Advertisement

Do your eyes give you away? A validation study of eye-movement measures used as indicators for mindless reading

  • Lena SteindorfEmail author
  • Jan Rummel
Article

Abstract

Identifying eye-movement measures as objective indicators of mind wandering seems to be a work in progress. We reviewed research comparing eye movements during self-categorized episodes of normal versus mindless reading and found little consensus regarding the specific measures that are sensitive to attentional decoupling during mind wandering. To address this issue of inconsistency, we conducted a new, high-powered eye-tracking experiment and considered all previously identified mind-wandering indicators. In our experiment, only three measures (reading time, fixation count, and first-fixation duration) positively predicted self-categorized mindless reading. Aside from these single measures, the word-frequency effect was found to be generally less pronounced during mindless-reading than during normal-reading episodes. To additionally test for convergent validity between the objective and subjective mind-wandering measures, we utilized eye-movement measures as well as thought reports, to examine the effect of metacognitive awareness on mind-wandering behavior. We expected that participants anticipating a difficult comprehension test would mind wander less during reading than would those anticipating an easy test. Although we were able to induce metacognitive expectancies about task difficulty, we found no evidence that these difficulty expectancies affected either subjectively reported or objectively measured mind wandering.

Keywords

Mind wandering Task-unrelated thought Eye movements Reading 

Notes

Author note

The present research was supported by a grant from the German Research Foundation (DFG) to the second author (Grant No. RU1996/1-1). The authors thank Nadine Gronewold, Amelie Haindl, Fynn Ole Wöstenfeld, Fabian Dittmar, and Holly Hammerton for their help in data collection, with special thanks to Holly for also proofreading the manuscript.

References

  1. Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., Kam, J. W. Y., Franklin, M. S., & Schooler, J. W. (2012). Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science, 23, 1117–1122.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612446024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, C. L., Roberts, D. M., Barragan, D., Lee, J. D., Lerner, N., & Higgins, J. S. (2017). Detecting and quantifying mind wandering during simulated driving. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11, 406.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2017.00406 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48.  https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cho, H.-C., & Abe, S. (2013). Is two-tailed testing for directional research hypotheses tests legitimate? Journal of Business Research, 66, 1261–1266.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2012.02.023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christoff, K., Gordon, A. M., Smallwood, J., Smith, R., & Schooler, J. W. (2009). Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 8719–8724.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900234106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Devi, M. S., & Bajaj, P. R. (2008, July). Driver fatigue detection based on eye tracking. Paper presented at the 2008 First International Conference on Emerging Trends in Engineering and Technology, Nagpur, India.Google Scholar
  8. Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R. (2005). SWIFT: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Psychological Review, 112, 777–813.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.4.777 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Faber, M., Bixler, R., & D’Mello, S. K. (2018). An automated behavioral measure of mind wandering during computerized reading. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 134–150.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0857-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foulsham, T., Farley, J., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Mind wandering in sentence reading: Decoupling the link between mind and eye. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 51–59.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030217 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Frank, D. J., Nara, B., Zavagnin, M., Touron, D. R., & Kane, M. J. (2015). Validating older adults’ reports of less mind-wandering: An examination of eye movements and dispositional influences. Psychology and Aging, 30, 266–278.  https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000031 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Franklin, M. S., Broadway, J. M., Mrazek, M. D., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). Window to the wandering mind: Pupillometry of spontaneous thought while reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2289–2294.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.858170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Franklin, M. S., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2011). Catching the mind in flight: Using behavioral indices to detect mindless reading in real time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 992–997.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-011-0109-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Grandchamp, R., Braboszcz, C., & Delorme, A. (2014). Oculometric variations during mind wandering. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 31.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00031 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Heister, J., Würzner, K. M., Bubenzer, J., Pohl, E., Hanneforth, T., Geyken, A., & Kliegl, R. (2011). dlexDB—A lexical database for the psychological and linguistic research. Psychologische Rundschau, 62, 10–20.  https://doi.org/10.1026/0033-3042/a000029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 431–439.  https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03208203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kane, M. J., Gross, G. M., Chun, C. A., Smeekens, B. A., Meier, M. E., Silvia, P. J., & Kwapil, T. R. (2017). For whom the mind wanders, and when, varies across laboratory and daily-life settings. Psychological Science, 28, 1271–1289.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617706086 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Killingsworth, M. A., & Gilbert, D. T. (2010). A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science, 330, 932–932.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1192439 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Klinger, E. (1999). Thought flow: Properties and mechanisms underlying shifts in content At play in the fields of consciousness: Essays in honor of Jerome L. Singer (pp. 29–50). Mahwah, NJ, US: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  22. Maas, C. J. M., & Hox, J. J. (2005). Sufficient sample sizes for multilevel modeling. Methodology, 1, 86–92.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.1.3.86 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2009). Conducting the train of thought: Working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 196–204.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014104 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Drifting from slow to “d’oh!”: Working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 525–549.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025896 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Mooneyham, B. W., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). The costs and benefits of mind-wandering: A review. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 11–18.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031569 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2009). Mindless reading revisited: An analysis based on the SWIFT model of eye-movement control. Vision Research, 49, 322–336.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2008.10.022 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Nyström, M., & Holmqvist, K. (2010). An adaptive algorithm for fixation, saccade, and glissade detection in eyetracking data. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 188–204.  https://doi.org/10.3758/brm.42.1.188 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Paccagnella, O. (2011). Sample size and accuracy of estimates in multilevel models. Methodology, 7, 111–120.  https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Pinheiro, J., Bates, D., DebRoy, S., Sarkar, D., & R Development Core Team. (2010). nlme: Linear and nonlinear mixed effects models. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme
  30. Pollatsek, A., Reichle, E. D., & Rayner, K. (2006). Tests of the E-Z Reader model: Exploring the interface between cognition and eye-movement control. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 1–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.06.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Powell, M. J. D. (2009). The BOBYQA algorithm for bound constrained optimization without derivatives (Cambridge NA Report 2009/NA06, pp. 26–46). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Centre for Mathematical Sciences.Google Scholar
  32. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 372–422.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.3.372 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Rayner, K., & Fischer, M. H. (1996). Mindless reading revisited: Eye movements during reading and scanning are different. Perception & Psychophysics, 58, 734–747.  https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03213106 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Reichle, E. D., Reineberg, A. E., & Schooler, J. W. (2010). Eye movements during mindless reading. Psychological Science, 21, 1300–1310.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610378686 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Robertson, I. H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B. T., & Yiend, J. (1997). `Oops!’: Performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 747–758.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(97)00015-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rummel, J., & Boywitt, C. D. (2014). Controlling the stream of thought: Working memory capacity predicts adjustment of mind-wandering to situational demands. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 1309–1315.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-013-0580-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Rummel, J., & Nied, L. (2017). Do drives drive the train of thought?—Effects of hunger and sexual arousal on mind-wandering behavior. Consciousness and Cognition, 55, 179–187.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.08.013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Sacks, O. (2008). Fantasie nach Noten: Über musikalische Vorstellungskraft und die Macht der Töne. Gehirn und Geist, 6, 48–55.Google Scholar
  39. Sanders, J. G., Wang, H.-T., Schooler, J., & Smallwood, J. (2017). Can I get me out of my head? Exploring strategies for controlling the self-referential aspects of the mind-wandering state during reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 1053–1062.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1216573 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schad, D. J., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2012). Your mind wanders weakly, your mind wanders deeply: Objective measures reveal mindless reading at different levels. Cognition, 125, 179–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2012.07.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Schooler, J. W., Mrazek, M. D., Franklin, M. S., Baird, B., Mooneyham, B. W., Zedelius, C., & Broadway, J. M. (2014). The middle way: Finding the balance between mindfulness and mind-wandering. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 60, pp. 1–33). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  42. Schooler, J. W., Reichle, E. D., & Halpern, D. V. (2004). Zoning out during reading: Evidence for dissociations between experience and metaconsciousness. In D. T. Levin (Ed.), Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children (pp. 204–226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., & Sayette, M. A. (2011). Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 319–326.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.006 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Seli, P., Risko, E. F., Smilek, D., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Mind-wandering with and without intention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20, 605–617.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2012). A 21 word solution. Dialogue: The Official Newsletter of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, 26(2), 4–7.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2160588 Google Scholar
  46. Smallwood, J. (2011). Mind-wandering while reading: Attentional decoupling, mindless reading and the cascade model of inattention. Language and Linguistics Compass, 5, 63–77.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00263.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Smallwood, J., & Andrews-Hanna, J. (2013). Not all minds that wander are lost: The importance of a balanced perspective on the mind-wandering state. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 441.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00441 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Smallwood, J., Baracaia, S. F., Lowe, M., & Obonsawin, M. (2003). Task unrelated thought whilst encoding information. Consciousness and Cognition, 12, 452–484.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00018-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Smallwood, J., Brown, K. S., Tipper, C., Giesbrecht, B., Franklin, M. S., Mrazek, M. D., . . . Schooler, J. W. (2011). Pupillometric evidence for the decoupling of attention from perceptual input during offline thought. PLoS ONE, 6, e18298.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0018298
  50. Smallwood, J., Davies, J. B., Heim, D., Finnigan, F., Sudberry, M., O’Connor, R., & Obonsawin, M. (2004). Subjective experience and the attentional lapse: Task engagement and disengagement during sustained attention. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 657–690.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2004.06.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1144–1150.  https://doi.org/10.3758/mc.36.6.1144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Smallwood, J., O’Connor, R. C., Sudbery, M. V., & Obonsawin, M. (2007). Mind-wandering and dysphoria. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 816–842.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930600911531 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 946–958.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.946 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Smeekens, B. A., & Kane, M. J. (2016). Working memory capacity, mind wandering, and creative cognition: An individual-differences investigation into the benefits of controlled versus spontaneous thought. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10, 389–415.  https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000046 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Smilek, D., Carriere, J. S. A., & Cheyne, J. A. (2010). Out of mind, out of sight: Eye blinking as indicator and embodiment of mind wandering. Psychological Science, 21, 786–789.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610368063 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Stawarczyk, D., Majerus, S., Maquet, P., & D’Argembeau, A. (2011). Neural correlates of ongoing conscious experience: Both task-unrelatedness and stimulus-independence are related to default network activity. PLoS ONE, 6, e16997.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016997 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  57. Steindorf, L., & Rummel, J. (2017). “I should not forget the apples!”—Mind-wandering episodes used as opportunities for rehearsal in an interrupted recall paradigm. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 31, 424–430.  https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3328 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Unsworth, N., & McMillan, B. D. (2014). Similarities and differences between mind-wandering and external distraction: A latent variable analysis of lapses of attention and their relation to cognitive abilities. Acta Psychologica, 150, 14–25.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.04.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Uzzaman, S., & Joordens, S. (2011). The eyes know what you are thinking: Eye movements as an objective measure of mind wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1882–1886.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.09.010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Vinski, M. T., & Watter, S. (2012). Priming honesty reduces subjective bias in self-report measures of mind wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 451–455. doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.11.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Wang, L., & Maxwell, S. E. (2015). On disaggregating between-person and within-person effects with longitudinal data using multilevel models. Psychological Methods, 20, 63–83.  https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000030 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Weinstein, Y. (2018). Mind-wandering, how do I measure thee with probes? Let me count the ways. Behavior Research Methods, 50, 642–661.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0891-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Weinstein, Y., De Lima, H. J., & van der Zee, T. (2018). Are you mind-wandering, or is your mind on task? The effect of probe framing on mind-wandering reports. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 754–760.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1322-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wu, Z., Huang, N. E., Long, S. R., & Peng, C.-K. (2007). On the trend, detrending, and variability of nonlinear and nonstationary time series. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 14889–14894.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0701020104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yang, S.-N. (2006). An oculomotor-based model of eye movements in reading: The competition/interaction model. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 56–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2005.07.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyHeidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations