Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Behavior Research Methods
  3. Article

An evaluation of response allocations to concurrently available slot machine simulations

  • Articles from the SCiP Conference
  • Published: May 2006
  • Volume 38, pages 232–236, (2006)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Behavior Research Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript
An evaluation of response allocations to concurrently available slot machine simulations
Download PDF
  • Mark R. Dixon1,
  • Otto H. MacLin2 &
  • Dustin Daugherty2 
  • 1064 Accesses

  • 31 Citations

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

Gambling behavior often involves making choices between concurrently available game options. With regard to slot machine gambling, multiple games allow for choices to be made with respect to which game to play. The authors of the present study used a slot machine simulation created in Visual Basic. NET to examine gambling preference. The specific question addressed was whether gamblers prefer a smaller payout more often (averaging around every 10 spins) over a larger payout less often (averaging around every 50 spins). Two types of reinforcement were examined during the study: frequency of payouts and the amount of credits won. The results indicate that participants had a preference for a slot machine with the more frequent payout as opposed to one with more intermittent payout. These results support existing literature on theories of choice and provide a step toward understanding human gambling behavior.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Realistic Free-Spins Features Increase Preference for Slot Machines

Article 20 July 2016

Lorance F. Taylor, Anne C. Macaskill & Maree J. Hunt

The Effects of Machine Balance and Free-Spins Features on Machine Preference and Bet Amounts

Article 08 January 2019

Lydia A. Chapman, Maree J. Hunt, … Anne C. Macaskill

Testing an Incentive-Sensitisation Approach to Understanding Problem Slot-Machine Gambling Using an Online Slot-Machine Simulation

Article 16 October 2017

Belinda Davey & Robert Cummins

Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Dixon, M. A., &MacLin, O. H. (2003).Visual Basic for behavioral psychologists. Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, M. R., MacLin, O. H., & Daugherty, D. (2006). Dual-monitor preference paradigm: A new method for examining preference. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Dixon, M. R., &Schreiber, J. E. (2004). Near-miss effects on response latencies and win estimations of slot machine play.Psychological Record,54, 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Double Magic Slot Machine (n.d.). Retrieved August 20, 2002, from www.gambling-slots.info/slots/double_magic.htm.

  • Griffiths, M. (1999). Gambling technologies: Prospects for problem gambling.Journal of Gambling Studies,15, 265–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlburt, R. T., Knapp, T. J., &Knowles, S. H. (1980). Simulated slot-machine play with concurrent variable ratio and random ratio schedules of reinforcement.Psychological Records,47, 635–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLin, O. H., Dixon, M. R., &Hayes, L. J. (1999). A computerized slot machine simulation to investigate the variables involved in gambling behavior.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers,31, 731–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLin, O. H., Dixon, M. R., Robinson, A., &Daugherty, D. (2006). Writing a simple slot machine simulation program. In P. M. Ghezzi, C. Lyons, M. Dixon, & G. Wilson (Eds.),Gambling: Behavior theory, research, and application (pp. 127–154). Reno, NV: Context Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois

    Mark R. Dixon

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Northern Iowa, 50614, Cedar Falls, Iowa

    Otto H. MacLin & Dustin Daugherty

Authors
  1. Mark R. Dixon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Otto H. MacLin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dustin Daugherty
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Otto H. MacLin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dixon, M.R., MacLin, O.H. & Daugherty, D. An evaluation of response allocations to concurrently available slot machine simulations. Behavior Research Methods 38, 232–236 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192774

Download citation

  • Received: 14 March 2006

  • Accepted: 08 May 2006

  • Issue Date: May 2006

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192774

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Pathological Gambling
  • Gambling Behavior
  • Slot Machine
  • Total Credit
  • Response Allocation
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support

95.216.99.153

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2024 Springer Nature