Advertisement

The role of phonology during visual word learning in adults: An integrative review

  • Gabriela MeadeEmail author
Theoretical Review
  • 130 Downloads

Abstract

Throughout their lifetime, adults learn new words in their native lannguage, and potentially also in a second language. However, they do so with variable levels of success. In the auditory word learning literature, some of this variability has been attributed to phonological skills, including decoding and phonological short-term memory. Here I examine how the relationship between phonological skills and word learning applies to the visual modality. I define the availability of phonology in terms of (1) the extent to which it is biased by the learning environment, (2) the characteristics of the words to be learned, and (3) individual differences in phonological skills. Across these three areas of research, visual word learning improves when phonology is made more available to adult learners, suggesting that phonology can facilitate learning across modalities. However, the facilitation is largely specific to alphabetic languages, which have predictable sublexical correspondences between orthography and phonology. Therefore, I propose that phonology bootstraps visual word learning by providing a secondary code that constrains and refines developing orthographic representations.

Keywords

Adult word learning Orthographic processing Phonological recoding Lexical quality 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This material was supported by National Science Foundation Grant No. BCS-1823955 and Graduate Research Fellowship No. 2016196208 and by a Women in Cognitive Science Travel Award to Initiate International Research Collaborations. I thank Phil Holcomb, Jonathan Grainger, and Mathieu Declerck for insightful discussions and debates on these topics, and the members of my dissertation committee for comments on a previous version of the review.

References

  1. Andrews, S., & Hersch, J. (2010). Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 139, 299–318.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018366 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andrews, S., & Lo, S. (2012). Not all skilled readers have cracked the code: Individual differences in masked form priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 152–163.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024953 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Angwin, A. J., Phua, B., & Copland, D. A. (2014). Using semantics to enhance new word learning: An ERP investigation. Neuropsychologia, 59, 169–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.05.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkins, P. W. B., & Baddeley, A. D. (1998). Working memory and distributed vocabulary learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19, 537–552.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400010353 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baddeley, A. D., Gathercole, S. E., & Papagno, C. (1998). The phonological loop as a language learning device. Psychological Review, 105, 158–173.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.1.158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barcroft, J., & Sunderman, G. (2008). Learning new words for objects and nonobjects: Theoretical and methodological implications. Mental Lexicon, 3, 325–348.  https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.3.3.05bar CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bartolotti, J., & Marian, V. (2017). Orthographic knowledge and lexical form influence vocabulary learning. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 427–456.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716416000242 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Bartolotti, J., & Marian, V. (2019). Learning and processing of orthography-to-phonology mappings in a third language. International Journal of Multilingualism.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1423073 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Blau, V., van Atteveldt, N., Ekkebus, M., Goebel, R., & Blomert, L. (2009). Reduced neural integration for letters and speech sounds links phonological and reading deficits in adult dyslexia. Current Biology, 19, 503–508.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.065 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brennan, C., & Booth, J. R. (2015). Large grain instruction and phonological awareness skill influence rime sensitivity, processing speed, and early decoding skill in adult L2 learners. Reading and Writing, 28, 917–938.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9555-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Brusnighan, S. M., Morris, R. K., Folk, J. R., & Lowell, R. (2014). The role of phonology in incidental vocabulary acquisition during silent reading. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 26, 871–892.  https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2014.965713 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burt, J. S., & Blackwell, P. (2008). Sound–spelling consistency in adult’ orthographic learning. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 77–96.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00362.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Burt, J. S., & Butterworth, P. (1996). Spelling in adults: Orthographic transparency, learning new letter strings and reading accuracy. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 8, 3–43.  https://doi.org/10.1080/095414496383194 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cao, F., Sussman, B. L., Rios, V., Yan, X., Wang, Z., Spray, G. J., & Mack, R. M. (2017). Different mechanisms in learning different second languages: Evidence from English speakers learning Chinese and Spanish. NeuroImage, 148, 284–295.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.01.042 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chalmers, K. A., & Burt, J. S. (2008). Phonological and semantic information in adults’ orthographic learning. Acta Psychologica, 128, 162–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2007.12.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. de Jong, P. F., Seveke, M.-J., & van Veen, M. (2000). Phonological sensitivity and the acquisition of new words in children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 76, 275–301.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1999.2549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Di Betta, A. M., & Romani, C. (2006). Lexical learning with dysgraphia in a group of adults with developmental dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23, 376–400.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000545 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ehri, L. C. (1992). Reconceptualizing the development of sight word reading and its relationship to recoding. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 107–143). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  20. Fariña, N., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2017). Phonological and orthographic coding in deaf skilled readers. Cognition, 168, 27–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23, 1–35.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701578013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3, 128—156.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00121.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Grainger, J., Kiyonaga, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2006). The time course of orthographic and phonological code activation. Psychological Science, 17, 1021–1026.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01821.x CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 54:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Guan, C. Q., Liu, Y., Chan, D. H. L., Ye, F., & Perfetti, C. A. (2011). Writing strengthens orthography and alphabetic-coding strengthens phonology in learning to read Chinese. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 509–522.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guan, C. Q., Perfetti, C. A., & Meng, W. (2015). Writing quality predicts Chinese learning. Reading and Writing, 28, 763–795.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9549-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gupta, P. (2003). Examining the relationship between word learning, nonword repetition, and immediate serial recall in adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56, 1213–1236.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980343000071 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamada, M., & Koda, K. (2008). Influence of first language orthographic experience on second language decoding and word learning. Language Learning, 58, 1–31.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00433.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hanson, V. L., & McGarr, N. S. (1989). Rhyme generation by deaf adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 32, 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Howland, K. A., & Liederman, J. (2013). Beyond decoding: Adults with dyslexia have trouble forming unified lexical representations across pseudoword learning episodes. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56, 1009–1022.  https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0252) CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Hummel, K. M., & French, L. M. (2016). Phonological memory and aptitude components: Contributions to second language proficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 249–255.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaushanskaya, M., & Yoo, J. (2011). Rehearsal effects in adult word learning. Language and Cognitive Processes, 26, 121–148.  https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2010.486579 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kwok, R. K. W., & Ellis, A. W. (2014). Visual word learning in adults with dyslexia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 264:1–12.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00264 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lagarrigue, A., Longcamp, M., Anton, J.-L., Nazarian, B., Prévot, L., Velay, J.-L., . . . Frenck-Mestre, C. (2017). Activation of writing-specific brain regions when reading Chinese as a second language: Effects of training modality and transfer to novel characters. Neuropsychologia, 97, 83–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MacSweeney, M., Goswami, U., & Neville, H. J. (2013). The neurobiology of rhyme judgment by deaf and hearing adults: An ERP study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 1037–1048.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00373 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Majerus, S., Poncelet, M., Elsen, B., & Van Der Linden, M. (2006). Exploring the relationship between new word learning and short-term memory for serial order recall, item recall, and item recognition. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 18, 848–873.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440500446476 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Martin, K. I., & Ellis, N. C. (2012). The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 379–413.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263112000125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McKague, M., Davis, C., Pratt, C., & Johnston, M. B. (2008). The role of feedback from phonology to orthography in orthographic learning: An extension of item-based accounts. Journal of Research in Reading, 31, 55–76.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2007.00361.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McKay, A., Davis, C., Savage, G., & Castles, A. (2008). Semantic involvement in reading aloud: Evidence from a nonword training study. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 1495–1517.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013357 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Meade, G., Grainger, J., Midgley, K. J., Emmorey, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2018). From sublexical facilitation to lexical competition: ERP effects of masked neighbor priming. Brain Research, 1685, 29–41.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2018.01.029 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Meade, G., Midgley, K. J., Dijkstra, T., & Holcomb, P. J. (2018). Cross-language neighborhood effects in learners indicative of an integrated lexicon. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30, 70–85.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01184 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Meade, G., Grainger, J., Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., & Emmorey, K. (2019). ERP effects of masked orthographic neighbor priming in deaf readers. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(8), 1016–1026.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1614201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meschyan, G., & Hernandez, A. E. (2002). Age of acquisition and word frequency: Determinants of object-naming speed and accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 30, 262–269.  https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mori, Y. (1998). Effects of first language and phonological accessibility on Kanji recognition. Modern Language Journal, 82, 69–82.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1998.tb02595.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. O’Brien, I., Segalowitz, N. S., Freed, B. F., & Collentine, J. (2007). Phonological memory predicts second language oral fluency gains in adults. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 557–581.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310707043X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Ocal, T., & Ehri, L. C. (2017). Spelling ability in college students predicted by decoding, print exposure, and vocabulary. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 47, 58–74.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10790195.2016.1219242 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Papagno, C., Valentine, T., & Baddeley, A. D. (1991). Phonological short-term memory and foreign-language vocabulary learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 331–347.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90040-Q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Perfetti, C. A. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  49. Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Reading ability: Lexical quality to comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 357–383.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530730 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Perry, C., Ziegler, J., & Zorzi, M. (2007). Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP+ model of reading aloud. Psychological Review, 114, 273–315.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.2.273 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Pitchford, N., Ledgeway, T., & Masterson, J. (2009). Reduced orthographic learning in dyslexic adult readers: Evidence from patterns of letter search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 99–113.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701823023 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., Shaoul, C., Milin, P., & Baayen, H. (2014). The myth of cognitive decline: Non-linear dynamics of lifelong learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6, 5–42.  https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12078 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2006). Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? Cognitive Psychology, 53, 97–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ricketts, J., Nation, K., & Bishop, D. V. M. (2007). Vocabulary is important for some, but not all reading skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11, 235–257.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701344306 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Samara, A., & Caravolas, M. (2017). Artificial grammar learning in dyslexic and non-dyslexic adults: Implications for orthographic learning. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21, 76–97.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2016.1262865 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sandak, R., Mencl, W. E., Frost, S. J., Rueckl, J. G., Katz, L., Moore, D. L., . . . Pugh, K. R. (2004). The neurobiology of adaptive learning in reading: A contrast of different training conditions. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4, 67–88.  https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.4.1.67 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Service, E., & Kohonen, V. (1995). Is the relation between phonological memory and form learning accounted for by vocabulary acquisition? Applied Psycholinguistics, 16, 155–172.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400007062 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition. Cognition, 55, 151–218.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of the self-teachinng hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95–129.  https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1998.2481 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Share, D. L. (2008). Orthographic learning, phonological recoding, and self-teaching. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 36, 31–82.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(08)00002-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Snowling, M. J., Nation, K., Moxham, P., Gallagher, A., & Frith, U. (1997). Phonological processing skills of dyslexia students in higher education: A preliminary report. Journal of Research in Reading, 20, 31–41.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.00018 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sparks, R. L., Ganschow, L., Patton, J., Artzer, M., Siebenhar, D., & Plageman, M. (1997). Prediction of foreign language proficiency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 549–561.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.549 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sparks, R. L., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., Humbach, N., & Javorsky, J. (2006). Native language predictors of foreign language proficiency and foreign language aptitude. Annals of Dyslexia, 56, 129–160.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-006-0006-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sprenger-Charolles, L., Siegel, L. S., Béchennec, D., & Serniclaes, W. (2003). Development of phonological and orthographic processing in reading aloud, in silent reading, and in spelling: A four-year longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 84, 194–217.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0965(03)00024-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Taylor, J. S. H., Davis, M. H., & Rastle, K. (2017). Comparing and validating methods of reading instruction using behavioural and neural findings in an artificial orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 826–858.  https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000301 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Taylor, J. S. H., Plunkett, K., & Nation, K. (2011). The influence of consistency, frequency, and semantics on learning to read: An artificial orthography paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 60–76.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020126 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Torgesen, J. K., Morgan, S. T., & Davis, C. (1992). Effects of two types of phonological awareness training on word learning in kindergarten children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 364–370.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.364 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Bick, S. (2003). Influence of consonantal context on the pronunciation of vowels: A comparison of human readers and computational models. Cognition, 88, 49–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(03)00003-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Treutlein, A., Schöler, H., & Landerl, K. (2017). Recoding strategies of German learners of English as a foreign language. Reading and Writing, 30, 1215–1230.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9719-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Verhaeghen, P. (2003). Aging and vocabulary score: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 332–339.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.332 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Comprehensive test of phonological processing (CTOPP). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  72. Wang, M., Koda, K., & Perfetti, C. A. (2003). Alphabetic and non-alphabetic L1 effects in English word identification: A comparison of Korean and Chinese English L2 learners. Cognition, 87, 129–149.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0010-0277(02)00232-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Weekes, B. S. (2018). Learning written word vocabulary in a second language: Theoretical and practical implications. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21, 585–597.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Yum, Y. N. (2013). An ERP study on adult second language word learning (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Tufts University, Medford, MA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA
  2. 2.University of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations