Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 1001–1006 | Cite as

Attending to items in working memory: evidence that refreshing and memory search are closely related

Brief Report

Abstract

Refreshing refers to the use of attention to reactivate items in working memory (WM). In the present study, we aimed to test the hypothesis that refreshing is closely related to memory search. The assumption is that refreshing and memory search both rely on a basic covert memory process that quickly retrieves the memory items into the focus of attention, thereby reactivating the information (Cowan, 1992; Vergauwe & Cowan, 2014). Consistent with the idea that people use their attention to prevent loss from WM, previous research has shown that increasing the proportion of time during which attention is occupied by concurrent processing, thereby preventing refreshing, results in poorer recall performance in complex span tasks (Barrouillet, Portrat, & Camos, Psychological Review, 118, 175–192, 2011). Here, we tested whether recall performance is differentially affected by prolonged attentional capture caused by memory search. If memory search and refreshing both rely on retrieval from WM, then prolonged attentional capture caused by memory search should not lead to forgetting, because memory items are assumed to be reactivated during memory search, in the same way that they would be if that period of time were used for refreshing. Consistent with this idea, prolonged attentional capture had a disruptive effect when it was caused by the need to retrieve knowledge from long-term memory, but not when it was caused by the need to search through the content of WM. The present results support the idea that refreshing operates through a process of retrieval of information into the focus of attention.

Keywords

Working memory Attention and memory Short-term memory Refreshing Memory search 

Notes

Author note

This research was conducted with support to E.V. from the Swiss National Science Foundation (Grant No. PA00P1_139604), and to N.C. from NICHD Grant No. R01-HD-21338. We thank Suzanne Redington and Jake Lazaroff for assistance.

References

  1. Barrouillet, P., Bernardin, S., Portrat, S., Vergauwe, E., & Camos, V. (2007). Time and cognitive load in working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 570–585. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.3.570 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barrouillet, P., Portrat, S., & Camos, V. (2011). On the law relating processing to storage in working memory. Psychological Review, 118, 175–192. doi: 10.1037/a0022324 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burrows, D., & Okada, R. (1975). Memory retrieval from long and short lists. Science, 188, 1031–1033.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Camos, V., Lagner, P., & Barrouillet, P. (2009). Two maintenance mechanisms of verbal information in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 61, 457–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786. doi: 10.3758/BF03196772 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cowan, N. (1992). Verbal memory span and the timing of spoken recall. Journal of Memory and Language, 31, 668–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cowan, N. (1995). Attention and memory: An integrated framework. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Cowan, N., Wood, N. L., Wood, P. K., Keller, T. A., Nugent, L. D., & Keller, C. V. (1998). Two separate verbal processing rates contributing to short-term memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127, 141–160. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.127.2.141 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hudjetz, A., & Oberauer, K. (2007). The effects of processing time and processing rate on forgetting in working memory: Testing four models of the complex span paradigm. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1675–1684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jarrold, C., Tam, H., Baddeley, A. D., & Harvey, C. E. (2011). How does processing affect storage in working memory tasks? Evidence for both domain-general and domain-specific effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 688–705. doi: 10.1037/a0022527 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Landauer, T. K. (1962). Rate of implicit speech. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 15, 646.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Loaiza, V. M., & McCabe, D. P. (2012). Temporal-contextual processing in working memory: Evidence from delayed cued recall and delayed free recall tests. Memory & Cognition, 40, 191–203. doi: 10.3758/s13421-011-0148-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McCabe, D. P. (2008). The role of covert retrieval on working memory spa tasks: Evidence from delayed recall tests. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 480–494. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.04.004 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Raye, C. L., Johnson, M. K., Mitchell, K. J., Greene, E. J., & Johnson, M. R. (2007). Refreshing: A minimal executive function. Cortex, 43, 135–145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Souza, A. S., Rerko, L., & Oberauer, K. (2014). Unloading and reloading working memory: Attending to one item frees capacity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1237–1256. doi: 10.1037/a0036331 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Sternberg, S. (1966). High speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652–654. doi: 10.1126/science.153.3736.652 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Vergauwe, E., Barrouillet, P., & Camos, V. (2009). Visual and spatial working memory are not that dissociated after all: A time-based resource sharing account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 1012–1028. doi: 10.1037/a0015859 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Vergauwe, E., Barrouillet, P., & Camos, V. (2010). Do mental processes share a domain-general resource? Psychological Science, 21, 384–390.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Vergauwe, E., Camos, V., & Barrouillet, P. (2014). The impact of storage on processing: How is information maintained in working memory? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1072–1095.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Vergauwe, E., & Cowan, N. (2014). A common short-term memory retrieval rate may describe many cognitive procedures. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 126. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00126 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Psychological SciencesUniversity of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations