Advertisement

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 22, Issue 1, pp 147–155 | Cite as

More than use it or lose it: The number-of-speakers effect on heritage language proficiency

  • Tamar H. GollanEmail author
  • Jennie Starr
  • Victor S. Ferreira
Brief Report

Abstract

Acquiring a heritage language (HL), a minority language spoken primarily at home, is often a major step toward achieving bilingualism. Two studies examined factors that promote HL proficiency. Chinese–English and Spanish–English undergraduates and Hebrew–English children named pictures in both their languages, and they or their parents completed language history questionnaires. HL picture-naming ability correlated positively with the number of different HL speakers participants spoke to as children, independently of each language’s frequency of use, and without negatively affecting English picture-naming ability. HL performance increased also when primary caregivers had lower English proficiency, with later English age of acquisition, and (in children) with increased age. These results suggest a prescription for increasing bilingual proficiency is regular interaction with multiple HL speakers. Responsible cognitive mechanisms could include greater variety of words used by different speakers, representational robustness from exposure to variations in form, or multiple retrieval cues, perhaps analogous to contextual diversity effects.

Keywords

Picture naming Bilingual Heritage language Contextual diversity Social network 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by NIDCD (011492), NICHD (050287; 051030). The Tarbuton is supported by JFSDC, the LF, and the IAC.

Declaration of Conflicting Interests

The authors declared that they had no conflicts of interest with respect to their authorship or the publication of this article.

References

  1. Adelman, J. S., Brown, G. D. A., & Quesada, J. F. (2006). Contextual diversity, not word frequency, determines word-naming and lexical decision times. Psychological Science, 17, 814–823.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker, C. (2006). Foundations of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism (4th ed.). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  3. dore, L. M., Peña, E. D., Summers, C. L., Boerger, K. M., Resendiz, M. D., Greene, K.…Gillam, R. B. (2012). The measure matters: Language dominance profiles across measures in Spanish–English bilingual children. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 616–629.Google Scholar
  4. Bradlow, A. R., & Bent, T. (2008). Perceptual adaptation to non-native speech. Cognition, 106, 707–729. PMCID: PMC2213510.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cenoz, J., & Gorter, D. (2009). Multilingualism and Minority Languages: Achievements and challenges in education, AILA Review, Volume 21.Google Scholar
  6. De Houwer, A. (2007). Parental language input patterns and children's bilingual use. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Houwer, A. (2009). Bilingual first language acquisition. Tonawanda: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
  8. Edwards, J. (1997). Language minorities and language maintenance. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 17(Multilingualism), 3-10.Google Scholar
  9. Gathercole, V.C.M., & Thomas, E.M. (2006). Factors contributing to language transmission in bilingual families: The core study--adult interviews. Language Transmission in Bilingual Families in Wales. Welsh Language Board.Google Scholar
  10. Gathercole, V. C. M., & Thomas, E. M. (2009). Bilingual first-language development: Dominant language takeover, threatened minority language take-up. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 213–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gibbons, J., & Ramirez, E. G. (2004). Maintaining a Minority Language: A Case Study of Hispanic Teenagers. Tonawanda: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
  12. Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C. M., & Sandoval, T. C. (2008). More use almost always means smaller a frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58, 787–814.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gollan, T. H., Slattery, T. J., Goldenberg, D., van Assche, E., Duyck, W., & Rayner, K. (2011). Frequency drives lexical access in reading but not in speaking: The frequency-lag hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140, 186–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gollan, T. H., Weissberger, G., Runnqvist, E., Montoya, R. I., & Cera, C. M. (2012). Self-ratings of spoken language dominance: A multi-lingual naming test (MINT) and preliminary norms for young and aging Spanish-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 594–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hakuta, K., & D’Andrea, D. (1992). Some properties of bilingual maintenance and loss in Mexican background high-school students. Applied Linguistics, 13, 72–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hoff, E., & Place, S. (2012). Bilingual language learners. In S. Odom, E. Pungello, & N. Gardner-Neblett (Eds.), Infant Toddlers and Families in Poverty: Research Implications for Early Child Care (pp. 101–123). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hurtado, N., Grüter, T., Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Relative language exposure, processing efficiency and vocabulary in Spanish-English bilingual toddlers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. doi: 10.1017/S136672891300014X. Published online: 23 April 2013.Google Scholar
  18. Hulsen, M., de Bot, K., & Weltens, B. (2002). "Between two worlds": Social networks, language shift, and language processing in three generations of Dutch migrants in New Zealand. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 153, 27–52.Google Scholar
  19. Landry, R., & Allard, R. (1992). Ethnolinguistic vitality and the bilingual development of minority and majority group students. In W. Fase, J. Koen, & S. Kroon (Eds.), Maintenance and loss of minority languages (Vol. 1, pp. 223–251). New York and Philadelphia: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oh, J.S. (2003). Raising Bilingual Children: Factors in Maintaining a Heritage Language, Doctoral dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  21. Pearson, B. Z. (2008). Raising a Bilingual Child: A Step-by-Step Guide for Parents. Living Language, Random House, New York. ISBN 1400023343.Google Scholar
  22. Place, S., & Hoff, E. (2011). Properties of Dual Language Exposure That Influence 2-Year-Olds’ Bilingual Proficiency. Child Development, 82, 1834–1849.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sheng, L., Lu, Y., & Gollan, T.H., (2014). Assessing language dominance in Mandarin-English bilinguals: Convergence and divergence between subjective and objective measures. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17, 364–383.Google Scholar
  24. Tsai, K. M., Park, H., Liu, L. L., & Lau, A. S. (2012). Distinct pathways from parental cultural orientation to young children's bilingual development. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 33, 219–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wang, J. (2012). Factors influencing Chinese Immigrant Children’s Heritage Language Maintenance: An Application of Social Network Analysis and Multilevel Modeling. Doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University, Department of Educational Psychology and Educational Technology.Google Scholar
  26. Wei, L. (1994). Three generations, two languages, one family: Language choice and language shift in a Chinese community in Britain (Vol. 104). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters LTD.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tamar H. Gollan
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jennie Starr
    • 2
  • Victor S. Ferreira
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  2. 2.Tarbuton, Israeli Cultural CenterSan DiegoUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations