Quantity, not quality: the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity

Abstract

A key motivation for understanding capacity in working memory (WM) is its relationship with fluid intelligence. Recent evidence has suggested a two-factor model that distinguishes between the number of representations that can be maintained in WM and the resolution of those representations. To determine how these factors relate to fluid intelligence, we conducted an exploratory factor analysis on multiple number-limited and resolution-limited measures of WM ability. The results strongly supported the two-factor model, with fully orthogonal factors accounting for performance in the number-limited and resolution-limited conditions. Furthermore, the reliable relationship between WM capacity and fluid intelligence was exclusively supported by the number factor (r=.66), whereas the resolution factor made no reliable contribution (r=−.05). Thus, the relationship between WM capacity and standard measures of fluid intelligence is mediated by the number of representations that can be simultaneously maintained in WM, rather than by the precision of those representations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Awh, E., Barton, B., & Vogel, E. K. (2007). Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items, regardless of complexity. Psychological Science, 18, 622–628.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barton, B., Ester, E. F., & Awh, E. (2009). Discrete resource allocation in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 1359–1367.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Colom, R., Flores-Mendoza, C., Quiroga, M. Á., & Privado, J. (2005). Working memory and general intelligence: The role of shortterm storage. Personality & Individual Differences, 39, 1005–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24, 87–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cowan, N., Chen, Z., & Rouder, J. N. (2004). Constant capacity in an immediate serial-recall task: A logical sequel to Miller (1956). Psychological Science, 15, 634–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cowan, N., Elliott, E. M., Saults, J. S., Morey, C. C., Mattox, S. M., Hismjatullina, A., & Conway, A. R. A. (2005). On the capacity of attention: Its estimation and its role in working memory and cognitive aptitudes. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 42–100.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cowan, N., Fristoe, N. M., Elliott, E. M., Brunner, R. P., & Saults, J. S. (2006). Scope of attention, control of attention, and intelligence in children and adults. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1754–1768.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cowan, N., Morey, C. C., AuBuchon, A. M., Zwilling, C. E., & Gilchrist, A. L. (2010). Seven-year-olds allocate attention like adults unless working memory is overloaded. Developmental Science, 13, 120–133.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Cusack, R., Lehmann, M., Veldsman, M., & Mitchell, D. J. (2009). Encoding strategy and not visual working memory capacity correlates with intelligence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 641–647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 19–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Engle, R. W., Tuholski, S. W., Laughlin, J., & Conway, A. R. A. (1999). Working memory, short-term memory and general fluid intelligence: A latent variable model approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 128, 309–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fukuda, K., & Vogel, E. K. (2009). Human variation in overriding attentional capture. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8726–8733.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gold, J. M., Fuller, R. L., Robinson, B. M., McMahon, R. P., Braun, E. L., & Luck, S. J. (2006). Intact attentional control of working memory encoding in schizophrenia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 115, 658–673.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Halford, G. S., Cowan, N., & Andrews, G. (2007). Separating cognitive capacity from knowledge: A new hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 236–242.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Jiang, Y. V., Shim, W. M., & Makovski, T. (2008). Visual working memory for line orientations and face identities. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 1581–1591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (1997). An overview of the EPIC architecture for cognition and performance with application to human-computer interaction. Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 391–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kyllonen, P. C., & Christal, R. E. (1990). Reasoning ability is (little more than) working-memory capacity?! Intelligence, 14, 389–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K. (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390, 279–281.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McCollough, A. W., Machizawa, M. G., & Vogel, E. K. (2007). Electrophysiological measures of maintaining representations in visual working memory. Cortex, 43, 77–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. McNab, F., & Klingberg, T. (2008). Prefrontal cortex and basal ganglia control access to working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 103–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mogle, J. A., Lovett, B. J., Stawski, R. S., & Sliwinski, M. J. (2008). What’s so special about working memory? An examination of the relationships among working memory, secondary memory, and fluid intelligence. Psychological Science, 19, 1071–1077.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 44, 369–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Scolari, M., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2008). Perceptual expertise enhances the resolution but not the number of representations in working memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 215–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Todd, J. J., & Marois, R. (2004). Capacity limit of visual short-term memory in human posterior parietal cortex. Nature, 428, 751–754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Todd, J. J., & Marois, R. (2005). Posterior parietal cortex activity predicts individual differences in visual short-term memory capacity. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5, 144–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Turner, M. L., & Engle, R. W. (1989). Is working memory capacity task dependent? Journal of Memory & Language, 28, 127–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007a). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114, 104–132.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Unsworth N., & Engle, R. W. (2007b). On the division of short-term and working memory: An examination of simple and complex spans and their relation to higher order abilities. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 1038–1066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Vogel, E. K., & Machizawa, M. G. (2004). Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity. Nature, 428, 748–751.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438, 500–503.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu, Y., & Chun, M. M. (2006). Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. Nature, 440, 91–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward Awh.

Additional information

Portions of this work were supported by Grant NIH-R01MH087214-01 to E.A. and E.V. We thank Nash Unsworth for valuable discussion of these findings.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fukuda, K., Vogel, E., Mayr, U. et al. Quantity, not quality: the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory capacity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 17, 673–679 (2010). https://doi.org/10.3758/17.5.673

Download citation

Keywords

  • Work Memory
  • Work Memory Capacity
  • Fluid Intelligence
  • Complex Span
  • Change Trial