A growing body of evidence indicates that the perception of visual stimuli is altered when they occur near the observer’s hands, relative to other locations in space (see Brockmole, Davoli, Abrams, & Witt, 2013, for a review). Several accounts have been offered to explain the pattern of performance across different tasks. These have typically focused on attentional explanations (attentional prioritization and detailed attentional evaluation of stimuli in near-hand space), but more recently, it has been suggested that near-hand space enjoys enhanced magnocellular (M) input. Here we differentiate between the attentional and M-cell accounts, via a task that probes the roles of position consistency and color consistency in determining dynamic object correspondence through occlusion. We found that placing the hands near the visual display made observers use only position consistency, and not color, in determining object correspondence through occlusion, which is consistent with the fact that M cells are relatively insensitive to color. In contrast, placing observers’ hands far from the stimuli allowed both color and position contribute. This provides evidence in favor of the M-cell enhancement account of altered vision near the hands.
Object correspondence Attention Embodied cognition Magnocellular Perihand space
This research was supported by an Australian Research Council (ARC) Discovery Early Career Research Award (DECRA) awarded to S.C.G. (No. DE140101734), and by an NSERC discovery grant awarded to J.P. The authors thank Peter Zhang and Erin Walsh for assistance with the data collection.
Brockmole, J. R., Davoli, C., Abrams, R. A., & Witt, J. K. (2013). The world within reach: Effects of hand posture and tool use on visual cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22, 38–44. doi:10.1177/0963721412465065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cousineau, D. (2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorial in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1, 42–45.Google Scholar
Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Montana, J., Gaverick, S., & Abrams, R. A. (2010). When meaning matters, look but don’t touch: The effects of posture on reading. Memory & Cognition, 38, 555–562. doi:10.3758/MC.38.5.555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrington, A. M., & Lennie, P. (1984). Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivities of neurones in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the macaque. Journal of Physiology, 357, 219–240.PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
Dux, P. E., & Marois, R. (2009). How humans search for targets through time: A review of data and theory from the attentional blink. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 71, 1683–1700. doi:10.3758/APP.71.8.1683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodhew, S. C., Boal, H. L., & Edwards, M. (2014). A magnocellular contribution to conscious perception via temporal object segmentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. doi:10.1037/a0035769
Goodhew, S. C., Pratt, J., Dux, P. E., & Ferber, S. (2013b). Substituting objects from consciousness: A review of object substitution masking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20, 859–877. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0400-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hein, E., & Moore, C. M. (2012). Spatio-temporal priority revisited: The role of feature identity and similarity for object correspondence in apparent motion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 975–988. doi:10.1037/a0028197PubMedGoogle Scholar
Hollingworth, A., Richard, A. M., & Luck, S. J. (2008). Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: Transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 163–181. doi:10.1037/0096-34220.127.116.11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 531–556). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Reed, C., Betz, R., Garza, J. P., & Roberts, R. J. (2010). Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 236–245. doi:10.3758/APP.72.1.236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, C., Grubb, J., & Steele, C. (2006). Hands up: Attentional prioritization of space near the hand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 166–177. doi:10.1037/0096-1518.104.22.168PubMedGoogle Scholar