Advertisement

Behavior Research Methods

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 235–242 | Cite as

Are mind wandering rates an artifact of the probe-caught method? Using self-caught mind wandering in the classroom to test, and reject, this possibility

  • Trish L. Varao-SousaEmail author
  • Alan Kingstone
Article

Abstract

Mind wandering (MW) reports often rely on individuals responding to specific external thought probes. Researchers have used this probe-caught method almost exclusively, due to its reliability across a wide range of testing situations. However, it remains an open question whether the probe-caught MW rates in more complex settings converge with those for simpler tasks, because of the rather artificial and controlled nature of the probe-caught methodology itself, which is shared across the different settings. To address this issue, we measured MW in a real-world lecture, during which students indicated whether they were mind wandering by simply catching themselves (as one would normally do in real life) or by catching themselves and responding to thought probes. Across three separate lectures, self-caught MW reports were stable and unaffected by the inclusion of MW probes. That the probe rates were similar to those found in prior classroom research and did not affect the self-caught MW rates strongly suggests that the past consistency of probe-caught MW rates across a range of different settings is not an artifact of the thought-probe method. Our study also indicates that the self-caught MW methodology is a reliable way to acquire MW data. The extension of measurement techniques to include students’ self-caught reports provides valuable information about how to successfully and naturalistically monitor MW in lecture settings, outside the laboratory.

Keywords

Mind wandering Self-report Lectures Attention 

Notes

Author note

The authors thank Avarna Fernandes, Faith Jabs, and Sonia Milani for help with the data collection and coding, and Janel Fergusson for the use of her classroom sessions. This research was supported by a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) grant to A.K., and by an NSERC Canadian Graduate Scholarship to T.L.V.-S.

References

  1. Antrobus, J. S. (1968). Information theory and stimulus-independent thought. British Journal of Psychology, 59, 423–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Carriere, J. S., Seli, P., & Smilek, D. (2013). Wandering in both mind and body: Individual differences in mind wandering and inattention predict fidgeting. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 19–31.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031438 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chisholm, J. D., Chapman, C. S., Amm, M., Bischof, W. F., Smilek, D., & Kingstone, A. (2014). A cognitive ethology study of first-and third-person perspectives. PLoS ONE, 9, e92696.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092696 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Esterman, M., Noonan, S. K., Rosenberg, M., & DeGutis, J. (2012). In the zone or zoning out? Tracking behavioral and neural fluctuations during sustained attention. Cerebral Cortex, 23, 2712–2723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Farley, J., Risko, E. F., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Everyday attention and lecture retention: The effects of time, fidgeting, and mind wandering. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 619.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00619 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Feng, S., D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. C. (2013). Mind wandering while reading easy and difficult texts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 586–592.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-012-0367-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2009). Harnessing the wandering mind: The role of perceptual load. Cognition, 111, 345–355.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2014). Distracted by your mind? Individual differences in distractibility predict mind wandering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 251–260.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034108 Google Scholar
  9. Foulsham, T., Farley, J., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Mind wandering in sentence reading: Decoupling the link between mind and eye. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 51–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franklin, M. S., Broadway, J. M., Mrazek, M. D., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). Window to the wandering mind: Pupillometry of spontaneous thought while reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 2289–2294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Galéra, C., Orriols, L., M’Bailara, K., Laborey, M., Contrand, B., Ribéreau-Gayon, R., . . . Maury, B. (2012). Mind wandering and driving: Responsibility case-control study. BMJ, 345, e8105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Giambra, L. M. (1993). Sustained attention in older adults: Performance and processes. In J. Cerella, J. M. Rybash, W. Hoyer, & M. L. Commons (Eds.), Adult information processing: Limits on loss (pp. 259–272). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. Giambra, L. M. (1995). A laboratory method for investigating influences on switching attention to task-unrelated imagery and thought. Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hollis, R. B., & Was, C. A. (2014). Mind wandering and online learning: How working memory, interest, and mind wandering impact learning from videos. In P. Bello, M. Guarini, M. McShane, & B. Scassellati (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 3084–3089). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
  15. Jackson, J. D., & Balota, D. A. (2012). Mind-wandering in younger and older adults: Converging evidence from the sustained attention to response task and reading for comprehension. Psychology and Aging, 27, 106–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kam, J. W. Y., Dao, E., Blinn, P., Krigolson, O. E., Boyd, L. A., & Handy, T. C. (2012). Mind wandering and motor control: Off-task thinking disrupts the online adjustment of behavior. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 329.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2012.00329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kam, J. W. Y., Dao, E., Stanciulescu, M., Tildesley, H., & Handy, T. C. (2013). Mind wandering and the adaptive control of attentional resources. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 952–960.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00375 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kane, M. J., Brown, L. H., McVay, J. C., Silvia, P. J., Myin-Germeys, I., & Kwapil, T. R. (2007). For whom the mind wanders, and when: an experience-sampling study of working memory and executive control in daily life. Psychologicial Science, 18, 614–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., & Eastwood, J. D. (2008). Cognitive ethology: A new approach for studying human cognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 317–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lindquist, S. I., & McLean, J. P. (2011). Daydreaming and its correlates in an educational environment. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 158–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McVay J. C., & Kane M. J. (2009). Conducting the train of thought: Working memory capacity, goal neglect, and mind wandering in an executive-control task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 196–204.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014104 Google Scholar
  22. McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2012). Drifting from slow to “D’oh!”: Working memory capacity and mind wandering predict extreme reaction times and executive control errors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 525–549.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025896 Google Scholar
  23. Mooneyham, B. W., & Schooler, J. W. (2013). The costs and benefits of mind-wandering: A review. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 11–18.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031569 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2015). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs (R package version 0.9.12-2). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BayesFactor
  25. Phillips, N. E., Mills, C., D’Mello, S., & Risko, E. F. (2016). On the influence of re-reading on mind wandering. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 2338–2357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. R Core Team. (2015). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org Google Scholar
  27. Reichle, E. D., Reineberg, A. E., & Schooler, J. W. (2010). Eye movements during mindless reading. Psychological Science, 21, 1300–1310.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610378686 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Risko, E. F., Anderson, N., Sarwal, A., Engelhardt, M., & Kingstone, A. (2012). Everyday attention: Variation in mind wandering and memory in a lecture. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 26, 234–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Risko, E. F., Buchanan, D., Medimorec, S., & Kingstone, A. (2013). Everyday attention: Mind wandering and computer use during lectures. Computers and Education, 68, 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Risko, E. F., Richardson, D. C., & Kingstone, A. (2016). Breaking the fourth wall of cognitive science: Real-world social attention and the dual function of gaze. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25, 70–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sayette, M. A, Reichle, E. D., & Schooler, J. W. (2009). Lost in the sauce: The effects of alcohol on mind wandering. Psychological Science, 20, 747–752.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02351.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schad, D. J., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2012). Your mind wanders weakly, your mind wanders deeply: Objective measures reveal mindless reading at different levels. Cognition, 125, 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schooler, J. W., Reichle, E. D., & Halpern, D. V. (2004). Zoning out while reading: Evidence for dissociations between experience and metaconsciousness. In D. T. Levin (Ed.), Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children (pp. 203–226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Seli, P., Carriere, J. S., Thomson, D. R., Cheyne, J. A., Martens, K. A. E., & Smilek, D. (2014). Restless mind, restless body. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 660–668.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035260 Google Scholar
  35. Seli, P., Carriere, J. S., Levene, M., & Smilek, D. (2013). How few and far between? Examining the effects of probe rate on self-reported mind wandering. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 430.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00430 Google Scholar
  36. Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2006). The restless mind. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 946–958.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.6.946 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smilek, D., Carriere, J. S., & Cheyne, J. A. (2010). Out of mind, out of sight: Eye blinking as indicator and embodiment of mind wandering. Psychological Science, 21, 786–789.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610368063 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Storm, B. C., & Bui, D. C. (2016). Individual differences in mind wandering while reading predict lower rates of analogical transfer. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 427–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Thomson, D. R., Seli, P., Besner, D., & Smilek, D. (2014). On the link between mind wandering and task performance over time. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 14–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Unsworth, N., & McMillan, B. D. (2013). Mind wandering and reading comprehension: Examining the roles of working memory capacity, interest, motivation, and topic experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39, 832–842.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029669 Google Scholar
  41. Unsworth, N., McMillan, B. D., Brewer, G. A., & Spillers, G. J. (2012). Everyday attention failures: An individual differences investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 1765–1772.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028075 Google Scholar
  42. Uzzaman, S., & Joordens, S. (2011). The eyes know what you are thinking: Eye movements as an objective measure of mind wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1882–1886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Varao Sousa, T. L., Carriere, J. S. A., & Smilek, D. (2013). The way we encounter reading material influences how frequently we mind wander. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 892.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00892 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Varao-Sousa, T. L., & Kingstone, A. (2015). Memory for lectures: How lecture format impacts the learning experience. PLoS ONE, 10, e0141587.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141587 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wammes, J. D., Boucher, P. O., Seli, P., Cheyne, J. A., & Smilek, D. (2016a). Mind wandering during lectures I: Changes in rates across an entire semester. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 2, 13–32.  https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wammes, J. D., Seli, P., Cheyne, J. A., Boucher, P. O., & Smilek, D. (2016b). Mind wandering during lectures II: Relation to academic performance. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 2, 33–48.  https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wammes, J., & Smilek, D. (2017). Examining the influence of lecture format on degree of mind wandering. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6, 174–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Young, M. S., Robinson, S., & Alberts, P. (2009). Students pay attention! Combating the vigilance decrement to improve learning during lectures. Active Learning in Higher Education, 10, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations