Advertisement

Visual similarity effects in immediate serial recall and (sometimes) in immediate serial recognition

  • Chrissy M. Chubala
  • Dominic Guitard
  • Ian NeathEmail author
  • Jean Saint-Aubin
  • Aimée M. Surprenant
Article

Abstract

Words that sound dissimilar are recalled better than otherwise comparable words that sound similar on both immediate serial recall and immediate serial recognition tests, the so-called acoustic similarity effect. Although studies using immediate serial recall have shown an analogous visual similarity effect, in which words that look dissimilar are recalled better than words that look similar, this effect has not been examined in immediate serial recognition. We derived a prediction from the Feature Model that a visual similarity effect will be observed in immediate serial recognition only when the items are acoustically dissimilar; the model predicts no effect when the items are acoustically similar. Experiments 1 and 2 used visually dissimilar and visually similar stimuli that were all acoustically similar and replicated the visual similarity effect in serial recall but revealed no effect in serial recognition. Experiments 3 and 4 used a second set of stimuli that were acoustically dissimilar and found a visual similarity effect in both serial recall and serial recognition. The experiments confirm the Feature Model’s predictions and add to earlier findings that the two tests, serial recall and serial recognition, may show quite different results because the two tests are not as similar as previously thought.

Keywords

Visual similarity Serial recall Serial recognition Short-term memory Memory models 

Notes

References

  1. Baddeley, A. D. (1966). Short-term memory for word sequences as a function of acoustic, semantic and formal similarity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 362–365. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/14640746608400055 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English Lexicon Project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445-459. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 977-900. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46, 904–911. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Castellà, J., & Campoy, G. (2018). The (lack of) effect of dynamic visual noise on the concreteness effect in short-term memory. Memory, 26, 1355-1363. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2018.1476550 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chubala, C. M., Neath, I., & Surprenant, A. M. (2019). A comparison of immediate serial recall and immediate serial recognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology 73, 5-27. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/cep0000158 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Chubala, C., Surprenant, A. M. Neath, I., & Quinlan, P. T. (2018). Does dynamic visual noise eliminate the concreteness effect in working memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 102, 97-114. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2018.05.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Conrad, R. (1964). Acoustic confusions in immediate memory. British Journal of Psychology, 55, 75–84. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1964.tb00899.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Farrell, S., & McLaughlin, K. (2007). Short-term recognition memory for serial order and timing. Memory & Cognition, 35, 1724–1734. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193505 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149-1160. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gathercole, S. E., Pickering, S. J., Hall, M., & Peaker, S. M. (2001). Dissociable lexical and phonological influences on serial recognition and serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54A, 1-30. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980042000002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gisselgård, J., Uddén, J., Ingvar, M., & Petersson, K. M. (2007). Disruption of order information by irrelevant items: a serial recognition paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 124, 356–369. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.04.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jacobs, J. (1887). Experiments on "Prehension". Mind, 12, 75-79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/os-12.45.75 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. JASP Team (2018). JASP (Version 0.9.2) [Computer software] https://jasp-stats.org/
  15. Jefferies, E., Frankish, C. R., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2006). Lexical and semantic binding in verbal short-term memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 81–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.08.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kass, R. E., & Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayes factors. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 773-795. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1995.10476572 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kinsbourne, M. (1972). Behavioral analysis of the repetition deficit in conduction aphasia. Neurology, 22, 1126-1132. doi: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.22.11.1126 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lian, A., Karlsen, P. J., & Winsvold, B. (2001). A re-evaluation of the phonological similarity effect in adults’ short-term memory of words and nonwords. Memory, 9, 281–299. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210143000074 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lin, Y.-C., Chen, H.-Y., Lai, Y. C., & Wu, D. H. (2015). Phonological similarity and orthographic similarity affect probed serial recall of Chinese characters. Memory & Cognition, 43, 538–554. doi.org:10.3758/s13421-014-0495-xGoogle Scholar
  20. Logie, R. H., Della Sala, S., Wynn, V., & Baddeley, A. D. (2000). Visual similarity effects in immediate verbal serial recall. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53A, 626–646. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/027249800410463 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Logie, R. H., Saito, S., Morita, A., Varma, S., & Norris, D. (2016). Recalling visual serial order for verbal sequences. Memory & Cognition, 44, 590–607. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-015-0580-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide, second edition. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  23. Medler, D. A., & Binder, J. R. (2005). MCWord: An on-line orthographic database of the English language. Retrieved from http://www.neuro.mcw.edu/mcword/
  24. Miller, G. A., Beckwith, R., Fellbaum, C., Gross, D., & Miller, K. J. (1990). Introduction to WordNet: An online lexical database. International Journal of Lexicography, 3, 235–244. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijl/3.4.235 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mueller, S. T., Seymour, T. L., Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E. (2003). Theoretical implications of articulatory duration, phonological similarity, and phonological complexity in verbal working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1353–1380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1353 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Murray, D. J. (1968). Articulation and acoustic confusability in short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 78, 679–684. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026641 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nairne, J. S. (1990). A feature model of immediate memory. Memory & Cognition, 18, 251–269. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213879 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Nairne, J. S., & Neath, I. (2013). Sensory and working memory. In A. F. Healy & R. W. Proctor (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology, second edition, Vol. 4: Experimental Psychology (pp. 419-445). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Neath, I. (2000). Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 403-423. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03214356 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Neath, I., & Nairne, J. S. (1995). Word-Length effects in immediate memory: Overwriting trace decay theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2, 429-441. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210981 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Page, M. P. A., & Norris, D. (1998). The primacy model: A new model of immediate serial recall. Psychological Review, 105, 761–781. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.761-781 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 255-287. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pedersen, T., Patwardhan, S., & Michelizzi, J. (2004). WordNet::Similarity - Measuring the relatedness of concepts. In S. Dumais, D. Marcu, & S. Roukos (Eds.), Proceedings of Fifth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics (NAACL-2004), p. 38-41, Boston. Retrieved from www.aclweb.org/anthology/N04-3012
  34. Peterson, L. R., & Johnson, S. T. (1971). Some effects of minimizing articulation on short-term retention. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 10, 346–354. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(71)80033-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Romani, C., McAlpine, S., & Martin, R. C. (2008). Concreteness effects in different tasks: Implications for models of short-term memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 292–323. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210601147747 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Saito, S., Logie, R. H., Morita, A., & Law, A. (2008). Visual and phonological similarity effects in verbal immediate serial recall: A test with kanji materials. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 1–17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.01.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shallice, T., & Warrington, E. K. (1977). The possible role of selective attention in acquired dyslexia. Neuropsychologia, 15, 31–41. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(77)90112-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Simpson, I. C., Mousikou, P., Montoya, J. M., & Defior, S. (2013). A letter visual-similarity matrix for Latin-based alphabets. Behavior Research Methods, 45, 431–439. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0271-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Thorn, A. S., & Gathercole, S. E. (1999). Language-specific knowledge and short-term memory in bilingual and non-bilingual children. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52A, 303–324. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/713755823 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Thorn, A. S. C., Gathercole, S. E., & Frankish, C. R. (2002). Language familiarity effects in short-term memory: The role of output delay and long-term knowledge. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1363–1383. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980244000198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tse, C.-S., Li, Y., & Altarriba, J. (2011). The effect of semantic relatedness on immediate serial recall and serial recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 2425– 2437. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2011.604787 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ueno, T., & Saito, S. (2013). The role of visual representations within working memory for paired-associate and serial order of spoken words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 1858–1872. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.772645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Wickelgren, W. A. (1965). Short-term memory for phonemically similar lists. American Journal of Psychology, 78, 567-74. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/1420917 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chrissy M. Chubala
    • 1
  • Dominic Guitard
    • 2
  • Ian Neath
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jean Saint-Aubin
    • 2
  • Aimée M. Surprenant
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMemorial University of NewfoundlandSt John’sCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversité de MonctonMonctonCanada

Personalised recommendations