Advertisement

If it looks, sounds, or feels like subitizing, is it subitizing? A modulated definition of subitizing

  • Naama Katzin
  • Zahira Ziva Cohen
  • Avishai Henik
Theoretical Review
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Research in cognitive psychology has focused mainly on the visual modality as the input interface for mental processes. We suggest that integrating studies from different modalities can aid in resolving theoretical controversies. We demonstrate this in the case of subitizing. Subitizing, the quick and accurate enumeration of small quantities, has been studied since the 19th century. Nevertheless, to date, the underlying mechanism is still debated. Two mechanisms have been suggested: a domain-general mechanism—attention, and a domain-specific mechanism—pattern recognition. Here, we review pivotal studies in the visual, tactile, and auditory modalities. The accumulative findings shed light on the theoretical debate. Accordingly, we suggest that subitizing is a subprocess of counting that occurs in the presence of facilitating factors, such as attentional resources and familiar patterns.

Keywords

Subitizing Pattern recognition FINST theory Multimodal 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013)/ERC Grant Agreement No. 295664 awarded to Avishai Henik, and by the Israel Science Foundation (Grant 1799/12) in the framework of their Centers of Excellence. Special thanks are given to Desiree Meloul for her professional and generous help.

References

  1. Anobile, G., Turi, M., Cicchini, G. M., & Burr, D. C. (2012). The effects of cross-sensory attentional demand on subitizing and on mapping number onto space. Vision Research, 74, 102–109. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2012.06.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashkenazi, S., Mark-Zigdon, N., & Henik, A. (2013). Do subitizing deficits in developmental dyscalculia involve pattern recognition weakness? Developmental Science, 16(1), 35–46. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2012.01190.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, J. (2002). The developing visual brain. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://philpapers.org/rec/ATKTDV CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bagattini, C., Mazza, V., Panizza, L., Ferrari, C., Bonomini, C., & Brignani, D. (2017). Neural dynamics of multiple object processing in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: Future early diagnostic biomarkers? Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 59(2), 643–654. doi: https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-161274 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Balakrishnanl, J. D., & Ashby, F. G. (1992). Subitizing: Magical numbers or mere superstition? Psychological Research, 54(2), 80–90. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00937136 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 617–645. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Basak, C., & Verhaeghen, P. (2003). Subitizing speed, subitizing range, counting speed, the Stroop effect, and aging: Capacity differences and speed equivalence. Psychology and Aging, 18(2), 240–249. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.240 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Burr, D. C., Turi, M., & Anobile, G. (2010). Subitizing but not estimation of numerosity requires attentional resources. Journal of Vision, 10(6), 20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1167/10.6.20 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Caldwell, D., Tsagarakis, N., & Wardle, A. (1997). Mechano thermo and proprioceptor feedback for integrated haptic feedback. In Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation (pp. 2491–2496). doi:10.1109/ROBOT.1997.619335Google Scholar
  10. Camos, V., & Tillmann, B. (2008). Discontinuity in the enumeration of sequentially presented auditory and visual stimuli. Cognition, 107(3), 1135–1143. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chouvardas, V., Miliou, A., & Hatalis, M. K. (2005). Tactile displays: A short overview and recent developments. In ICTA ‘05: Proceedings of Fifth International Conference on Technology and Automation (pp. 246–251).Google Scholar
  12. Chouvardas, V. G., Miliou, A. N., & Hatalis, M. K. (2008). Tactile displays: Overview and recent advances. Displays, 29(3), 185–194. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.displa.2007.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, Z. Z., Aisenberg, D., & Henik, A. (2016). The effects of training on tactile enumeration. Psychological Research, 1–20. Advance online publication. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-016-0835-5
  14. Cohen, Z., Arend, I., Yuen, K., Naparstek, S., Gliksman, Y., Veksler, R., & Henik, A. (2018). Tactile enumeration: A case study of acalculia. Brain and Cognition, 127(7), 60–71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2018.10.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cohen, Z. Z., & Henik, A. (2016). Effects of numerosity range on tactile and visual enumeration. Perception, 45(1–2), 83–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006615614662 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen, Z. Z., Naparstek, S., & Henik, A. (2014). Tactile enumeration of small quantities using one hand. Acta Psychologica, 150, 26–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.03.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Cutini, S., Scatturin, P., Basso Moro, S., & Zorzi, M. (2014). Are the neural correlates of subitizing and estimation dissociable? An fNIRS investigation. NeuroImage, 85, 391–399. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.08.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Davis, H., & Pérusse, R. (1988). Numerical competence in animals: Definitional issues, current evidence, and a new research agenda, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(4), 561–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dehaene, S., & Cohen, L. (1994). Dissociable mechanisms of subitizing and counting: Neuropsychological evidence from simultanagnosic patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20(5), 958–975. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.20.5.958 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Di Luca, S., & Pesenti, M. (2011). Finger numeral representations: More than just another symbolic code. Frontiers in Psychology. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00272
  21. Egeth, H. E., Leonard, C. J., & Palomares, M. (2008). The role of attention in subitizing: Is the magical number 1? Visual Cognition, 16(4), 463–473. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280801937939 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fischer, M. H., & Brugger, P. (2011). When digits help digits: Spatial-numerical associations point to finger counting as prime example of embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(October), 41–47. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gagnon, L., Mottron, L., Bherer, L., & Joanette, Y. (2004). Quantification judgement in high functioning autism: Superior or different? Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(6), 679–689. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-004-5288-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2008). The cognitive and neural correlates of “tactile consciousness”: A multisensory perspective. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(1), 370–407. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.01.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gallace, A., & Spence, C. (2014). In touch with the future: The sense of touch from cognitive neuroscience to virtual reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12088 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gallace, A., Tan, H., & Spence, C. (2008). Can tactile stimuli be subitised? An unresolved controversy within the literature on numerosity judgments. Perception, 37(5), 782–800. doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/p5767 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gliksman, Y., Weinbach, N., & Henik, A. (2016). Alerting cues enhance the subitizing process. Acta Psychologica, 170, 139–145. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2016.06.013 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2003). Action video game modifies visual selective attention. Nature, 423(May), 534–537. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01647 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hamilton, W. (1859). Lectures on metaphysics and logic (Vol. 1). Washington, DC: Gould and Lincoln.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jevons, S. W. (1871). The power of numerical discrimination. Nature, 3, 281–282. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/003281a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaufman, E. L., Lord, M. W., Reese, T. W., & Volkmann, J. (1949). The discrimination of visual number. The American Journal of Psychology, 62(4), 498–525. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1418556 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Landerl, K., Bevan, A., & Butterworth, B. (2004). Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: A study of 8–9-year-old students. Cognition, 93(2), 99–125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Leibovich, T., Henik, A., & Salti, M. (2015). Numerosity processing is context driven even in the subitizing range: An fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 77, 137–147. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.08.016 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Leibovich-Raveh, T., Lewis, D. J., Al-Rubaiey Kadhim, S., & Ansari, D. (2018). A new method for calculating individual subitizing ranges. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 4(2), 429–447. doi: https://doi.org/10.5964/jnc.v4i2.74 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Maeno, T., Kobayashi, K., & YamaZaki, N. (1997). Relationship between structure of finger tissue and location of tactile receptors. Nippon Kikai Gakkai Ronbunshu, C Hen/Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers Part C, 63(607), 881–888.Google Scholar
  36. Mandler, G., & Shebo, B. J. (1982). Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111(1), 1–22. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.111.1.1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mazza, V. (2017). Simultanagnosia and object individuation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1–10. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/02643294.2017.1331212Google Scholar
  38. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81–97. doi:10.1037/h0043158Google Scholar
  39. Møller, A. R. (2003). Sensory systems: Anatomy and physiology: Current opinion in neurobiology (Vol. 10). Houston: Gulf Professional Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Nakamura, A., Yamada, T., Goto, A., Kato, T., Ito, K., Abe, Y., …, Kakigi, R. (1998). Somatosensory homunculus as drawn by MEG. NeuroImage, 7(4), 377–386. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1998.0332 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Narici, L., Modena, I., Opsomer, R. J., Pizzella, V., Romani, G. L., Torrioli, G., … Rossini, P. M. (1991). Neuromagnetic somatosensory homunculus: A non-invasive approach in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 121(1/2), 51–54. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(91)90647-C CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Olivers, C. N. L., & Watson, D. G. (2008). Subitizing requires attention. Visual Cognition, 16(4), 439–462. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280701825861 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Overvliet, K. E., & Plaisier, M. A. (2016). Perceptual grouping affects haptic enumeration over the fingers. Perception, 45(1/2), 71–82. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006615594958 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Pagano, S., Lombardi, L., & Mazza, V. (2014). Brain dynamics of attention and working memory engagement in subitizing. Brain Research, 1543, 244–252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2013.11.025 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Piazza, M., Fumarola, A., Chinello, A., & Melcher, D. (2011). Subitizing reflects visuo-spatial object individuation capacity. Cognition, 121(1), 147–153. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Piazza, M., Mechelli, A., Butterworth, B., & Price, C. J. (2002). Are subitizing and counting implemented as separate or functionally overlapping processes? NeuroImage, 15(2), 435–446. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0980 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Plaisier, M. A., & Smeets, J. B. J. (2011). Haptic subitizing across the fingers. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73(5), 1579–1585. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-011-0124-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Plaisier, M. A., Tiest, W. M. B., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2009). One, two, three, many—Subitizing in active touch. Acta Psychologica, 131(2), 163–170. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2009.04.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Plaisier, M. A., Tiest, W. M. B., & Kappers, A. M. L. (2010). Grabbing subitizing with both hands: Bimanual number processing. Experimental Brain Research, 202(2), 507–512. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-009-2146-1 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Poiese, P., Spalek, T. M., & Di Lollo, V. (2008). Attentional involvement in subitizing: Questioning the preattentive hypothesis. Visual Cognition, 16(4), 474–485. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280801969676 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Railo, H., Koivisto, M., Revonsuo, A., & Hannula, M. M. (2008). The role of attention in subitizing. Cognition, 107, 82–104. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.08.004Google Scholar
  52. Repp, B. H. (2007). Perceiving the numerosity of rapidly occurring auditory events in metrical and nonmetrical contexts. Perception & Psychophysics, 69(4), 529–543. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193910 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Riggs, K. J., Ferrand, L., Lancelin, D., Fryziel, L., Dumur, G., & Simpson, A. (2006). Subitizing in tactile perception. Psychological Science, 17(4), 271–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01696.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Rinaldi, L., Di Luca, S., Henik, A., & Girelli, L. (2016). A helping hand putting in order: Visuomotor routines organize numerical and non-numerical sequences in space. Cognition, 152, 40–52. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.03.003 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Saltzman, I. J., & Garner, W. R. (1948). Reaction time as a measure of span of attention. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 25(2), 227–241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1948.9917373 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sengupta, R., Bapiraju, S., & Melcher, D. (2016). Big and small numbers: Empirical support for a single, flexible mechanism for numerosity perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 79(1), 253–266. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-016-1221-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. ten Hoopen, G., & Vos, J. (1979). Effect on numerosity judgment of grouping of tones by auditory channels. Perception & Psychophysics, 26(5), 374–380. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204162 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Trick, L. M., & Pylyshyn, Z. W. (1994). Why are small and large numbers enumerated differently? A limited-capacity preattentive stage in vision. Psychological Review, 101(1), 80–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.80 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. von Glasersfeld, E. (1982). Subitizing: The role of figural patterns in the development of numerical concepts. Archives de Psychologie, 50, 191–218. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1983-12449-001 Google Scholar
  60. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/index/GT33335RG5156860.pdf
  61. Wolters, G., van Kempen, H., & Wijlhuizen, G.-J. (1987). Quantification of small numbers of dots: Subitizing or pattern recognition? The American Journal of Psychology, 100(2), 225–237. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1422405 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yang, T. T., Gallen, C. C., Schwartz, B. J., & Bloom, F. E. (1993). Noninvasive somatosensory homunculus mapping in humans by using a large-array biomagnetometer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 90(7), 3098–3102. doi: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.90.7.3098 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naama Katzin
    • 1
    • 2
  • Zahira Ziva Cohen
    • 1
  • Avishai Henik
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeer-ShevaIsrael
  2. 2.Zlotowski Center for NeuroscienceBen-Gurion University of the NegevBeer-ShevaIsrael

Personalised recommendations