Central tendency representation and exemplar matching in visual short-term memory
- 370 Downloads
I address a recent extension of the generalized context model (GCM), a model which excludes prototypes, to the visual short-term memory (VSTM) literature, which is currently deluged with prototype effects. The paper includes a brief review whose aim is to discuss the background and key findings suggesting that prototypes have an obligatory influence on visual short-term memory responses in the same VSTM task that the GCM’s random walk extension, EBRW, was extended to account for: Sternberg scanning. I present a new model that incorporates such “central tendency representations” in memory, as well as several other regularities of the literature, and compare its prediction and postdictions to those of the GCM on some unpublished Sternberg scanning data. The GCM cannot account for the pattern in those data without post hoc modifications but the pattern is predicted nicely by the central tendency representation model. Although the new model is certainly wrong, the review and modeling exercise suggest a reconsideration of prototype models may be warranted, at least in the VSTM literature.
KeywordsMemory models Recognition Short-term memory Categorization
I thank Robert Sekuler for sharing data and the methodological details of the previously unpublished data to which the models were fit.
- Atkinson, R.C., & Shiffrin, R.M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes 1. In: Psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 2, pp. 89–195). Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Azzalini, A. (1986). Further results on a class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Statistica, 46, 199–208.Google Scholar
- Corbett, J. E., & Melcher, D. (2014). Characterizing ensemble statistics: Mean size is represented across multiple frames of reference. Attention, Perception. Psychophysics, 76(3), 746–758.Google Scholar
- Feller, W. (1968) An introduction to probability theory and its applications Vol. 1. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Grossberg, S. (1982). How does a brain build a cognitive code? In: Studies of mind and brain (pp. 1–52). Springer.Google Scholar
- Huang, J., & Sekuler, R (2010b). Attention protects the fidelity of visual memory: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. The Journal of Neuroscience.Google Scholar
- Macmillan, N.A., & Creelman, C.D. (2005). Detection theory: A user’s guide (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Multidimensional models of perception and cognition (p. 363–393). In F.G. Ashby (Ed.) Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Nosofsky, R. M. (2000). Exemplar representation without generalization? Comment on Smith and Minda’s (2000) Thirty categorization results in search of a model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 26(6), 1735–1743.Google Scholar
- Nosofsky, R. M., Cox, G. E., Cao, R., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2014). An exemplar-familiarity model predicts short-term and long-term probe recognition across diverse forms of memory search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, and Cognition, 40(6), 1524.Google Scholar
- Parzen, E. (1962) Stochastic processes. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
- R Development Core Team (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing [Computer software manual]. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org (ISBN 3-900051- 07-0).
- Woodworth, R. S., & Schlosberg, H. (1954). Experimental psychology. Oxford and IBH Publishing.Google Scholar
- Zaki, S. R., & Nosofsky, R. M. (2001). Exemplar accounts of blending and distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 27(4), 1022–1041.Google Scholar