macrae, M., &Kehoe, E. J. (1995). Transfer between conditional and discrete discriminations in conditioning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response.Learning & Motivation,26, 380–402.
O’Brien, R. G., &Kaiser, M. K. (1985). MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: An extensive primer.Psychological Bulletin,97, 316–333.
Pavlov, I. P. (1927).Conditioned reflexes: An investigation of the physiological activity of the cerebral cortex (G. V. Anrep, Trans.). London: Oxford University Press.
Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning.Psychological Review,94, 61–73.
Pearce, J. M. (1994). Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model.Psychological Review,101, 587–607.
Razran, G. (1971).Mind in evolution. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.
Rescorla, R. A. (1973). Evidence for “unique stimulus” account of configural conditioning.Journal of Comparative & Physiological Psychology,85, 331–338.
Rescorla, R. A. (1985). Inhibition and facilitation. In R. R. Miller & N. E. Spear (Eds.),Information processing in animals: Conditioned inhibition (pp. 299–326). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Riley, D. A., Cook, R. G., &Lamb, M. R. (1981). A classification and analysis of short-term retention codes in the pigeon. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 15, pp. 51–79). New York: Academic Press.
Roberts, W. A., &Grant, D. S. (1976). Studies of short-term memory in the pigeon using the delay matching-to-sample procedure. In D. L. Medin, W. A. Roberts, & R. T. Davis (Eds.),Processes of animal memory (pp. 79–112). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Savastano, H. L., &Miller, R. R. (1998). Time as content in Pavlovian conditioning.Behavioural Processes,44, 147–162.
Scandrett, J., &Gormezano, I. (1980). Microprocessor control and A/D data acquisition in classical conditioning.Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation,12, 120–125.
Schmajuk, N. A., Lamoureux, J. A., &Holland, P. C. (1998). Occasion setting: A neural network approach.Psychological Review,105, 3–32.
Schneiderman, N. (1972). Response system divergencies in aversive classical conditioning. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.),Classical conditioning: Current research and theory (pp. 341–376). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Schreurs, B. G., Kehoe, E. J., &Gormezano, I. (1993). Concurrent associative transfer and competition in serial conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response.Learning & Motivation,24, 395–412.
Sutton, R. S., &Barto, A. G. (1981). Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction.Psychological Review,88, 135–171.
Sutton, R. S., &Barto, A. G. (1990). Time-derivative models of Pavlovian reinforcement. In M. Gabriel & J.W. Moore (Eds.),Learning and computational neuroscience (pp. 497–537). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Wagner, A. R., &Brandon, S. E. (1989). Evolution of a structured connectionist model of Pavlovian conditioning (AESOP). In S. B. Klein & R. R. Mowrer (Eds.),Contemporary learning theories: Pavlovian conditioning and the status of traditional learning theory (pp. 149–190). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Weidemann, G., Georgilas, A., &Kehoe, E. J. (1999). Temporal specificity in patterning of the rabbit nictitating membrane response.Animal Learning & Behavior,27, 99–107.
Weidemann, G., &Kehoe, E. J. (1997). Transfer and counterconditioning of conditional control in the rabbit nictitating membrane response.Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology,50B, 295–316.
White, N. E., Kehoe, E. J., Choi, J.-S., &Moore, J. W. (2000). Coefficients of variation in timing of the classically conditioned eyeblink in rabbits.Psychobiology,28, 520–524.
Whitlow, J. W., Jr., &Wagner, A. R. (1972). Negative patterning in classical conditioning: Summation of response tendencies to isolable and configural components.Psychonomic Science,27, 299–301.
Zackheim, J., Myers, C., &Gluck, M. (1998). A temporally sensitive recurrent network model of occasion setting. In N. Schmajuk & P. Holland (Eds.),Occasion setting: Associative learning and cognition in animals (pp. 319–342). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Preparation of this manuscript was supported by Australian Research Council Grant A79800067. The authors thank Benjamin Carr, Miriam Smith, Gabrielle Weidemann, and Natasha E. White for their assistance in collecting data and preparing the manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kehoe, E.J., Boesenberg, K.G. Temporal discrimination using different feature-target intervals in classical conditioning of the rabbit’s nictitating membrane response. Animal Learning & Behavior 30, 208–216 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192830
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192830