Novel evidence in support of the bilingual advantage: Influences of task demands and experience on cognitive control and working memory
- 2.3k Downloads
The bilingual advantage—enhanced cognitive control relative to monolinguals—possibly occurs due to experience engaging general cognitive mechanisms in order to manage two languages. Supporting this hypothesis is evidence that bimodal (signed language–spoken language) bilinguals do not demonstrate such an advantage, presumably because the distinct language modalities reduce conflict and control demands. We hypothesized that the mechanism responsible for the bilingual advantage is the interplay between (a) the magnitude of bilingual management demands and (b) the amount of experience managing those demands. We recruited adult bimodal bilinguals with high bilingual management demands and examined cognitive control and working memory capacity longitudinally. After gaining experience managing high bilingual management demands, participants outperformed themselves from 2 years earlier on cognitive abilities associated with managing the bilingual demands. These results suggest that cognitive control outcomes for bilinguals vary as a function of the mechanisms recruited during bilingual management and the amount of experience managing the bilingual demands.
KeywordsBilingual advantage Working memory Cognitive control Simultaneous interpreting
We thank Eileen Forrestal, Cynthia Williams, David Rivera, Rob Hills, Vanessa Watson, Ashley Graham, and the participants in this study for their time and effort.
- Cattell, R. B., Cattell, A. K. S., & Institute for Personality and Ability Testing. (1960). Measuring intelligence with the culture fair tests. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.Google Scholar
- Christoffels, I. K., & de Groot, A. M. B. (2005). Simultaneous interpreting: A cognitive perspective. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B. de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches (pp. 326–348). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Gerver, D. (1976). Empirical studies of simultaneous interpretation: A review and a model. In R. W. Briskin (Ed.), Translation: Applications and research (pp. 165–207). New York, NY: Gardner Press.Google Scholar
- Gile, D. (1997). Conference interpreting as a cognitive management problem. In J. H. Danks, G. M. Shreve, S. B. Fountain, & M. K. McBeath (Eds.), Cognitive processes in translation and interpreting (pp. 196–214). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Oberauer, K. (2004). The measurement of working memory capacity. In O. Wilhelm & R. W. Engle (Eds.), Handbook of understanding and measuring intelligence (pp. 393–408). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Padilla, P., Bajo, M. T., Cañas, J. J., & Padilla, F. (1995). Cognitive processes of memory in simultaneous interpretation. In J. Tommola (Ed.), Topics in interpreting research (pp. 61–72). Turku, Finland: University of Turku.Google Scholar
- Raven, J. C. (1962). Advanced progressive matrices: Sets I and II. London, UK: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler adult intelligence scale—WAIS III (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar