Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in
Menu
Find a journal Publish with us Track your research
Search
Cart
  1. Home
  2. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics
  3. Article

Semantic memory for contextual regularities within and across scene categories: Evidence from eye movements

  • Research Articles
  • Published: October 2010
  • Volume 72, pages 1803–1813, (2010)
  • Cite this article
Download PDF
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics Aims and scope Submit manuscript
Semantic memory for contextual regularities within and across scene categories: Evidence from eye movements
Download PDF
  • James R. Brockmole2 &
  • Melissa Le-Hoa Võ1 
  • 1030 Accesses

  • Explore all metrics

Abstract

When encountering familiar scenes, observers can use item-specific memory to facilitate the guidance of attention to objects appearing in known locations or configurations. Here, we investigated how memory for relational contingencies that emerge across different scenes can be exploited to guide attention. Participants searched for letter targets embedded in pictures of bedrooms. In a between-subjects manipulation, targets were either always on a bed pillow or randomly positioned. When targets were systematically located within scenes, search for targets became more efficient. Importantly, this learning transferred to bedrooms without pillows, ruling out learning that is based on perceptual contingencies. Learning also transferred to living room scenes, but it did not transfer to kitchen scenes, even though both scene types contained pillows. These results suggest that statistical regularities abstracted across a range of stimuli are governed by semantic expectations regarding the presence of target-predicting local landmarks. Moreover, explicit awareness of these contingencies led to a central tendency bias in recall memory for precise target positions that is similar to the spatial category effects observed in landmark memory. These results broaden the scope of conditions under which contextual cuing operates and demonstrate how semantic memory plays a causal and independent role in the learning of associations between objects in real-world scenes.

Article PDF

Download to read the full article text

Similar content being viewed by others

Contextual Cueing

Chapter © 2020

Reciprocal semantic predictions drive categorization of scene contexts and objects even when they are separate

Article Open access 21 May 2020

Stuck on semantics: Processing of irrelevant object-scene inconsistencies modulates ongoing gaze behavior

Article 19 September 2016
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

References

  • Baldwin, D., Andersson, A., Saffran, J., & Meyer, M. (2008). Segmenting dynamic human action via statistical structure. Cognition, 106, 1382–1407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, T. F., & Oliva, A. (2008). Statistical learning using real-world scenes: Extracting categorical regularities without conscious intent. Psychological Science, 19, 678–685.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual cuing in naturalistic scenes: Global and local contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 699–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockmole, J. R., Hambrick, D. Z., Windisch, D. J., & Henderson, J. M. (2008). The role of meaning in contextual cuing: Evidence from chess expertise. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 1886–1896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006a). Recognition and attention guidance during contextual cuing in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 1177–1187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockmole, J. R., & Henderson, J. M. (2006b). Using real-world scenes as contextual cues for search. Visual Cognition, 13, 99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buswell, G. T. (1935). How people look at pictures: A study of the psychology of perception in art. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2007). Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 753–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1998). Contextual cuing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 28–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. (1999). Top-down attentional guidance based on implicit learning of visual covariation. Psychological Science, 10, 360–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chun, M. M., & Turk-Browne, N. B. (2008). Associative learning mechanisms in vision. In S. J. Luck & A. R. Hollingworth (Eds.), Visual memory (pp. 209–245). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crist, R. E., Kapadia, M. K., Westheimer, G., & Gilbert, C. D. (1997). Perceptual learning of spatial localization: Specificity for orientation, position, and context. Journal of Neurophysiology, 78, 2889–2894.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, J. L. (2007). Consistency effects between objects in scenes. Memory & Cognition, 35, 393–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, J. L., & Potter, M. C. (2004). Scene consistency in object and background perception. Psychological Science, 15, 559–564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Graef, P., Christiaens, D., & d’Ydewalle, G. (1990). Perceptual effects of scene context on object identification. Psychological Research, 52, 317–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, M. P., Drescher, B. A., & Shimozaki, S. S. (2006). Attentional cues in real scenes, saccadic targeting, and Bayesian priors. Psychological Science, 17, 973–980.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ehinger, K. A., & Brockmole, J. R. (2008). The role of color in visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from contextual cuing. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1366–1378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2001). Unsupervised statistical learning of higher-order spatial structures from visual scenes. Psychological Science, 12, 499–504.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 458–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2005). Encoding multielement scenes: Statistical learning of visual feature hierarchies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 521–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A., & Liebelt, L. S. (1981). On the time course of viewing pictures with a view towards remembering. In D. F. Fisher, R. A. Monty, & J. W. Senders (Eds.), Eye movements: Cognition and visual perception (pp. 137–155). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Geng, J. J., & Behrmann, M. (2002). Probability cuing of target location facilitates visual search implicitly in normal participants and patients with hemispatial neglect. Psychological Science, 13, 520–525.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Geng, J. J., & Behrmann, M. (2005). Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 67, 1252–1268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goujon, A., Didierjean, A., & Marmèche, E. (2007). Contextual cuing based on specific and categorical properties of the environment. Visual Cognition, 15, 257–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goujon, A., Didierjean, A., & Marmèche, E. (2009). Semantic contextual cuing and visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 50–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Mack, M. (2007). Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real-world scenes. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 537–562). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J. M., Weeks, P. A., & Hollingworth, A. (1999). The effects of semantic consistency on eye movements during complex scene viewing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 25, 210–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huttenlocher, J., Hedges, L. V., & Duncan, S. (1991). Categoriesand particulars: Prototype effects in estimating spatial location. Psychological Review, 98, 352–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Selective attention modulates implicit learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1105–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, Y., & Song, J.-H. (2005). Hyperspecificity in visual implicit learning: Learning of spatial layout is contingent on item identity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1439–1448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkham, N. Z., Slemmer, J. A., & Johnson, S. P. (2002). Visual statistical learning in infancy: Evidence for a domain general learning mechanism. Cognition, 83, B35-B42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kunar, M. A., Flusberg, S., Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Does contextual cuing guide the deployment of attention? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 816–828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. L., Altom, M. W., & Murphy, T. D. (1984). Given versus induced category representations: Use of prototype and exemplar information in classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 10, 333–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2006). Scene context guides eye movements during visual search. Vision Research, 46, 614–621.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2001). Temporal contextual cuing of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 1299–1313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, I. R., & Chun, M. M. (2002). Perceptual constraints on implicit learning of spatial context. Visual Cognition, 9, 273–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, M. S., & Kramer, A. F. (2001). Attentional guidance of the eyes by contextual information and abrupt onsets. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 1239–1249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R. N. (1967). Recognition memory for words, sentences, and pictures. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 6, 156–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, A. C., & Shanks, D. R. (2008). Awareness in contextual cuing with extended and concurrent explicit tests. Memory & Cognition, 36, 403–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Standing, L. (1973). Learning 10,000 pictures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 207–222.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Standing, L., Conezio, J., & Haber, R. N. (1970). Perception and memory for pictures: Single-trial learning of 2500 visual stimuli. Psychonomic Science, 19, 73–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torralba, A., Oliva, A., Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in realworld scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113, 766–786.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turk-Browne, N. B., Isola, P. J., Scholl, B. J., & Treat, T. A. (2008). Multidimensional visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 34, 399–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turk-Browne, N. B., Jungé, J. A., & Scholl, B. J. (2005). The automaticity of visual statistical learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 552–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turk-Browne, N. B., & Scholl, B. J. (2009). Flexible visual statistical learning: Transfer across space and time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turk-Browne, N. B., Scholl, B. J., Chun, M. M., & Johnson, M. K. (2009). Neural evidence of statistical learning: Efficient detection of visual regularities without awareness. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1934–1945.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Võ, M. L.-H., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). Does gravity matter? Effects of semantic and syntactic inconsistencies on the allocation of attention during scene perception. Journal of Vision, 9(3, Art. 24), 1–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yarbus, A. L. (1967). Eye movements and vision. New York: Plenum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts

    Melissa Le-Hoa Võ

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Notre Dame, 118 Haggar Hall, 46556, Notre Dame, IN

    James R. Brockmole

Authors
  1. James R. Brockmole
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Melissa Le-Hoa Võ
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James R. Brockmole.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brockmole, J.R., Le-Hoa Võ, M. Semantic memory for contextual regularities within and across scene categories: Evidence from eye movements. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 1803–1813 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.7.1803

Download citation

  • Received: 27 July 2009

  • Accepted: 17 April 2010

  • Issue Date: October 2010

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.7.1803

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

Keywords

  • Transfer Trial
  • Part Icipants
  • Visual Statistical Learning
  • Scene Exemplar
  • Isual Searc
Use our pre-submission checklist

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

Advertisement

Search

Navigation

  • Find a journal
  • Publish with us
  • Track your research

Discover content

  • Journals A-Z
  • Books A-Z

Publish with us

  • Journal finder
  • Publish your research
  • Open access publishing

Products and services

  • Our products
  • Librarians
  • Societies
  • Partners and advertisers

Our imprints

  • Springer
  • Nature Portfolio
  • BMC
  • Palgrave Macmillan
  • Apress
  • Your US state privacy rights
  • Accessibility statement
  • Terms and conditions
  • Privacy policy
  • Help and support
  • Cancel contracts here

65.109.116.201

Not affiliated

Springer Nature

© 2025 Springer Nature