Skip to main content
Download PDF

Conditions required for binocular rivalry suppression

Perception & Psychophysics volume 71, pages 174–182 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

When the two eyes are presented with incompatible stimuli, the two monocular stimuli are seen alternately in a never-ending cycle. It is now widely accepted that the neural processes underlying this phenomenon, binocular rivalry, are distributed across a number of cortical stages. It is not clear, however, where binocular rivalry is initiated. We performed two experiments whose aim was to clarify this issue. In the first experiment, rivalry was induced, and brief test stimuli were delivered to an eye while its inducing stimulus was either dominant or suppressed. Sensitivity to a test stimulus with features similar to those of the suppressed inducing stimulus was reduced only when the test was presented to the eye whose inducing stimulus was suppressed. This indicates that suppression of a monocular channel is a prerequisite for binocular rivalry suppression. The second experiment showed that to induce rivalry, local interocular stimulus incompatibilities were necessary and that conflicting global percepts were not sufficient. These results suggest that low-level visual processes are required for the initiation of binocular rivalry.

References

  • Alais, D., & Parker, A. (2006). Independent binocular rivalry processes for motion and form. Neuron, 52, 911–920. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.10.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R., & Camisa, J. (1979). On the inhibitory nature of binocular rivalry suppression. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 5, 315–323. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.5.2.315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R., & Fox, R. (1974a). Adaptation to invisible gratings and the site of binocular rivalry suppression. Nature, 249, 488–490. doi:10.1038/249488a0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R., & Fox, R. (1974b). Binocular rivalry suppression: Insensitive to spatial frequency and orientation change. Vision Research, 14, 687–692. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(74)90065-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R., & Logothetis, N. K. (2002). Visual competition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3, 13–21. doi:10.1038/nrn701

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R., Tadin, D., Sobel, K. V., Raissian, T. A., & Chong, S. C. (2006). Strength of early visual adaptation depends on visual awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 4783–4788. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509634103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blake, R., Westendorf, D. H., & Overton, R. (1980). What is suppressed during binocular rivalry? Perception, 9, 223–231. doi:10.1068/p090223

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blakemore, C. [B.], & Campbell, F. W. (1969). On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images. Journal of Physiology, 203, 237–260.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi:10.1163/156856897X00357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhalter, A., & Van Essen, D. C. (1986). Processing of color, form and disparity information in visual areas VP and V2 of ventral extrastriate cortex in the macaque monkey. Journal of Neuroscience, 6, 2327–2351.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cagenello, R., Arditi, A., & Halpern, D. L. (1993). Binocular enhancement of visual acuity. Journal of the Optical Society of America A, 10, 1841–1848. doi:10.1364/JOSAA.10.001841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, F. W., Gilinsky, A. S., Howell, E. R., Riggs, L. A., & Atkinson, J. (1973). The dependence of monocular rivalry on orientation. Perception, 2, 123–125. doi:10.1068/p020123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., & He, S. (2004). Local factors determine the stabilization of monocular ambiguous and binocular rivalry stimuli. Current Biology, 14, 1013–1017. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.05.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Caneja, E. (1928). Sur l'alternance binoculaire. Annales d'Oculistique, 165, 721–731. [Translated by Alais, D., O'Shea, R. P., Mesana-Alais, C., & Wilson, I. G. (2000). On binocular alternation. Perception, 29, 1437–1445. doi:10.1068/p3017]

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, F., & He, S. (2005). Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1380–1385. doi:10.1038/nn1537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A. W. (2005). Multistage model for binocular rivalry. Journal of Neurophysiology, 94, 4412–4420. doi:10.1152/jn.00557.2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, A. W., & Li, D. F. (2004, October). Binocular rivalry: Feature suppression requires eye suppression. Paper presented at the 34th Annual Meeting of the Society for Neuroscience, San Diego.

  • Gallant, J. L., Braun, J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1993). Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex. Science, 259, 100–103. doi:10.1126/science.8418487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, J.-D., Deichmann, R., & Rees, G. (2005). Eye-specific effects of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature, 438, 496–499. doi:10.1038/nature04169

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hess, R. F., Wang, Y.-Z., & Dakin, S. C. (1999). Are judgements of circularity local or global? Vision Research, 39, 4354–4360. doi:10.1016/ S0042-6989(99)00153-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kovács, I., Papathomas, T. V., Yang, M., & Fehér, Á. (1996). When the brain changes its mind: Interocular grouping during binocular rivalry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 15508–15511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. K., Itti, L., Koch, C., & Braun, J. (1999). Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 375–381. doi:10.1038/7286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-H., & Blake, R. (1999). Rival ideas about binocular rivalry. Vision Research, 39, 1447–1454. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00269-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, D. A., & Logothetis, N. K. (1996). Activity changes in early visual cortex reflect monkeys' percepts during binocular rivalry. Nature, 379, 549–553. doi:10.1038/379549a0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logothetis, N. K., Leopold, D. A., & Sheinberg, D. L. (1996). What is rivalling during binocular rivalry? Nature, 380, 621–624. doi:10.1038/380621a0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meng, M., & Tong, F. (2004). Can attention selectively bias bistable perception? Differences between binocular rivalry and ambiguous figures. Journal of Vision, 4, 539–551. doi:10.1167/4.7.2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, V. A., Freeman, A. W., & Alais, D. (2003). Increasing depth of binocular rivalry suppression along two visual pathways. Vision Research, 43, 2003–2008. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00314-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, V. A., Freeman, A. W., & Wenderoth, P. (2001). The depth and selectivity of suppression in binocular rivalry. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 348–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O'Shea, R. P., & Crassini, B. (1981). The sensitivity of binocular rivalry suppression to changes in orientation assessed by reaction-time and forced-choice techniques. Perception, 10, 283–293. doi:10.1068/p100283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437–442. doi:10.1163/156856897X00366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J. H., Alborzian, S., & Stoner, G. R. (2003). Exogenously cued attention triggers competitive selection of surfaces. Vision Research, 43, 59–66. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00403-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riesenhuber, M., & Poggio, T. (1999). Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 1019–1025. doi:10.1038/14819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sheinberg, D. L., & Logothetis, N. K. (1997). The role of temporal cortical areas in perceptual organization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94, 3408–3413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, F., & Engel, S. A. (2001). Interocular rivalry revealed in the human cortical blind-spot representation. Nature, 411, 195–199. doi:10.1038/35075583

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, F., Nakayama, K., Vaughan, J. T., & Kanwisher, N. (1998). Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex. Neuron, 21, 753–759. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80592-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valdes-Sosa, M., Cobo, A., & Pinilla, T. (2000). Attention to object files defined by transparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 26, 488–505. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.26.2.488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wales, R., & Fox, R. (1970). Increment detection thresholds during binocular rivalry suppression. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 90–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, A. B., & Pelli, D. G. (1983). QUEST: A Bayesian adaptive psychometric method. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 113–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, T. L., Pearson, J., & Clifford, C. W. G. (2004). Perceptual grouping of biological motion promotes binocular rivalry. Current Biology, 14, 1670–1674. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.08.064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilke, M., Logothetis, N. K., & Leopold, D. A. (2006). Local field potential reflects perceptual suppression in monkey visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 103, 17507–17512. doi:10.1073/pnas.0604673103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, F., James, T. W., Wilson, H. R., Gati, J. S., Menon, R. S., & Goodale, M. A. (2000). An fMRI study of the selective activation of human extrastriate form vision areas by radial and concentric gratings. Current Biology, 10, 1455–1458. doi:10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00800-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, H. R. (2003). Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100, 14499–14503. doi:10.1073/pnas.2333622100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J. M. (1984). Reversing ocular dominance and suppression in a single flash. Vision Research, 24, 471–478. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(84)90044-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wunderlich, K., Schneider, K. A., & Kastner, S. (2005). Neural correlates of binocular rivalry in the human lateral geniculate nucleus. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1595–1602. doi:10.1038/nn1554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. School of Medical Sciences, University of Sydney, P.O. Box 170, 1825, Lidcombe, NSW, Australia

    Alan W. Freeman & David F. Li

Authors
  1. Alan W. Freeman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David F. Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alan W. Freeman.

Additional information

Note—Accepted by the previous editorial team, when Thomas H. Carr was Editor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freeman, A.W., Li, D.F. Conditions required for binocular rivalry suppression. Perception, & Psychophysics 71, 174–182 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.1.174

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/APP.71.1.174

Keywords

  • Test Stimulus
  • Primary Visual Cortex
  • Binocular Rivalry
  • Feature Suppression
  • Induce Stimulus