Sensory experience ratings (SERs) for 1,659 French words: Relationships with other psycholinguistic variables and visual word recognition
We collected sensory experience ratings (SERs) for 1,659 French words in adults. Sensory experience for words is a recently introduced variable that corresponds to the degree to which words elicit sensory and perceptual experiences (Juhasz & Yap Behavior Research Methods, 45, 160–168, 2013; Juhasz, Yap, Dicke, Taylor, & Gullick Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 1683–1691, 2011). The relationships of the sensory experience norms with other psycholinguistic variables (e.g., imageability and age of acquisition) were analyzed. We also investigated the degree to which SER predicted performance in visual word recognition tasks (lexical decision, word naming, and progressive demasking). The analyses indicated that SER reliably predicted response times in lexical decision, but not in word naming or progressive demasking. The findings are discussed in relation to the status of SER, the role of semantic code activation in visual word recognition, and the embodied view of cognition.
KeywordsSensory experience ratings (SERs) Semantic richness Visual word recognition Grounded cognition
The authors thank Mélanie Provost for her help in the collection of the data. The authors also thank Melvin Yap, Barbara Juhasz, Jon Andoni Duñabeitia, and an anonymous reviewer for constructive reviews on a previous version of the manuscript. This work was supported by a grant from Institut Universitaire de France to the first author, and by a grant from the Conseil Régional de Bourgogne to the last author.
- Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In M. de Vega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols and embodiment: Debates on meaning and cognition (pp. 245–283). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bonin, P., Guillemard-Tsaparina, D., & Méot, A. (2013). Determinants of naming latencies, object comprehension times, and new norms for the Russian standardized set of the colorized version of the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 731–745. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0279-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. T., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention and performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Ferrand, L., Bonin, P., Méot, A., Augustinova, M., New, B., Pallier, C., & Brysbaert, M. (2008). Age-of-acquisition and subjective frequency estimates for all generally known monosyllabic French words and their relation with other psycholinguistic variables. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 1049–1054. doi: 10.3758/BRM.40.4.1049 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ferrand, L., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., New, B., Bonin, P., Méot, A., … Pallier, C. (2011). Comparing word processing times in naming, lexical decision, and progressive demasking: Evidence from Chronolex. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 306. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00306
- Ferrand, L., New, B., Brysbaert, M., Keuleers, E., Bonin, P., Méot, A., … Pallier, C. (2010). The French Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 38,840 French words and 38,840 pseudowords. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 488–496. doi: 10.3758/BRM.42.2.488