Normative data for Chinese-English paired associates
Paired-associate learning is one of the most commonly used paradigms to study human memory. In many of these studies, participants are typically told to learn foreign language–English translations, such as Swahili–English or Lithuanian–English pairs. One limitation of these currently available foreign language–English translation norms is that their foreign languages are based on the alphabetic writing system, thereby preventing researchers from generalizing their findings to languages based on logographic writing systems. In the present study we collected normative data for 160 Chinese–English word pairs. Participants completed three study–test cycles, followed by metacognitive judgments on their learning experience. For each pair, we report recall performance, recall latency, ease of learning, and judgments of learning. A simultaneous multiple regression analysis with frequency (of both the English word and the Chinese character), word length (English), and number of strokes (Chinese) as predictors revealed that a greater number of strokes (or higher visual complexity) for the Chinese characters predicted lower target recall.
KeywordsPaired associates Chinese–English translations Cued recall Episodic memory
We thank Silvia Caamano, Jessica Cantu, Erin Chaniago, Jennifer A. Lara, Nikolas Morgan, Monica Orellana, and Elizabeth Ruiz-Harris for their assistance in collecting data for the study.
- Balota, D. (1994). Visual word recognition: The journey from features to meaning. In M. A. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 303–356). San Diego, CA: Academic PressGoogle Scholar
- Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., . . . Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193014
- Carpenter, S. K. (2011). Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 1547–1552. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024140 Google Scholar
- Cho, K. W., Neely, J. H., Brennan, M. K., Vitrano, D., & Crocco, S. (2017). Does testing increase spontaneous mediation in learning semantically related paired associates? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 1768–1778. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000414.Google Scholar
- Cho, K. W., & Powers, A. (2019). Testing enhances both memorization and conceptual learning of categorical materials. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2019.01.003
- Cuetos, F., Glez-Nosti, M., Barbón, A., & Brysbaert, M. (2011). SUBTLEX-ESP: Spanish word frequencies based on film subtitles. Psicologica, 32, 133–143.Google Scholar
- Hoosain, R. (1991). Psycholinguistic implications for linguistic relativity: A case study of Chinese. Hillsdale, NJ: ErlbaumGoogle Scholar
- MDBG. (2018). CC-CEDICT [Machine-readable dictionary]. Retrieved October 5, 2018, from https://www.mdbg.net/chinese/dictionary?page=radicals
- Psychology Software Tools, Inc. (2002). E-Prime 2.0 (Software). Retrieved from www.pstnet.com
- Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). Visual word recognition: An overview. In P. Eimas & J. L. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition: Language (pp. 137–179). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Tse, C.-S., Yap, M. J., Chan, Y. L., Sze, W. P., Shaoul, C., & Lin, D. (2017). The Chinese Lexicon Project: A megastudy of lexical decision performance for 25,000+ traditional Chinese two-character compound words. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 1503–1519. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0810-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Wartenweiler, D. (2011). Testing effect for visual-symbolic material: Enhancing the learning of Filipino children of low socio-economic status in the public school system. International Journal of Research and Review, 6, 74–93.Google Scholar