Abstract
Infants are often spoken to in the presence of background sounds, including speech from other talkers. In the present study, we compared 5- and 8.5-month-olds’ abilities to recognize their own names in the context of three different types of background speech: that of a single talker, multitalker babble, and that of a single talker played backward. Infants recognized their names at a 10-dB signal-to-noise ratio in the multiple-voice condition but not in the single-voice (nonreversed) condition, a pattern opposite to that of typical adult performance. Infants similarly failed to recognize their names when the background talker’s voice was reversed—that is, unintelligible, but with speech-like acoustic properties. These data suggest that infants may have difficulty segregating the components of different speech streams when those streams are acoustically too similar. Alternatively, infants’ attention may be drawn to the time-varying acoustic properties associated with a single talker’s speech, causing difficulties when a single talker is the competing sound.
Article PDF
References
Abdala, C., & Folsom, R. C. (1995). The development of frequency resolution in humans as revealed by the auditory brain-stem response recorded with notched-noise masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 96, 921–930.
Assmann, P. F., & Summerfield, Q. (1990). Modeling the perception of concurrent vowels: Vowels with different fundamental frequencies. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 680–697.
Bargones, J. Y., & Werner, L. A. (1994). Adults listen selectively; infants do not. Psychological Science, 5, 170–174.
Bargones, J. Y., Werner, L. A., & Marean, G. C. (1995). Infant psychometric functions for detection: Mechanisms of immature sensitivity. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 99–111.
Barker, B. A., & Newman, R. S. (2004). Listen to your mother! The role of talker familiarity in infant streaming. Cognition, 94, B45-B53.
Broadbent, D. E. (1952). Listening to one of two synchronous messages. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 51–55.
Brokx, J. P. L., & Nooteboom, S. G. (1982). Intonation and the perceptual separation of simultaneous voices. Journal of Phonetics, 10, 23–36.
Bronkhorst, A. M., & Plomp, R. (1992). Effect of multiple speechlike maskers on binaural speech recognition in normal and impaired hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 3132–3139.
Brungart, D. S. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 1101–1109.
Brungart, D. S., & Simpson, B. D. (2002). Within-ear and across-ear interference in a cocktail-party listening task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112, 2985–2995.
Brungart, D. S., Simpson, B. D., Darwin, C. J., Arbogast, T. L., & Kidd, G., Jr. (2005). Across-ear interference from parametrically de graded synthetic speech signals in a dichotic cocktail-party listening task. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117, 292–304.
Brungart, D. S., Simpson, B. D., Ericson, M. A., & Scott, K. R. (2001). Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 110, 2527–2538.
Carhart, R., Tillman, T. W., & Greetis, E. S. (1969). Perceptual masking in multiple sound backgrounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 45, 694–703.
Carhart, R., Tillman, T. W., & Johnson, K. R. (1966). Binaural masking of speech by periodically modulated noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 39, 1037–1050.
Chalikia, M. H., & Bregman, A. S. (1989). The perceptual segregation of simultaneous auditory signals: Pulse train segregation and vowel segregation. Perception & Psychophysics, 46, 487–496.
Cherry, E. C. (1953). Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 25, 975–979.
Colombo, J. A., & Bundy, R. S. (1981). A method for the measurement of infant auditory selectivity. Infant Behavior & Development, 4, 219–223.
Cooke, M., Garcia Lecumberri, M. L., & Barker, J. (2008). The foreign language cocktail party problem: Energetic and informational masking effects in non-native speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123, 414–427.
Cullington, H. E., & Zeng, F.-G. (2008). Speech recognition with varying numbers and types of competing talkers by normal-hearing, cochlear-implant, and implant simulation subjects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123, 450–461.
Dirks, D. D., & Bower, D. R. (1969). Masking effects of speech competing messages. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 12, 229–245.
Drullman, R., & Bronkhorst, A. W. (2000). Multichannel speech intelligibility and talker recognition using monaural, binaural, and three-dimensional auditory presentation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2224–2235.
Drullman, R., & Bronkhorst, A. W. (2004). Speech perception and talker segregation: Effects of level, pitch, and tactile support with multiple simultaneous talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 116, 3090–3098.
Durlach, N. (2006). Auditory masking: Need for improved conceptual structure. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120, 1787–1790.
Eich, E. (1984). Memory for unattended events: Remembering with and without awareness. Memory & Cognition, 12, 105–111.
Festen, J. M., & Plomp, R. (1990). Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 1725–1736.
Gallun, F. J., Mason, C. R., & Kidd, G., Jr. (2007). The ability to listen with independent ears. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, 2814–2825.
Garcia Lecumberri, M. L., & Cooke, M.. (2006). Effect of masker type on native and non-native consonant perception in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 2445–2454.
Glenn, S. M., Cunningham, C. C., & Joyce, P. F. (1981). A study of auditory preferences in nonhandicapped infants and infants with Down’s syndrome. Child Development, 52, 1303–1307.
Golden, M. V., & Frank, T. (2000). Further acoustical analysis of infant/toddler rooms in daycare centers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2833.
Gustafsson, H. Å., & Arlinger, S. D. (1994). Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 518–529.
Hirsh, I. J. (1950). The relation between localization and intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 196–200.
Hollich, G., Newman, R. S., & Jusczyk, P. W. (2005). Infants’ use of synchronized visual information to separate streams of speech. Child Development, 76, 598–613.
Hygge, S., Rönnberg, J., Larsby, B., & Arlinger, S. (1992). Normalhearing and hearing-impaired subjects’ ability to just follow conversation in competing speech, reversed speech, and noise backgrounds. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 35, 208–215.
Kidd, G., Jr., Mason, C. R., & Arbogast, T. L. (2002). Similarity, uncertainty, and masking in the identification of nonspeech auditory patterns. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 111, 1367–1376.
Kidd, G., Jr., Mason, C. R., Deliwala, P. S., Woods, W. S., & Colburn, H. S. (1994). Reducing informational masking by sound segregation. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 3475–3480.
Leibold, L. J., & Werner, L. A. (2006). Effect of masker-frequency variability on the detection performance of infants and adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, 3960–3970.
Lutfi, R. A., Kistler, D. J., Oh, E. L., Wightman, F. L., & Callahan, M. R. (2003). One factor underlies individual differences in auditory informational masking within and across age groups. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 396–406.
MacKay, D. G. (1973). Aspects of the theory of comprehension, memory and attention. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25, 22–40.
Manlove, E. E., Frank, T., & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2001). Why should we care about noise in classrooms and child care settings? Child & Youth Care Forum, 30, 55–64.
Mayo, L. H., Florentine, M., & Buus, S. (1997). Age of secondlanguage acquisition and perception of speech in noise. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 40, 686–693.
Miller, G. A., & Licklider, J. C. R. (1950). The intelligibility of interrupted speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 22, 167–173.
Newman, R. S. (2005). The cocktail party effect in infants revisited: Listening to one’s name in noise. Developmental Psychology, 41, 352–362.
Newman, R. S., & Jusczyk, P. W. (1996). The cocktail party effect in infants. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 1145–1156.
Nozza, R. J., Miller, S. L., Rossman, R. N. F., & Bond, L. C. (1991). Reliability and validity of infant speech-sound discrimination-in-noise thresholds. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 34, 643–650.
Nozza, R. J., Rossman, R. N. F., & Bond, L. C. (1991). Infant-adult differences in unmasked thresholds for the discrimination of consonant-vowel syllable pairs. Audiology, 30, 102–112.
Nozza, R. J., Rossman, R. N. F., Bond, L. C., & Miller, S. L. (1990). Infant speech-sound discrimination in noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87, 339–350.
Nozza, R. J., & Wilson, W. R. (1984). Masked and unmasked pure-tone thresholds of infants and adults: Development of auditory frequency selectivity and sensitivity. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 27, 613–622.
Oh, E. L., Wightman, F. L., & Lutfi, R. A. (2001). Children’s detection of pure-tone signals with random multitone maskers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2888–2895.
Olsho, L. W. (1985). Infant auditory perception: Tonal masking. Infant Behavior & Development, 8, 371–384.
Polka, L., Rvachew, S., & Molnar, M.. (2008). Perceiving speech in the presence of other sounds poses a cognitive challenge for young infants. Infancy, 13, 421–439.
Pollack, I., & Pickett, J. M. (1958). Stereophonic listening and speech intelligibility against voice babble. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 30, 131–133.
Poulton, E. C. (1953). Two-channel listening. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 91–96.
Ramus, F., Hauser, M. D., Miller, C., Morris, D., & Mehler, J. (2000). Language discrimination by human newborns and by cottontop tamarin monkeys. Science, 28, 349–351.
Ribeiro, F. M., & Carvallo, R. M.. (2008). Tone-evoked ABR in fullterm and preterm neonates with normal hearing. International Journal of Audiology, 47, 21–29.
Scheffers, M. T. M.. (1982). The role of pitch in the perceptual separation of simultaneous vowels II. IPO Annual Progress Report, 17, 41–45.
Scheffers, M. T. M. (1983). Sifting vowels: Auditory pitch analysis and sound segregation. Unpublished thesis, University of Groningen.
Schneider, B. A., Morrongiello, B. A., & Trehub, S. E. (1990). Size of critical band in infants, children, and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 16, 642–652.
Schneider, B. A., Trehub, S. E., Morrongiello, B. A., & Thorpe, L. A. (1989). Developmental changes in masked thresholds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 86, 1733–1742.
Simpson, S. A., & Cooke, M. (2005). Consonant identification in N-talker babble is a nonmonotonic function of N. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 2775–2778.
Spetner, N. B., & Olsho, L. W. (1990). Auditory frequency resolution in human infancy. Child Development, 61, 632–652.
Spieth, W., Curtis, J. F., & Webster, J. C. (1954). Responding to one of two simultaneous messages. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 26, 391–396.
Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662.
Summers, V., & Molis, M. R. (2004). Speech recognition in fluctuating and continuous maskers: Effects of hearing loss and presentation level. Journal of Speech, Language, & Hearing Research, 47, 245–256.
Takahashi, G. A., & Bacon, S. P. (1992). Modulation detection, modulation masking, and speech understanding in noise in the elderly. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 35, 1410–1421.
Takata, Y., & Nábelek, A. K. (1990). English consonant recognition in noise and in reverberation by Japanese and American listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88, 663–666.
Treisman, A. M. (1960). Contextual cues in selective listening. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 242–248.
Van de Weijer, J. (1998). Language input for word discovery. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Ponsen & Looijen.
Vouloumanos, A., & Werker, J. F. (2004). Tuned to the signal: The privileged status of speech for young infants. Developmental Science, 7, 270–276.
Vouloumanos, A., & Werker, J. F. (2007). Listening to language at birth: Evidence for a bias for speech in neonates. Developmental Science, 10, 159–164.
Werner, L. A., & Bargones, J. Y. (1992). Psychoacoustic development of human infants. Advances in Infancy Research, 7, 103–145.
Werner, L. A., & Boike, K. (2001). Infants’ sensitivity to broadband noise. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 109, 2103–2111.
Wightman, F. L., Callahan, M. R., Lutfi, R. A., Kistler, D. J., & Oh, E. (2003). Children’s detection of pure-tone signals: Informational masking with contralateral maskers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113, 3297–3305.
Wilson, R. H., & Carhart, R. (1969). Influence of pulsed masking on the threshold for spondees. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 46, 998–1010.
Wood, N. [L.], & Cowan, N. (1995). The cocktail party phenomenon revisited: How frequent are attention shifts to one’s name in an irrelevant auditory channel? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 255–260.
Wood, N. L., Stadler, M. A., & Cowan, N. (1997). Is there implicit memory without attention? A reexamination of task demands in Eich’s (1984) procedure. Memory & Cognition, 25, 772–779.
Zwicker, U. T. (1984). Auditory recognition of diotic and dichotic vowel pairs. Speech Communication, 3, 265–277.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Newman, R.S. Infants’ listening in multitalker environments: Effect of the number of background talkers. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 822–836 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.4.822
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.4.822