Abstract
In the horizontal-vertical illusion (HVI), the length of the vertical line is overestimated, whereas in the bisection illusion (BI), the horizontal bisecting line is expected to be overestimated. Here, only half of our 22 observers showed the expected BI, whereas the other half underestimated the bisecting line. Observers also differed in their judgments of the strength of the HVI: The HVI was stronger for observers showing the classical bisection effect, and weaker or absent for those underestimating the bisecting line. To account for these results, we used a linear model to individually estimate the strength of two putative factors underlying both illusions. Whereas the strength of the HVI and BI were highly correlated, the estimated factors were uncorrelated. Therefore, in two control experiments, we then measured the pure horizontal-vertical (pHVI) and bisection (pBI) illusions. A significant correlation between the estimated factors and the measured illusion variants was found. Results were robust against variations of contrast, repetitive presentations, and choice of adjusted line. Thus, the classical HVI as an additive combination of two independent factors was confirmed, but we found considerable interindividual variations in the strength of the illusions. The results stress the importance of analyzing individual data rather than taking sample means for understanding these illusions.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Armstrong, L., & Marks, L. E. (1997). Differential effects of stimulus context on perceived length: Implications for the horizontal-vertical illusion. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1200–1213.
Avery, G. C., & Day, R. H. (1969). Basis of the horizontal-vertical illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 376–380.
Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357
Brosvic, G. M., & Cohen, B. D. (1988). The horizontal-vertical illusion and knowledge of results. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 67, 463–469. doi:10.2466/PMS.67.6.463-469
Chapanis, A., & Mankin, D. A. (1967). The vertical-horizontal illusion in a visually-rich environment. Perception & Psychophysics, 2, 249–255.
Day, R., & Avery, G. (1970). Absence of the horizontal-vertical illusion in haptic space. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 172–173.
Deregowski, J., & Ellis, H. D. (1972). Effect of stimulus orientation upon haptic perception of the horizontal-vertical illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 95, 14–19.
Ebbinghaus, H. (1913). Grundzüge der Physiologie 2 (Vols. 1–3). Auflage: Leipzig.
Felleman, D. J., & van Essen, D. C. (1991). Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 1, 1–47. doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1-a
Fick, A. (1851). De errone quodam optic asymmetria bulbi effecto. Marburg: Koch.
Fick, A. (1852). Erörterung eines physiologisch-optischen Phänomens. Zeitschrift für rationelle Medicin, 2, 83–94.
Finger, F. W., & Spelt, D. K. (1947). The illustration of the horizontal-vertical illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37, 243–250.
Gardner, R. W., & Long, R. I. (1960a). Errors of the standard and illusion effects with the inverted T. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 10, 47–54. doi:10.2466/PMS.10.1.47-54
Gardner, R. W., & Long, R. I. (1960b). Errors of the standard and illusion effects with L-shaped figures. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 10, 107–109. doi:10.2466/PMS.10.2.107-109
Gentaz, E., & Hatwell, Y. (2004). Geometrical haptic illusions: The role of exploration in the Müller-Lyer, vertical-horizontal, and Delboeuf illusions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 31–40.
Gregory, R. L. (1968). Perceptual illusions and brain models. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 171, 279–296.
Gregory, R. L. (1997a). Knowledge in perception and illusion. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 352, 1121–1128.
Gregory, R. L. (1997b). Visual illusions classified. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 1, 190–194. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(97)01060-7
Gregory, R. L. (2001). Perceptions of knowledge. Nature, 410, 21. doi:10.1038/35065174
Hamburger, K., Hansen, T., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2006). Geometric- optical illusions at isoluminance. In H. H. Bülthoff, S. Gillner, H. A. Mallot, & R. Ulrich (Eds.), Beiträge zur 9. Tübinger Wahrnehmungskonferenz (p. 135). Kirchentellinsfurt: Knirsch.
Hamburger, K., Hansen, T., & Gegenfurtner, K. R. (2007). Geometric-optical illusions at isoluminance. Vision Research, 47, 3276–3285. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.09.004
Heller, M. A., Calcaterra, J. A., Burson, L. L., & Green, S. L. (1997). The tactual horizontal-vertical illusion depends on radial motion of the entire arm. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1297–1311.
Heller, M. A., & Joyner, T. D. (1993). Mechanisms in the haptic horizontal- vertical illusion: Evidence from sighted and blind subjects. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 422–428.
Koffka, K. (1999). Principles of Gestalt psychology. London: Routledge. (Original work published 1935)
Künnapas, T. M. (1955). An analysis of the “vertical-horizontal” illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 134–140.
Künnapas, T. M. (1957). Vertical-horizontal illusion and surrounding field. Acta Psychologica, 13, 35–42. doi:10.1016/0001-6918 (57)90004-5
Künnapas, T. M. (1958). Fixation and the vertical-horizontal illusion. Acta Psychologica, 14, 131–136. doi:10.1016/0001-6918 (58)90010-6
Künnapas, T. M. (1959). The vertical-horizontal illusion in artificial visual fields. Journal of Psychology, 47, 41–48.
McBride, S. A., Risser, J. M., & Slotnick, B. M. (1987). The horizontal- vertical illusion: Independence of line bisection and a comparison line. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 64, 943–948. doi:10.2466/PMS.64.3.943-948
Millar, S., & Al-Attar, Z. (2000). Vertical and bisection bias in active touch. Perception, 29, 481–500. doi:10.1068/p2989
Oppel, J. J. (1855). Über geometrisch-optische Täuschungen. Jahresbericht des physikalischen Vereins zu Frankfurt am Main, 37–47.
Pan, S. (1934). The vertical-horizontal illusion. National Central Journal of Psychology, National Central University, 1, 125–128.
Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. doi:10.1163/156856897X00366
Piaget, J., Matalon, B., & Bang, V. (1961). L’evolution de l’illusion dite “verticale-horizontale” de ses composantes (rectangle et équerre) et de l’illusion de Delboeuf en presentation tachistoscopique. Archives de Psychologie, 38, 23–68.
Prinzmetal, W., & Gettleman, L. (1993). Vertical-horizontal illusion: One eye is better than two. Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 81–88.
Raudsepp, J., & Djupsjöbacka, M. (2005). Handgrip maximum force and the visual horizontal - vertical illusion. Perception, 34, 421–428. doi:10.1068/p5073
Rockland, K. S., & Pandya, D. N. (1979). Laminar origins and terminations of cortical connections of the occipital lobe in the rhesus monkey. Brain Research, 179, 3–20. doi:10.1016/0006-8993(79)90485-2
Schumann, F. (1900). Beiträge zur Analyse der Gesichtswahrnehmungen. Zeitschrift für Psychologie & Physiologie der Sinnesorgane, 24, 1–33.
Sillito, A. (1995). Chemical soup: Where and how drugs may influence visual perception. In R. L. Gregory, J. Harris, P. Heard, & D. Rose (Eds.), The artful eye (pp. 294–306). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
van Essen, D. C. (1985). Functional organization of primate visual cortex. In A. Peters & E. G. Jones (Eds.), Cerebral cortex (Vol. 3, pp. 259–329). New York: Plenum.
Westheimer, G. (2008). Illusions in the spatial sense of the eye: Geometrical- optical illusions and the neural representation of space. Vision Research, 48, 2128–2142. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.05.016
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research was supported by the German Science Foundation (Graduate Program “Neural Representation and Action Control—NeuroAct” 885/1). Parts of the results have been reported in abstract form (Hamburger, Hansen, & Gegenfurtner, 2006).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hamburger, K., Hansen, T. Analysis of individual variations in the classical horizontal-vertical illusion. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 72, 1045–1052 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.4.1045
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.72.4.1045