Advertisement

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 408–419 | Cite as

Situated conceptualization and semantic processing: effects of emotional experience and context availability in semantic categorization and naming tasks

  • Michael Moffat
  • Paul D. Siakaluk
  • David M. Sidhu
  • Penny M. Pexman
Brief Report

Abstract

It has been proposed that much of conceptual knowledge is acquired through situated conceptualization, such that both external (e.g., agents, objects, events) and internal (e.g., emotions, introspections) environments are considered important (Barsalou, 2003). To evaluate this proposal, we characterized two dimensions by which situated conceptualization may be measured and which should have different relevance for abstract and concrete concepts; namely, emotional experience (i.e., the ease with which words evoke emotional experience; Newcombe, Campbell, Siakaluk, & Pexman, 2012) and context availability (i.e., the ease with which words evoke contexts in which their referents may appear; Schwanenflugel & Shoben, 1983). We examined the effects of these two dimensions on abstract and concrete word processing in verbal semantic categorization (VSCT) and naming tasks. In the VSCT, emotional experience facilitated processing of abstract words but inhibited processing of concrete words, whereas context availability facilitated processing of both types of words. In the naming task in which abstract words and concrete words were not blocked by emotional experience, context availability facilitated responding to only the abstract words. In the naming task in which abstract words and concrete words were blocked by emotional experience, emotional experience facilitated responding to only the abstract words, whereas context availability facilitated responding to only the concrete words. These results were observed even with several lexical (e.g., frequency, age of acquisition) and semantic (e.g., concreteness, arousal, valence) variables included in the analyses. As such, the present research suggests that emotional experience and context availability tap into different aspects of situated conceptualization and make unique contributions to the representation and processing of abstract and concrete concepts.

Keywords

Grounded cognition Semantic memory Emotional experience Context availability 

Notes

Author Note

This research was supported by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada in the form of Discovery Grants to PDS and PMP and a Canada Graduate Scholarship to DMS.

References

  1. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459.Google Scholar
  2. Barsalou, L. W. (2003). Situated simulation in the human conceptual system. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 513–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1281–1289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borghi, A. M., Flumini, A., Cimatti, F., Marocco, D., & Scorolli, C. (2011). Manipulating objects and telling words: A study on concrete and abstract words acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 15. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00015 PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1999). Affective norms for English words (ANEW): Stimuli, instruction manual and affective ratings (Technical report C-1). Gainesville, FL: The Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.Google Scholar
  6. Friendly, M., Franklin, P. E., Hoffman, D., & Rubin, D. C. (1982). The Toronto Word Pool: Norms for imagery, concreteness, orthographic variables, and grammatical usage for 1,080 words. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 14, 375–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hoffman, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Rogers, T. T. (2013). Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 718–730.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30 thousand English words. Behavior Research Methods. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4 PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Newcombe, P. I., Campbell, C., Siakaluk, P. D., & Pexman, P. M. (2012). Effects of emotional and sensorimotor knowledge in semantic processing of concrete and abstract nouns. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 275. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2012.00275 CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Paivio, A., Yuille, J. C., & Madigan, S. A. (1968). Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 76, 1–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Pecher, D., Boot, I., & van Dantzig, S. (2011). Abstract concepts: Sensory-motor grounding, metaphors, and beyond. In B. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 54) (pp. 217–248). Burlington: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  12. Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9, 82–102.Google Scholar
  13. Shaoul, C., & Westbury, C. (2010). Neighborhood Density Measures for 57,153 English words. Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta (downloaded from http://www.psych.ualberta.ca/~westburylab/downloads/westburylab.arcs.ncounts.html)
  14. Siakaluk, P. D., Knol, N., & Pexman, P. M. (2014). Effects of emotional experience for abstract words in the Stroop task. Cognitive Science. doi:  10.1111/cogs.12137
  15. Vigliocco, G., Meteyard, L., Andrews, M., & Kousta, S. (2009). Toward a theory of semantic representation. Language and Cognition, 1, 219–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Wiemer-Hastings, K., & Xu, X. (2005). Content differences for abstract and concrete concepts. Cognitive Science, 29, 719–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Barrett, L. F., Simmons, W. K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2011). Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1105–1127.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zdrazilova, L., & Pexman, P. M. (2013). Grasping the invisible: semantic processing of abstract words. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 1312–1318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Moffat
    • 1
  • Paul D. Siakaluk
    • 1
  • David M. Sidhu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Penny M. Pexman
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Northern British ColumbiaPrince GeorgeCanada
  2. 2.University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations