Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 717–721 | Cite as

Visual illusions can facilitate sport skill learning

  • Guillaume Chauvel
  • Gabriele Wulf
  • François Maquestiaux
Brief Report

Abstract

Witt, Linkenauger, and Proffitt (Psychological Science, 23, 397–399, 2012) demonstrated that golf putting performance was enhanced when the hole was surrounded by small circles, making it look larger, relative to when it was surrounded by large circles, making it look smaller. In the present study, we examined whether practicing putting with small or large surrounding circles would have not only immediate effects on performance, but also longer-lasting effects on motor learning. Two groups of nongolfers practiced putting golf balls to a 10.4-cm circle (“hole”) from a distance of 2 m. Small or large circles were projected around the hole during the practice phase. Perception of hole size was affected by the size of the surrounding circles. Also, self-efficacy was higher in the group with the perceived larger hole. One day after practice, participants performed the putting task, but without visual illusions (i.e., a retention test). Putting accuracy in retention was greater for the group that had practiced with the perceived larger hole. These findings suggest that the apparently larger target led to the more effective learning outcome.

Keywords

Golf putting Visual perception Ebbinghaus illusion Learning Self-efficacy 

References

  1. Ávila, L. T. G., Chiviacowsky, S., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Positive social-comparative feedback enhances motor learning in children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 849–853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badami, R., VaezMousavi, M., Wulf, G., & Namazizadeh, M. (2011). Feedback after good versus poor trials affects intrinsic motivation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82, 360–364.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Badami, R., VaezMousavi, M., Wulf, G., & Namazizadeh, M. (2012). Feedback about more accurate versus less accurate trials: Differential effects on self-confidence and activation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 83, 196–203.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Chauvel, G., Maquestiaux, F., Hartley, A. A., Joubert, S., Didierjean, A., & Masters, R. (2012). Age effects shrink when motor learning is predominantly supported by nondeclarative, automatic memory processes: Evidence from golf putting. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chiviacowsky, S., & Wulf, G. (2007). Feedback after good trials enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78, 40–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Clark, S. E., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2007). The impact of self-as-a-model interventions on children’s self-regulation of learning and swimming performance. Journal of Sports Sciences, 25, 577–586.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Damisch, L., Stoberock, B., & Mussweiler, T. (2010). Keep your fingers crossed! How superstition improves performance. Psychological Science, 21, 1014–1020. doi:10.1177/0956797610372631 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Feltz, D. L., Chow, D. M., & Hepler, T. J. (2008). Path analysis of self-efficacy and diving performance revisited. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 30, 401–411.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee, C., Linkenauger, S. A., Bakdash, J. Z., Joy-Gaba, J. A., & Proffitt, D. R. (2011). Putting like a pro: The role of positive contagion in golf performance and perception. PLoS ONE, 6, e26016. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026016 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2010). Social-comparative feedback affects motor skill learning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 738–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Masters, R. S. W., Poolton, J. M., & Maxwell, J. P. (2008). Stable implicit motor processes despite aerobic locomotor fatigue. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 335–338. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.03.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Moritz, S. E., Feltz, D. L., Fahrbach, K., & Mack, D. (2000). The relation of self-efficacy measures to sport performance: A meta-analytic review. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 280–294.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Saemi, E., Porter, J. M., Ghotbi-Varzaneh, A., Zarghami, M., & Maleki, F. (2012). Knowledge of results after relatively good trials enhances self-efficacy and motor learning. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 13, 378–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Saemi, E., Wulf, G., Ghotbi-Varzaneh, A., & Zarghami, M. (2011). Feedback after good versus poor trials enhances motor learning in children. Brazilian Journal of Physical Education and Sport, 25, 671–679.Google Scholar
  15. Schmidt, R. A., & Lee, T. D. (2011). Motor control and learning (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  16. Stevens, D., Anderson, D. I., O’Dwyer, N. J., & Williams, A. M. (2012). Does self-efficacy mediate transfer effects in the learning of easy and difficult motor skills? Consciousness and Cognition, 21, 1122–1128. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2012.03.014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Trempe, M., Sabourin, M., & Proteau, L. (2012). Success modulates consolidation of a visuomotor adaptation task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38, 52–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Witt, J. K., Linkenauger, S. A., & Proffitt, D. R. (2012). Get me out of this slump! Visual illusions improve sports performance. Psychological Science, 23, 397–399. doi:10.1177/0956797611428810 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Wood, G., Vine, S. J., & Wilson, M. R. (2013). The impact of visual illusions on perception, action planning, and motor performance. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 75, 830–834. doi:10.3758/s13414-013-0489-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Normative feedback effects on learning a timing task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 81, 425–431.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Lewthwaite, R. (2012). Altering mindset can enhance motor learning in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 27, 14–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Guillaume Chauvel
    • 1
  • Gabriele Wulf
    • 2
  • François Maquestiaux
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculté de médecineUniversité Jean FourierLa Tronche CedexFrance
  2. 2.University of Nevada, Las VegasLas VegasUSA
  3. 3.Université de Franche-ComtéBesançonFrance

Personalised recommendations