Advertisement

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 21, Issue 6, pp 1481–1488 | Cite as

The politics of color: Preferences for Republican red versus Democratic blue

  • Karen B. Schloss
  • Stephen E. Palmer
Brief Report

Abstract

The present study reveals that Election Day differentially affects the color preferences of US Republicans and Democrats. Voters’ preferences for Republican red and Democratic blue were assessed, along with several distractor colors, on and around the 2010 interim and 2012 presidential elections. On non-Election Days, Republicans and Democrats preferred Republican red equally, and Republicans actually preferred Democratic blue more than Democrats did. On Election Day, however, Republicans’ and Democrats’ color preferences changed to become more closely aligned with their own party’s colors. Republicans liked Republican red more than Democrats did, and no longer preferred Democratic blue more than Democrats did. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that color preferences are determined by people’s preferences for correspondingly colored objects/entities (Palmer & Schloss in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107:8877–8882, 2010). They further suggest that color preferences are calculated at a given moment, depending on which color–object associations are currently most activated or salient. Color preferences are thus far more dynamic and context-dependent than has previously been believed.

Keywords

Color preferences Visual aesthetics Political orientation Ecological valence theory (EVT) 

Notes

Author Note

We thank Joseph Austerweil, Bill Prinzmetal, and Melissa Ferguson for insightful discussions and Mathilde Heinemann for help with preliminary analyses. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant Nos. BCS-1059088 and BCS-0745820).

References

  1. Amodio, D. M., Jost, J. T., Master, S. L., & Yee, C. M. (2007). Neurocognitive correlates of liberalism and conservatism. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1246–1247. doi: 10.1038/nn1979 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bensen, C. (2004). Red state blues: Did I miss that memo? (Technical Report). Lake Ridge, VA: POLIDATA Political Data Analysis. Retrieved from www.polidata.org/elections/red_states_blues_de27a.pdf
  3. Elliot, A., & Maier, M. A. (2012). Color-in-context theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 63–125.Google Scholar
  4. Enda, J. (2012, Nov 1). When Republicans were blue and Democrats were red. Retrieved from Smithsonian.com.Google Scholar
  5. Eysenck, H. J. (1941). A critical and experimental study of color preference. American Journal of Psychology, 54, 385–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Farhi, P. (2004, Nov 2). Elephants are red, donkeys are blue; color is sweet, so their states we hue. The Washington Post. Retrieved from www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A17079-2004 Nov1.html
  7. Germine, L., Nakayama, K., Duchaine, B. C., Chabris, C. F., Chatterjee, G., & Wilmer, J. B. (2012). Is the Web as good as the lab? Comparable performance from Web and lab in cognitive/perceptual experiments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 847–857. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0296-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guilford, J. P., & Smith, P. C. (1959). A system of color-preferences. American Journal of Psychology, 72, 487–502.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jost, J. T., & Amodio, D. M. (2012). Political ideology as motivated social cognition: Behavioral and neuroscientific evidence. Motivation and Emotion, 36, 55–64. doi: 10.1007/s11031-011-9260-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.3.339 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kanai, R., Feilden, T., Firth, C., & Rees, G. (2011). Political orientations are correlated with brain structure in young adults. Current Biology, 21, 677–680. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2011.03.017 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Kaya, N., & Epps, H. H. (2004). Relationship between color and emotion: A study of college students. College Student Journal, 38, 396–405.Google Scholar
  13. McManus, I. C., Jones, A. L., & Cottrell, J. (1981). The aesthetics of colour. Perception, 10, 651–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oxley, D. R., Smith, K. B., Alford, J. R., Hibbing, M. V., Miller, J. L., Scalora, M., & Hibbing, J. R. (2008). Political attitudes vary with physiological traits. Science, 321, 1667–1670.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Palmer, S. E., & Schloss, K. B. (2010). An ecological valence theory of human color preference. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 8877–8882. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0906172107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Palmer, S. E., Schloss, K. B., & Sammartino, J. (2013a). Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 77–107. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100504 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Palmer, S. E., Schloss, K. B., Xu, Z. X., & Prado-León, L. R. (2013b). Music–color associations are mediated by emotion. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 8836–8841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schloss, K. B., Poggesi, R. M., & Palmer, S. E. (2011). Effects of university affiliation and “school spirit” on color preferences: Berkeley versus Stanford. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 498–504. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0073-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schloss, K. B., Strauss, E. D., & Palmer, S. E. (2013). Object color preferences. Color Research and Application, 38, 393–411.Google Scholar
  20. Smeekes, A., & Verkuyten, M. (2013). Collective self-continuity, group identification and in-group defense. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 984–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Strauss, E. D., Schloss, K. B., & Palmer, S. E. (2013). Color preferences change after experience with liked/disliked colored objects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 935–943. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0423-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Taylor, C., & Franklin, A. (2012). The relationship between color–object associations and color preference: Further investigation of ecological valence theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19, 190–197. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0222-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Turner, P. J., & Smith, P. (1984). Failure and defeat as determinants of group cohesiveness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 23, 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cognitive, Linguistic, and Psychological SciencesBrown UniversityProvidenceUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations