Psychonomic Bulletin & Review

, Volume 21, Issue 1, pp 205–210 | Cite as

Thinking one thing, saying another: The behavioral correlates of mind-wandering while reading aloud

  • Michael S. Franklin
  • Benjamin W. Mooneyham
  • Benjamin Baird
  • Jonathan W. Schooler
Brief Report

Abstract

Although mind-wandering during silent reading is well documented, to date no research has investigated whether similar processes occur during reading aloud. In the present study, participants read a passage either silently or aloud while periodically being probed about mind-wandering. Although their comprehension accuracies were similar for both reading conditions, participants reported more mind-wandering while they were reading aloud. These episodes of mindless reading were associated with nearly normal prosody, but were nevertheless distinguished by subtle fluctuations in volume that were predictive of both overall comprehension accuracy and individual sentence comprehension. Together, these findings reveal that previously hidden within the common activity of reading aloud lies: (1) a demonstration of the remarkable automaticity of speech, (2) a situation that is surprisingly conducive to mind-wandering, (3) subtle vocal signatures of mind-wandering and comprehension accuracy, and (4) the promise of developing useful interventions to improve reading.

Keywords

Attention Reading 

Notes

Author Note

M.S.F. and J.W.S. are supported through United States Department of Education Grant No. R305A110277 awarded to J.W.S. In addition, B.W.M. and B.B. are supported by a National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship, under Grant Nos. DGE-1144085 and DGE-0707430, respectively. The content of this article does not necessarily reflect the position or policy of the U.S. Government, and no official endorsement should be inferred. We appreciate the helpful comments that Claire Zedelius made on an earlier draft.

Supplementary material

13423_2013_468_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.6 mb)
ESM 1(PDF 230 kb)

References

  1. Baird, B., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2011). Back to the future: Autobiographical planning and the functionality of mind-wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1604–1611.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bastian, M., Schooler, J. W., & Sackur, J. (2012). Mind-wandering and the little voice of meta-consciousness. Poster presented at the Summer Institute on the Evolution and Functions of Consciousness, Montreal, Canada.Google Scholar
  3. Cannizzaro, M., Harel, B., Reilly, N., Chappell, P., & Snyder, P. J. (2004). Voice acoustical measurement of the severity of major depression. Brain and Cognition, 56, 30–35.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Christoff, K., Gordon, A. M., Smallwood, J., Smith, R., & Schooler, J. W. (2009). Experience sampling during fMRI reveals default network and executive system contributions to mind wandering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 8719–8724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Conan-Doyle, A. (2001). Adventures of Sherlock Holmes. In E . Glinert (Ed.), The adventures and memoirs of Sherlock Holmes. London: Penguin. (Original work published 1892)Google Scholar
  6. Davis, Z. T. (1988). A comparison of the effectiveness of sustained silent reading and directed reading activity on students’ reading achievement. The High School Journal, 72, 46–48.Google Scholar
  7. Eiter, B. M., & Inhoff, A. W. (2008). Visual word recognition is accompanied by covert articulation: Evidence for a speech-like phonological representation. Psychological research, 72(6), 666–674. doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0166-2
  8. Fletcher, J., & Pumfrey, P. D. (1988). Differences in text comprehension amongst 7–8-year-old children. School Psychology International, 9, 133–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Franklin, M. S., Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2011). Catching the mind in flight: Using behavioral indices to detect mindless reading in real time. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 992–997. doi:10.3758/s13423-011-0109-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 230–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Levey, A. B., Aldaz, J. A., Watts, F. N., & Coyle, K. (1991). Articulatory suppression and the treatment of insomnia. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 29, 85–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Horn, J. D. V., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). Wandering minds: The default network and stimulus-independent thought. Science, 315, 393–395.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. McCallum, R. S., Sharp, S., Bell, S. M., & George, T. (2004). Silent versus oral reading comprehension and efficiency. Psychology in the Schools, 41, 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2010). Does mind wandering reflect executive function or executive failure? Comment on Smallwood and Schooler (2006) and Watkins (2008). Psychological Bulletin, 136, 188–197.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mitchell, J. P., Banaji, M. R., & Macrae, C. N. (2005). The link between social cognition and self-referential thought in the medial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1306–1315.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Prior, S. M., Fenwick, K. D., Saunders, K. S., Ouellette, R., O’Quinn, C., & Harvey, S. (2011). Comprehension after oral and silent reading: Does grade level matter? Literacy Research and Instruction, 50, 183–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Reichle, E. D., Reineberg, A. E., & Schooler, J. W. (2010). Eye movements during mindless reading. Psychological Science, 21, 1300–1310.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Reynolds, M., & Besner, D. (2006). Reading aloud is not automatic: Processing capacity is required to generate a phonological code from print. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1303–1323.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schooler, J. W. (2002). Re-representing consciousness: Dissociations between experience and meta-consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 339–344. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01949-6 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Schooler, J. W., Reichle, E. D., & Halpern, D. V. (2004). Zoning out whereas reading: Evidence for dissociations between experience and metaconsciousness. In D. T. Levin (Ed.), Thinking and seeing: Visual metacognition in adults and children (pp. 203–226). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Silvia, P. J., & Gendolla, G. H. E. (2001). On introspection and self-perception: Does self-focused attention enable accurate self-knowledge? Review of General Psychology, 5, 241–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smallwood, J. (2013). Distinguishing how from why the mind wanders: A process–occurrence framework for self-generated mental activity. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 519–535. doi:10.1037/a0030010 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smallwood, J., Fishman, D. J., & Schooler, J. W. (2007). Counting the cost of an absent mind: Mind wandering as an underrecognized influence on educational performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 230–236. doi:10.3758/BF03194057 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smallwood, J., McSpadden, M., & Schooler, J. W. (2008). When attention matters: The curious incident of the wandering mind. Memory & Cognition, 36, 1144–1150. doi:10.3758/MC.36.6.1144 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Smallwood, J., Schooler, J. W., Turk, D. J., Cunningham, S. J., Burns, P., & Macrae, C. N. (2011). Self-reflection and the temporal focus of the wandering mind. Consciousness and Cognition, 20, 1120–1126.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smilek, D., Carriere, J. S. A., & Cheyne, J. A. (2010). Out of mind, out of sight. Psychological Science, 21, 786–789.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Taub, H. A., & Kline, G. E. (1978). Recall of prose as a function of age and input modality. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 725–730.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Teasdale, J. D., Dritschel, B. H., Taylor, M. J., Proctor, L., Lloyd, C. A., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Baddeley, A. D. (1995). Stimulus-independent thought depends on central executive resources. Memory & Cognition, 23, 551–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael S. Franklin
    • 1
  • Benjamin W. Mooneyham
    • 1
  • Benjamin Baird
    • 1
  • Jonathan W. Schooler
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychological and Brain SciencesUniversity of CaliforniaSanta BarbaraUSA

Personalised recommendations