Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Behavior Research Methods
  3. Article

Using self-reported data to assess the validity of driving simulation data

  • Articles
  • Published: May 2006
  • Volume 38, pages 314–324, (2006)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Behavior Research Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Using self-reported data to assess the validity of driving simulation data
Download PDF
  • Bryan Reimer1,2,
  • Lisa A. D’Ambrosio1,
  • Joseph F. Coughlin1,
  • Michael E. Kafrissen1 &
  • …
  • Joseph Biederman1,3 
  • 2844 Accesses

  • 96 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

In this article, we use self-reported driving behaviors from a written questionnaire to assess the measurement validity of data derived from a driving simulation. The issue of validity concerns the extent to which measures from the experimental context map onto constructs of interest. Following a description of the experimental methods and setting, an argument for the face validity of the data is advanced. Convergent validity was assessed by regressing behaviors observed in the driving simulator on self-reported measures of driving behaviors. Significant relationships were found across six measures: accidents, speeding, velocity, passing, weaving between traffic, and behavior at stop signs. Concurrent validity was evaluated with an analysis of simulator accident involvement and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder status. Discriminant validity was assessed using a multitrait-multimethod matrix of simulator and questionnaire data. We concluded that although the relationship between self-reported behaviors and observed responses in the simulator falls short of perfect correspondence, the data collected from the driving simulator are valid measures of the behaviors of interest.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

A Longitudinal Simulator Study to Explore Drivers’ Behaviour During Highly-Automated Driving

Chapter © 2018

Relationships Between Years of Licensure and Driving Style Measured with a Short Simulator-Based Test (N = 650)

Chapter © 2017

A meta-analysis of simulator sickness as a function of simulator fidelity

Article Open access 19 October 2022
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Allen, R. W., Park, G., Rosenthal, T. J., & Aponso, B. (July, 2004).A process for developing scenarios for driving simulations. Paper presented at the IMAGE 2004 Conference, Scottsdale, AZ.

  • Alm, H., &Nilsson, L. (1995). The effects of a mobile telephone task on driver behaviour in a car following situation.Accident Analysis & Prevention,27, 707–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkley, R. A., Guevremont, D. C., Anastopoulos, A. D., DuPaul, G. J., &Shelton, T. L. (1993). Driving-related risks and outcomes of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adolescents and young adults: A 3- to 5-year follow-up survey.Pediatrics,92, 212–218.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Yaacov, A., Maltz, M., &Shinar, D. (2002). Effects of an invehicle collision avoidance warning system on short- and long-term driving performance.Human Factors,44, 335–342.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berg, D., Raugi, G. R., Gladstone, H. B., Berkley, J., Weghorst, S., Ganter, M., &Turkiyyah, G. (2001). Virtual reality simulators for dermatologic surgery: Measuring their validity as a teaching tool.Dermatologic Surgery,27, 370–374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Biederman, J., &Faraone, S. V. (2004). The Massachusetts General Hospital studies of gender influences on attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in youth and relatives.Psychiatric Clinics of North America,27, 225–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blana, E., &Golias, J. (2002). Differences between vehicle lateral displacment on the road and in a fixed-base simulator.Human Factors,44, 303–313.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, J. M., Dienstfrey, S. J., &Sothoron, A. (1998).National survey of speeding and other unsafe driving actions (Rep. No. DOT HS 808 749). U.S. Department of Transportation, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, I. D., Tickner, A. H., &Simmonds, D. C. (1969). Interference between concurrent tasks of driving and telephoning.Journal of Applied Psychology,53, 419–424.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brunnauer, A., Laux, G., Geiger, E., &Möller, H. J. (2004). The impact of antipsychotics on psychomotor performance with regards to car driving skills.Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology,24, 155–160.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., &Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix.Psychological Bulletin,56, 81–105.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. T., &Stanley, J. C. (1963).Experimental and quasiexperimental designs for research. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, D. B., Duchek, J., &Morris, J. C. (2000). Characteristics of motor vehicle crashes of drivers with dementia of the Alzheimer type.Journal of the American Geriatric Society,48, 100–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. J., Humphrey, J. W., Merkel, R. L., Penberthy, J. K., &Kovatchev, B. (2004). Controlled-release methylphenidate improves attention during on-road driving by adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.Journal of the American Board of Family Practice,17, 235–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. J., Merkel, R. L., Penberthy, J. K., Kovatchev, B., &Hankin, C. S. (2004). Impact of methylphenidate delivery profiles on driving performance of adolescents with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A pilot study.Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry,43, 269–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D. J., Penberthy, J. K., Zrebic, J., Weinger, K., Aikens, J. E., Frier, B., et al. (2003). Diabetes and driving mishaps.Diabetes Care,26, 2329–2334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, S. L., &Kaufman, J. A. (1998). The imperative for medical simulation.Proceedings of the IEEE,86, 479–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decina, L. E., Gish, K. W., Staplin, L., &Kirchner, A. H. (1996).Feasibility of new simulation technology to train novice drivers (Pub. No. DTNH22-95-C-05104). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring, B. (1990). A simulation study for analysing pilot’s rule-based behavior.Proceedings of the computer aided system design and simulation conference (p. 1–19). France: Neuilly Sur Seine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godley, S. T., Triggs, T. J., &Fildes, B. N. (2002). Driving simulator validation for speed research.Accident Analysis & Prevention,34, 589–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R. W., &Tetlock, P. C. (1999, October).The economics of regulating cellular phones in vehicles (Working Paper, 99-9). AEI-Brookings Joint Center for Regulatory Studies, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, L. (1996). Driving performance on a real road and in a driving simulator: Results of a validation study. In A. G. Gale, I. D. Brown, C. M. Haslegrave, & S. P. Taylor (Eds.),Vision in vehicles V (pp. 19–26). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R., MacKrell Gaglione, M., LaDuca, T., Leung, C., Sample, L., Gliva-McConvey, G., et al. (2004). Assessment of patient management skills and clinical skills of practising doctors using computer-based case simulations and standardised patients.Medical Education,38, 958–968.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, J. D., Lee, J. D., Brown, T. L., &McGehee, D. V. (2002). Comparison of driver braking responses in a high-fidelity simulator and on a test track.Transportation Research Record,1803, 59–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, C. A., Handley, S., &Feetam, C. (2004).Older drivers, illness and medication (Road Safety Res. Rep. No. 39). Department for Transport: London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd, C. M., &McClelland, G. H. (1998). Measurement. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.),Handbook of social psychology:Vol. 1 (4th ed., pp. 180–232). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, N. A., Theeuwes, J., &van der Horst, R. (1996). Driving simulator validity: Some considerations.Transportation Research Record,1550, 30–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidder, L. H., &Judd, C. M. (1986). Research methods in social relations. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klee, H., Bauer, C., Radwan, E., &Al-Deek, H. (1999). Preliminary validation of driving simulator based on forward speed.Transportation Research Record,1689, 33–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lagarde, E., Chastang, J. F., Gueguen, A., Coeuret-Pellicer, M., Chiron, M., &Lafont, S. (2004). Emotional stress and traffic accidents: The impact of separation and divorce.Epid emiology,15, 762–766.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, F., Laur, M., Hein, C. M., Srinivasan, R., &Jovanis, P. P. (1994).A simulator evaluation of five in-vehicle navigation aids (Publication No. UCD-ITS-RR-94-19). Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, R., Parker, D., Manstead, A. S. R., &Stradling, S. G. (1997). The role of affect in predicting social behaviors: The case of road traffic violations.Journal of Applied Social Psychology,27, 1258–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. C., Cameron, D., &Lee, A. H. (2003). Assessing the driving performance of older adult drivers: On-road versus simulated driving.Accident Analysis & Prevention,35, 797–803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. D. (2004).Simulator fidelity: How low can you go? Retrieved November 1, 2004, from www.uiowa.edu/neuroerg/Simulator%20Users%20Group/HFES_SimPanel.htm.

  • McGaw, D., &Watson, G. (1976).Political and social inquiry. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGwin, G., Jr.,Sims, R. V., Pulley, L., &Roseman, J. M. (2000). Relations among chronic medical conditions, medications, and automobile crashes in the elderly: A population-based case-control study.American Journal of Epidemiology,152, 424–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, A. J., &McKnight, A. S. (1993). The effect of cellular phone use upon driver attention.Accident Analysis & Prevention,25, 259–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motor Trend (1999).1999 import car of the year: Volkswagen New Beetle. Retrieved September 13, 2004, from www.motortrend.com/oftheyear/car/112_9902_icoy/value.html.

  • Murphy, K., &Barkley, R. A. (1996). Prevalence of DSM-IV symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in adult licensed drivers: Implications for clinical diagnosis.Journal of Attention Disorders,1, 147–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Transportation Safety Board (2004).Special investigation highway report: Medical oversight of noncommercial drivers (NTSB No. SIR-04/01). Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, L., &Recarte, M. (2002). Cognitive demands of hands-freephone conversation while driving.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology & Behaviour,5, 133–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D., Reason, J. T., Manstead, A. S. R., &Stradling, S. G. (1995). Driving errors, driving violations and accident involvement.Ergonomics,38, 1036–1048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranney, T. A., Heydinger, G., Watson, G., Salaani, K., Mazzae, E. N., &Grygier, P. (2002).Investigation of driver reactions to tread separation scenarios in the National Advanced Driving Simulator (NADS) (Rep. No. DOT HS 809 523). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, M. P., &Green, P. A. (1999). Comparison of driver performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialing task.Ergonomics,42, 1015–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rimmö, P. A., &Hakamies-Blomqvist, L. (2002). Older drivers’ aberrant behaviour, impaired activity, and health as reasons for selfimposed driving limitations.Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology & Behaviour,5, 47–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rizzo, M., Reinach, S., McGehee, D., &Dawson, J. (1997). Simulated car crashes and crash predictors in drivers with Alzheimer disease.Archives of Neurology,54, 545–551.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rolfe, J., &Hampson, B. P. (2003). Flight simulation-Viability versus liability issues of accuracy, data and validation.Aeronautical Journal,107, 631–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstone, S. J., Hansen, J. M., &Kinder, D. R. (1986). Measuring change in personal economic well-being.Public Opinion Quarterly,50, 176–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarathy, S., &Higman, J. (1994). Development and validation of the OH-58D Kiowa Warrior High Fidelity Flight Simulation Model.Proceedings of the annual forum of the American Helicopter Society,2, 905–914.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi, M., Reimer, B., &Llamazares, I. (2002). Glance analysis of driver eye movements to evaluate distraction.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,34, 529–538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanton, N. A., Young, M. S., Walker, G. H., Turner, H., &Randle, S. (2001). Automating the driver’s control tasks.International Journal of Cognitive Ergonomics,5, 221–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, A. C., Allen, R. W., & Parseghian, Z. (1992, July).The use of low-cost interactive driving simulation to detect impaired drivers. Paper presented at the IMAGE VI Conference, Scottsdale, AZ.

  • Stradling, S. G., &Meadows, M. L. (2000). Highway code and aggressive violations in UK drivers. InProceedings of the Global Web Conference on Aggressive Driving Issues (pp. 1–14). Ontario: Ministry of Transportation of Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stutts, J. C., &Wilkins, J. W. (2003). On-road driving evaluations: A potential tool for helping older adults drive safely longer.Journal of Safety Research,34, 431–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Törnros, J. (1998). Driving behavior in a real and a simulated road tunnel—a validation study.Accident Analysis & Prevention,30, 497–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, G., Hechtman, L., Perlman, T., Hopkins, J., &Wener, A. (1979). Hyperactives as young adults: A controlled prospective tenyear follow-up of 75 children.Archives of General Psychiatry,36, 675–681.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zuin, D., Ortiz, H., Boromei, D., &Lopez, O. L. (2002). Motor vehicle crashes and abnormal driving behaviours in patients with dementia in Mendoza, Argentina.European Journal of Neurology,9, 29–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. A geLab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave., Room E40-291, 02139, Cambridge, MA

    Bryan Reimer, Lisa A. D’Ambrosio, Joseph F. Coughlin, Michael E. Kafrissen & Joseph Biederman

  2. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts

    Bryan Reimer

  3. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

    Joseph Biederman

Authors
  1. Bryan Reimer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lisa A. D’Ambrosio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joseph F. Coughlin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  4. Michael E. Kafrissen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

  5. Joseph Biederman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author inPubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryan Reimer.

Additional information

This project was supported by the Johnson & Johnson Center for Pediatric Psychopathology Research at the Massachusetts General Hospital and the U.S. Department of Transportation’s New England University Center at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reimer, B., D’Ambrosio, L.A., Coughlin, J.F. et al. Using self-reported data to assess the validity of driving simulation data. Behavior Research Methods 38, 314–324 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192783

Download citation

  • Received: 15 November 2004

  • Accepted: 29 March 2005

  • Issue Date: May 2006

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192783

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Convergent Validity
  • Concurrent Validity
  • Stop Sign
  • Driving Simulation
  • Simulator Sickness
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our brands

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Discover
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Legal notice
  • Cancel contracts here

65.109.116.201

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature