A social Bouba/Kiki effect: A bias for people whose names match their faces

Brief Report

Abstract

The “bouba/kiki effect” is the robust tendency to associate rounded objects (vs. angular objects) with names that require rounding of the mouth to pronounce, and may reflect synesthesia-like mapping across perceptual modalities. Here we show for the first time a “social” bouba/kiki effect, such that experimental participants associate round names (“Bob,” “Lou”) with round-faced (vs. angular-faced) individuals. Moreover, consistent with a bias for expectancy-consistent information, we find that participants like targets with “matching” names, both when name-face fit is measured and when it is experimentally manipulated. Finally, we show that such bias could have important practical consequences: An analysis of voting data reveals that Senatorial candidates earn 10% more votes when their names fit their faces very well, versus very poorly. These and similar cross-modal congruencies suggest that social judgment involves not only amodal application of stored information (e.g., stereotypes) to new stimuli, but also integration of perceptual and bodily input.

Keywords

Social cognition Social perception Face perception Attitudes 

Supplementary material

13423_2017_1304_MOESM1_ESM.docx (87 kb)
ESM 1(DOCX 87 kb)

References

  1. Abelson, R. P., Kinder, D. R., Peters, M. D., & Fiske, S. T. (1982). Affective and semantic components in political person perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(4), 619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babynamewizard.com. (2015). The top 1000 baby names of 2013, United States of America 2013, from http://www.babynamewizard.com/the-top-1000-baby-names-of-2013-united-states-of-america
  3. Ballew, C. C., & Todorov, A. (2007). Predicting political elections from rapid and unreflective face judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104(46), 17948–17953.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Bremner, A. J., Caparos, S., Davidoff, J., de Fockert, J., Linnell, K. J., & Spence, C. (2013). "Bouba" and "Kiki" in Namibia? A remote culture make similar shape-sound matches, but different shape-taste matches to Westerners. Cognition, 126(2), 165–172.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chandrashekar, J., Yarmolinsky, D., von Buchholtz, L., Oka, Y., Sly, W., Ryba, N. J., et al. (2009). The taste of carbonation. Science, 326(5951), 443–445.Google Scholar
  6. Davis, R. (1961). The fitness of names to drawings - a cross-cultural-study in Tanganyika. British Journal of Psychology, 52(3), 259–268.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Deliza, R., MacFie, H., & Hedderley, D. (2003). Use of computer-generated images and conjoint analysis to investigate sensory expectations. Journal of Sensory Studies, 18(6), 465–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Enlow, D. H., & Hans, M. G. (1996). Essentials of facial growth: WB Saunders Company.Google Scholar
  9. Farkas, L. G. (1994). Anthropometry of the head and face: Raven Pr.Google Scholar
  10. Figlio, D. N. (2007). Boys named Sue: Disruptive children and their peers. Education, 2(4), 376–394.Google Scholar
  11. Friedman, G. (2015). Behind the narrow margins of victory in us presidential elections Retrieved 31 October 2012, 2012, from http://www.economywatch.com/economy-business-and-finance-news/behind-the-narrow-margins-of-victory-in-us-presidential-elections.31-10.html
  12. Killen, J. D., Hayward, C., Wilson, D. M., Haydel, K. F., Robinson, T. N., Taylor, C. B., et al. (1996). Predicting onset of drinking in a community sample of adolescents: The role of expectancy and temperament. Addictive Behaviors, 21(4), 473–480.Google Scholar
  13. Kohler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Liveright.Google Scholar
  14. Ladefoged, P. (1990). The revised international phonetic alphabet. Language, 66(3), 550–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lea, M. A., Thomas, R. D., Lamkin, N. A., & Bell, A. (2007). Who do you look like? Evidence of facial stereotypes for male names. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(5), 901–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Öhman, A. (1998). The Karolinska directed emotional faces (KDEF). CD ROM from Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Psychology section, Karolinska Institutet, 91–630.Google Scholar
  17. Maurer, D., Pathman, T., & Mondloch, C. J. (2006). The shape of boubas: sound-shape correspondences in toddlers and adults. Developmental Science, 9(3), 316–322.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Michie, S., Marteau, T. M., & Bobrow, M. (1997). Genetic counselling: The psychological impact of meeting patients' expectations. Journal of Medical Genetics, 34(3), 237–241.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Ngo, M. K., Misra, R., & Spence, C. (2011). Assessing the shapes and speech sounds that people associate with chocolate samples varying in cocoa content. Food Quality and Preference, 22(6), 567–572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Niedenthal, P. M., Barsalou, L. W., Winkielman, P., Krauth-Gruber, S., & Ric, F. (2005). Embodiment in attitudes, social perception, and emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 184–211.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Olivola, C. Y., & Todorov, A. (2010). Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34(2), 83–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ozturk, O., Krehm, M., & Vouloumanos, A. (2013). Sound symbolism in infancy: evidence for sound-shape cross-modal correspondences in 4-month-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 114(2), 173–186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pexman, P., & Sidhu, D. M. (2014). Beyond The Bouba/kiki Effect: The Bob/kirk Effect. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 68(4), 253–254.Google Scholar
  24. Ramachandran, V., & Hubbard, E. M. (2001). Synaesthesia - A window into perception, thought and language. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(12), 3–34.Google Scholar
  25. Rosar, U., Klein, M., & Beckers, T. (2008). The frog pond beauty contest: Physical attractiveness and electoral success of the constituency candidates at the North Rhine-Westphalia state election of 2005. European Journal of Political Research, 47(1), 64–79.Google Scholar
  26. Sapir, E. (1929). A study in phonetic symbolism. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 225–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sidhu, D. M., & Pexman, P. M. (2015). What’s in a name? sound symbolism and gender in first names. PloS One, 10(5), e0126809.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Sidhu, D. M., Pexman, P. M., & Saint-Aubin, J. (2016). From the Bob/Kirk effect to the Benoit/Éric effect: Testing the mechanism of name sound symbolism in two languages. Acta Psychologica, 169, 88–99.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. SuperLab. (2006). 4.0 [Computer software]. (2006). Phoenix: Cedrus Corporation.Google Scholar
  30. Todorov, A., Mandisodza, A. N., Goren, A., & Hall, C. C. (2005). Inferences of competence from faces predict election outcomes. Science, 308(5728), 1623–1626.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Williams, S., Weinman, J., Dale, J., & Newman, S. (1995). Patient expectations: What do primary care patients want from the GP and how far does meeting expectations affect patient satisfaction? Family Practice, 12(2), 193–201.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Yeomans, M. R., Chambers, L., Blumenthal, H., & Blake, A. (2008). The role of expectancy in sensory and hedonic evaluation: The case of smoked salmon ice-cream. Food Quality and Preference, 19(6), 565–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations