Advertisement

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 22, Issue 3, pp 750–756 | Cite as

Value-driven attentional priority is context specific

  • Brian A. AndersonEmail author
Brief Report

Abstract

Attention is automatically drawn to stimulus features previously associated with reward, a phenomenon referred to as value-driven attentional capture. To date, value-driven attentional capture has been studied exclusively by manipulating stimulus–reward contingencies in an experimental setting. Although practical and intuitively appealing, this approach poses theoretical challenges to understanding the broader impact of reward on attention in everyday life. These challenges arise from the fact that associative learning between a given visual feature and reward is not limited to the context of an experiment, yet such extra-experimental learning is completely ignored in studies of value-driven attention. How is it, then, that experimentally established reward associations even influence attention, seemingly overshadowing any prior learning about particular features and rewards? And how do the effects of this experimental learning persist over long periods of time, in spite of all the intervening experiences outside of the lab that might interfere with the learning? One potential answer to these questions is that value-driven attention is context specific, such that different contexts evoke different value priors that the attention system uses to assign priority. In the present study, I directly tested this hypothesis. The results show that the same stimulus feature either does or does not capture attention, depending on whether it has been rewarded specifically in the context within which it appears. The findings provide insight into how multiple reward structures can efficiently guide attention with minimal interference.

Keywords

Selective attention Reward learning Contextual learning 

Notes

Author note

This research was supported by NIH Grant Nos. F31-DA033754 and R01-DA013165.

References

  1. Anderson, B. A. (2013). A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 1–16. doi: 10.1167/13.3.7
  2. Anderson, B. A., Faulkner, M. L., Rilee, J. J., Yantis, S., & Marvel, C. L. (2013). Attentional bias for non-drug reward is magnified in addiction. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 21, 499–506.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011a). Learned value magnifies salience-based attentional capture. PloS One, 6, e27926. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027926 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011b). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 10367–10371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2012). Generalization of value-based attentional priority. Visual Cognition, 20, 647–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2012). Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74, 1644–1653. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0348-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2013). Persistence of value-driven attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 6–9. doi: 10.1037/a0030860 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433–436. doi: 10.1163/156856897X00357 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2013). Context-dependent control over attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 836–848.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Della Libera, C., & Chelazzi, L. (2006). Visual selective attention and the effects of monetary reward. Psychological Science, 17, 222–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01689.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Della Libera, C., & Chelazzi, L. (2009). Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses. Psychological Science, 20, 778–784. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02360.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Failing, M. F., & Theeuwes, J. (2014). Exogenous visual orienting by reward. Journal of Vision, 14(5), 6–9. doi: 10.1167/14.5.6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Field, M., & Cox, W. M. (2008). Attentional bias in addictive behaviors: A review of its development, causes, and consequences. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 97, 1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.03.030 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1030–1044. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Hickey, C., Chelazzi, L., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 11096–11103. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1026-10.2010 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kiss, M., Driver, J., & Eimer, M. (2009). Reward priority of visual target singletons modulates event-related potential signatures of attentional selection. Psychological Science, 20, 245–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02281.x CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Krebs, R. M., Boehler, C. N., & Woldorff, M. G. (2010). The influence of reward associations on conflict processing in the Stroop task. Cognition, 117, 341–347.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee, J., & Shomstein, S. (2014). Reward-based transfer from bottom-up to top-down search tasks. Psychological Science, 25, 466–475.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Maunsell, J. H. R. (2004). Neuronal representations of cognitive state: Reward or attention? Trends in Cognitive Science, 8, 261–265. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Muhle-Karbe, P. S., & Krebs, R. M. (2012). On the influence of reward on action-effect binding. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 450.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Qi, S., Zeng, Q., Ding, C., & Li, H. (2013). Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search. Brain Research, 1532, 32–43.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Raymond, J. E., & O’Brien, J. L. (2009). Selective visual attention and motivation: The consequences of value learning in an attentional blink task. Psychological Science, 20, 981–988. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02391.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (1993). What is the role of dopamine in reward: hedonics, learning, or incentive salience? Brain Research Reviews, 18, 247–291.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rutherford, H. J. V., O’Brien, J. L., & Raymond, J. E. (2010). Value associations of irrelevant stimuli modify rapid visual orienting. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 536–542. doi: 10.3758/PBR.17.4.536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sali, A. W., Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2014). The role of reward prediction in the control of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1654–1664. doi: 10.1037/a0037267 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Serences, J. T. (2008). Value-based modulations in human visual cortex. Neuron, 60, 1169–1181.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Theeuwes, J. (1992). Perceptual selectivity for color and form. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 599–606. doi: 10.3758/BF03211656 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Theeuwes, J., & Belopolsky, A. V. (2012). Reward grabs the eye: Oculomotor capture by rewarding stimuli. Vision Research, 74, 80–85.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Psychological & Brain SciencesJohns Hopkins UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations