Whose statistical reasoning is facilitated by a causal structure intervention?
- 338 Downloads
People often struggle when making Bayesian probabilistic estimates on the basis of competing sources of statistical evidence. Recently, Krynski and Tenenbaum (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 430–450, 2007) proposed that a causal Bayesian framework accounts for peoples’ errors in Bayesian reasoning and showed that, by clarifying the causal relations among the pieces of evidence, judgments on a classic statistical reasoning problem could be significantly improved. We aimed to understand whose statistical reasoning is facilitated by the causal structure intervention. In Experiment 1, although we observed causal facilitation effects overall, the effect was confined to participants high in numeracy. We did not find an overall facilitation effect in Experiment 2 but did replicate the earlier interaction between numerical ability and the presence or absence of causal content. This effect held when we controlled for general cognitive ability and thinking disposition. Our results suggest that clarifying causal structure facilitates Bayesian judgments, but only for participants with sufficient understanding of basic concepts in probability and statistics.
KeywordsBayesian judgment Causal reasoning Base rate neglect Numeracy
This research was funded by a Ph.D. studentship awarded to Simon McNair by the Department of Education and Learning, Northern Ireland.
- Chapman, G. B., & Liu, J. (2009). Numeracy, frequency, and Bayesian reasoning. Judgment and Decision Making, 4, 34–40.Google Scholar
- Cokely, E. T., Galesic, M., Schulz, E., Ghazal, S., & Garcia-Retamero, R. (2012). Measuring risk literacy: The Berlin Numeracy Test. Judgment and Decision Making, 7, 25–47.Google Scholar
- Eddy, D. M. (1982). Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: Problems and opportunities. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Hayes, B. K., Newell, B. R., & Hawkins, G. E. (2013). Causal model and sampling approaches to reducing base rate neglect. In M. Knauff, M. Pauen, N. Sebanz, & I. Wachsmuth (Eds.), Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
- Macchi, L. (2000). Partitive formulation of information in probabilistic problems: Beyond heuristics and frequency format explanations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82, 217–236. doi: 10.1006/obhd.2000.28953
- McNair, S., & Feeney, A. (2014). Does information about causal structure improve statistical reasoning? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 625–645.Google Scholar
- Sedlmeier, P. (1999). Improving statistical reasoning: Theoretical models and practical implications. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.Google Scholar
- Sirota, M., & Juanchich, M. (2011). Role of numeracy and cognitive reflection in Bayesian inference with natural frequencies. Studia Psychologica, 53, 151–161.Google Scholar