Abstract
In the present study, we investigated whether involuntarily directing attention to a target-colored distractor causes the corresponding attentional set to enter a limited-capacity focus of attention, thereby facilitating the identification of a subsequent target whose color matches the same attentional set. As predicted, in Experiment 1, contingent attentional capture effects from a target-colored distractor were only one half to one third as large when subsequent target identification relied on the same (vs. a different) attentional set. In Experiment 2, this effect was eliminated when all of the target colors matched the same attentional set, arguing against bottomup perceptual priming of the distractor’s color as an alternative account of our findings. In Experiment 3, this effect was reversed when a target-colored distractor appeared after the target, ruling out a feature-based interference account of our findings. We conclude that capacity limitations in working memory strongly influence contingent attentional capture when multiple attentional sets guide selection.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adamo, M., Pun, C., Pratt, J., & Ferber, S. (2008). Your divided attention, please! The maintenance of multiple attentional control sets over distinct regions in space. Cognition, 107, 295–303.
Anderson, B. A., & Folk, C. L. (2010). Variations in the magnitude of attentional capture: Testing a two-process model. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 342–352.
Ansorge, U., & Heumann, M. (2003). Top-down contingencies in peripheral cuing: The roles of color and location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 937–948.
Ansorge, U., & Horstmann, G. (2007). Preemptive control of attentional capture by colour: Evidence from trial-by-trial analyses and orderings of onsets of capture effects in reaction time distributions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 952–975.
Ansorge, U., Horstmann, G., & Carbone, E. (2005). Top-down contingent capture by colour: Evidence from RT distribution analyses in a manual choice reaction task. Acta Psychologica, 120, 243–266.
Bacon, W. F., & Egeth, H. E. (1994). Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Perception & Psychophysics, 55, 485–496.
Bao, M., Li, Z.-H., & Zhang, D.-R. (2007). Binding facilitates attention switching within working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 33, 959–969.
Belopolsky, A. V., Kramer, A. F., & Godijn, R. (2008). Transfer of information into working memory during attentional capture. Visual Cognition, 16, 409–418.
Belopolsky, A. V., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). What is topdown about contingent capture? Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 326–341.
Berti, S. (2008). Object switching within working memory is reflected in the human event-related brain potential. Neuroscience Letters, 434, 200–205.
Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. (2002). Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 201–215.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.
Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.
Di Lollo, V., Kawahara, J., Ghorashi, S.M. S., & Enns, J. T. (2005). The attentional blink: Resource depletion or temporary loss of control? Psychological Research, 69, 191–200.
Dux, P. E., & Marois, R. (2009). The attentional blink: A review of data and theory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1683–1700.
Farell, B. (1985). Same—different judgments: A review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 419–456.
Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2002). Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 64, 741–753.
Folk, C. L., Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2008). Top-down control settings and the attentional blink: Evidence for nonspatial contingent capture. Visual Cognition, 16, 616–642.
Folk, C. L., & Remington, R. W. (2008). Bottom-up priming of topdown attentional control settings. Visual Cognition, 16, 215–231.
Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 1030–1044.
Garavan, H. (1998). Serial attention within working memory. Memory & Cognition, 26, 263–276.
Gibson, B. S., & Kelsey, E. M. (1998). Stimulus-driven attentional capture is contingent on attentional set for displaywide visual features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 699–706.
Henson, R. N. A. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of priming. Progress in Neurobiology, 70, 53–81.
Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2006). The effect of items in working memory on the deployment of attention and eyes during visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 423–442.
Hsieh, S., & Allport, A. (1994). Shifting attention in a rapid visual search paradigm. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 79, 315–335.
Jonides, J., Lewis, R. L., Nee, D. E., Lustig, C. A., Berman, M. G., & Moore, K. S. (2008). The mind and brain of short-term memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 193–224.
Juola, J. F., Botella, J., & Palacios, A. (2004). Task- and locationswitching effects on visual attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1303–1317.
Leber, A. B., & Egeth, H. E. (2006). Attention on autopilot: Past experience and attentional set. Visual Cognition, 14, 565–583.
Leblanc, E., Prime, D. J., & Jolicoeur, P. (2008). Tracking the location of visuospatial attention in a contingent capture paradigm. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 657–671.
Lleras, A., Kawahara, J., & Levinthal, B. R. (2009). Past rejections lead to future misses: Selection-related inhibition produces blinklike misses of future (easily detectable) events. Journal of Vision, 9(3, Art. 26), 1–12.
Mayr, U., & Keele, S. W. (2000). Changing internal constraints on action: The role of backward inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 4–26.
McElree, B. (2001). Working memory and focal attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 817–835.
Meiran, N., Chorev, Z., & Sapir, A. (2000). Component processes in task switching. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 211–253.
Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 134–140.
Most, S. B., & Astur, R. S. (2007). Feature-based attentional set as a cause of traffic accidents. Visual Cognition, 15, 125–132.
Nieuwenstein, M. R. (2006). Top-down controlled, delayed selection in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 32, 973–985.
Nieuwenstein, M. R., Chun, M. M., van der Lubbe, R. H. J., & Hooge, T. C. (2005). Delayed attentional engagement in the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 1463–1475.
Oberauer, K. (2002). Access to information in working memory: Exploring the focus of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 28, 411–421.
Oberauer, K. (2003). Selective attention to elements in working memory. Experimental Psychology, 50, 257–269.
Oberauer, K., & Bialkova, S. (2009). Accessing information in working memory: Can the focus of attention grasp two elements at the same time? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 64–87.
Olivers, C. N. L. (2008). Interactions between visual working memory and visual attention. Frontiers in Bioscience, 13, 1182–1191.
Olivers, C. N. L. (2009). What drives memory-driven attentional capture? The effects of memory type, display type, and search type. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 1275–1291.
Olivers, C. N. L., & Humphreys, G. W. (2003). Attentional guidance by salient feature singletons depends on intertrial contingencies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 29, 650–657.
Olivers, C. N. L., & Meeter, M. (2008). A boost and bounce theory of temporal attention. Psychological Review, 115, 836–863.
Posner, M. I., & Mitchell, R. F. (1967). Chronometric analysis of classification. Psychological Review, 74, 392–409.
Posner, M. I., & Rothbart, M. K. (2007). Research on attention networks as a model for the integration of psychological science. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 1–23.
Ranney, T. A. (2008). Driver distraction: A review of the current state of-knowledge. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
Serences, J. T., Shomstein, S., Leber, A. B., Golay, X., Egeth, H. E., & Yantis, S. (2005). Coordination of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional control in human cortex. Psychological Science, 16, 114–122.
Shih, S.-I., & Reeves, A. (2007). Attentional capture in rapid serial visual presentation. Spatial Vision, 20, 301–315.
Soto, D., Heinke, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Blanco, M. J. (2005). Early, involuntary top-down guidance of attention from working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 31, 248–261.
Thompson, C., Underwood, G., & Crundall, D. (2007). Previous attentional set can induce an attentional blink with task-irrelevant initial targets. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1603–1609.
Vachon, F., Tremblay, S., & Jones, D. M. (2007). Task-set reconfiguration suspends perceptual priming: Evidence from semantic priming during the attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 330–347.
Visser, T. A. W., Bischof, W. F., & Di Lollo, V. (2004). Rapid serial visual distraction: Task-irrelevant items can produce an attentional blink. Perception & Psychophysics, 66, 1418–1432.
Woodman, G. F., & Luck, S. J. (2007). Do the contents of visual working memory automatically influence attentional selection during visual search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 363–377.
Yantis, S., & Egeth, H. E. (1997). Visual attention: Control, representation, and time course. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 269–297.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by a National Science Foundation graduate fellowship, a Rackham Graduate Research Award, and a Pillsbury award to K.S.M., as well as by start-up funds from the University of Michigan’s Department of Psychology and an NIH grant (1R03DA021345-01) awarded to D.H.W.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moore, K.S., Weissman, D.H. Involuntary transfer of a top-down attentional set into the focus of attention: Evidence from a contingent attentional capture paradigm. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 1495–1509 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.6.1495
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.6.1495