Advertisement

Memory & Cognition

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 117–129 | Cite as

Visual attentional load affects the frequency of involuntary autobiographical memories and their level of meta-awareness

  • Manila VannucciEmail author
  • Claudia Pelagatti
  • Maciej Hanczakowski
  • Carlo Chiorri
Article
  • 115 Downloads

Abstract

Involuntary autobiographical memories (IAMs) are memories of past events that come to mind without deliberate retrieval attempts. Common in everyday life, IAMs have recently become a topic of experimental investigations with laboratory procedures. In the present study, we build on the recent methodological advancements in the study of IAMs, and we investigate the effects of manipulating the attentional load on the incidence of IAMs, as well as on the level of meta-awareness of these memories. In two experiments, attentional load was manipulated by varying the demands of the focal vigilance task, and reports of IAMs were collected. In Experiment 1, participants were instructed to stop the vigilance task whenever mental contents unrelated to the task came to their minds (self-caught method). In Experiment 2, participants were intermittently interrupted and probed regarding the contents of their experience (probe-caught method) and the level of meta-awareness for these contents. In both experiments, we found a reduction in the frequency of reported IAMs under increased attentional load. Moreover, in Experiment 2, IAMs were characterized by varied levels of meta-awareness, which was reduced by increased attentional load. These results indicate that allocation of attentional resources toward a focal task reduces reporting of IAMs experienced while performing this task because attentional resources play a role in both retrieval of IAMs and the realization that one is experiencing a memory.

Keywords

Involuntary autobiographical memories Autobiographical memory Meta-awareness Attentional load 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Bruno Bocanegra for helpful and thoughtful discussions and advice on the design of Experiment 1. We also would like to thank Martina Fioravanti for her help with data collection.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

All procedures performed in the study are in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Anderson, M. C., & Spellman, B. A. (1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review, 102(1), 68–100. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.1.68 Google Scholar
  2. Antrobus, J. S. (1968). Information theory and stimulus-independent thought. British Journal of Psychology, 59(4), 423−430. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1968.tb01157.x Google Scholar
  3. Asendorpf, J. B., Conner, M., De Fruyt, F., De Houwer, J., Denissen, J. J. A., Fiedler, K., . . . Wicherts, J. M. (2013). Recommendations for increasing replicability in psychology. European Journal of Personality, 27(2), 108–119. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/per.1919
  4. Baddeley, A. (1993). Short-term phonological memory and long-term learning: A single case study. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 129–148. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09541449308520112 Google Scholar
  5. Ball, C. T. (2007). Can we elicit involuntary autobiographical memories in the laboratory? In J. H. Mace (Ed.), Involuntary memory (pp. 127–152). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470774069.ch7 Google Scholar
  6. Barzykowski, K., & Niedźwieńska, A. (2016). The effects of instruction on the frequency and characteristics of involuntary autobiographical memories. PLOS ONE, 11(6), e0157121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157121
  7. Barzykowski, K., & Niedźwieńska, A. (2018). Involuntary autobiographical memories are relatively more often reported during high cognitive load tasks. Acta Psychologica, 182, 119–128. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2017.11.014 Google Scholar
  8. Beaman, C. P., & Williams, T. I. (2010). Earworms (‘stuck song syndrome’): Towards a natural history of intrusive thoughts. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 637–653. doi: https://doi.org/10.1348/000712609X479636 Google Scholar
  9. Berntsen, D. (1996). Involuntary autobiographical memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10(5), 435–454. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0720(199610)10:5<435::AID-ACP408>3.0.CO;2-L Google Scholar
  10. Berntsen, D. (2010). The unbidden past: Involuntary autobiographical memories as a basic mode of remembering. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(3), 138–142. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721410370301 Google Scholar
  11. Berntsen, D., & Hall, N. M. (2004). The episodic nature of involuntary autobiographical memories. Memory & Cognition, 32(5), 789–803. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195869 Google Scholar
  12. Berntsen, D., Rasmussen, A. S., Miles, A. N., Nielsen, N. P., & Ramsgaard, S. B. (2017). Spontaneous or intentional? Involuntary versus voluntary episodic memories in older and younger adults. Psychology and Aging, 32(2), 192–201. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000157 Google Scholar
  13. Berntsen, D., & Rubin, D. C. (2002). Emotionally charged autobiographical memories across the life span: The recall of happy, sad, traumatic, and involuntary memories. Psychology and Aging, 17(4), 636–652. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.4.636 Google Scholar
  14. Berntsen, D., Rubin, D. C., & Salgado, S. (2015). The frequency of involuntary autobiographical memories and future thoughts in relation to daydreaming, emotional distress, and age. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 352–372. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.07.007 Google Scholar
  15. Berntsen, D., Staugaard, S. R., & Sørensen, L. M. T. (2013). Why am I remembering this now? Predicting the occurrence of involuntary (spontaneous) episodic memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(2), 426–444. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029128 Google Scholar
  16. Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological Review, 107, 261–288.Google Scholar
  17. Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125, 159–180.Google Scholar
  18. Evans, L. H., Williams, A. N., & Wilding, E. L. (2015). Electrophysiological evidence for retrieval mode immediately after a task switch. NeuroImage, 108, 435–440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.068 Google Scholar
  19. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A Flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavioral Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  20. Floridou, G. A., & Müllensiefen, D. (2015). Environmental and mental conditions predicting the experience of involuntary musical imagery: An experience sampling method study. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 472–486. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.02.012 Google Scholar
  21. Floridou, G. A., Williamson, V. J., & Stewart, L. (2017). A novel indirect method for capturing involuntary musical imagery under varying cognitive load. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(11), 2189–2199. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1227860 Google Scholar
  22. Forster, S., & Lavie, N. (2009). Harnessing the wandering mind: The role of perceptual load. Cognition, 111(3), 345–355. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.006 Google Scholar
  23. Funder, D. C., Levine, J. M., Mackie, D. M., Morf, C. C., Sansone, C., Vazire, S., & West, S. G. (2014). Improving the dependability of research in personality and social psychology: Recommendations for research and educational practice. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 18(1), 3–12. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313507536 Google Scholar
  24. Goldsmith, M. (2016). Metacognitive quality-control processes in memory retrieval and reporting. In J. Dunlosky & S. K. Tauber (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology: The Oxford handbook of metamemory (pp. 357–385). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Goldsmith, M., Koriat, K., & Weinberg-Eliezer, A. (2002). Strategic regulation of grain size memory reporting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 73–95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.131.1.73 Google Scholar
  26. Hanczakowski, M., Pasek, T., Zawadzka, K., & Mazzoni, G. (2013). Cue familiarity and ‘don’t know’ responding in episodic memory tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 368–383. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.04.005 Google Scholar
  27. Herron, J. E., Evans, L. H., & Wilding, E. L. (2016). Electrophysiological evidence for flexible goal-directed cue processing during episodic retrieval. NeuroImage, 132, 24–31. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.025 Google Scholar
  28. Herron, J. E., & Rugg, M. D. (2003). Retrieval orientation and the control of recollection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 842–854. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/089892903322370762 Google Scholar
  29. Hyman, I. E., Burland, N. K., Duskin, H. M., Cook, M. C., Roy, C. M., McGrath, J. C., & Roundhill, R. F. (2013). Going gaga: Investigating, creating, and manipulating the song stuck in my head. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 204–215. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2897 Google Scholar
  30. Jahng, S., Wood, P. K., & Trull, T. J. (2008). Analysis of affective instability in ecological momentary assessment: Indices using successive difference and group comparison via multilevel modeling. Psychological Methods, 13(4), 354–375. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014173 Google Scholar
  31. Koriat, A., & Goldsmith, M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review, 103(3), 490–517. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.103.3.490 Google Scholar
  32. Kvavilashvili, L., & Mandler, G. (2004). Out of one’s mind: A study of involuntary semantic memories. Cognitive Psychology, 48(1), 47–94. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00115-4 Google Scholar
  33. Levinson, D. B., Smallwood, J., & Davidson, R. (2012). The persistence of thought: Evidence for a role of working memory in the maintenance of task-unrelated thinking. Psychological Science, 23, 375–380. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611431465 Google Scholar
  34. Mace, J. H. (2004). Involuntary autobiographical memories are highly dependent on abstract cuing: The Proustian view is incorrect. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 893–899. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1020 Google Scholar
  35. Mace, J. H. (2007). Involuntary memory. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470774069.fmatter Google Scholar
  36. Maillet, D., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). When the mind wanders: Distinguishing stimulus-dependent from stimulus-independent thoughts during incidental encoding in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 31(4), 370–379. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000099 Google Scholar
  37. Maillet, D., Seli, P., & Schacter, D. L. (2017). Mind-wandering and task stimuli: Stimulus-dependent thoughts influence performance on memory tasks and are more often past- versus future-oriented. Consciousness and Cognition, 52, 55–67. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.04.014 Google Scholar
  38. Mandler, G. (1994). Hypermnesia, incubation, and mind popping: On remembering without really trying. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 3–33). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Mazzoni, G., Vannucci, M., & Batool, I. (2014). Manipulating cues in involuntary autobiographical memory: Verbal cues are more effective than pictorial cues. Memory & Cognition, 42(7), 1076–1085. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-014-0420-3 Google Scholar
  40. McVay, J. C., & Kane, M. J. (2013). Dispatching the wandering mind? Toward a laboratory method for cuing “spontaneous” off-task thought. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 570. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00570 Google Scholar
  41. Moulin, C. J. A., Souchay, C., Buchanan, S., Bradley, R., Karadoller, D. Z., & Akan, M. (2014). Déjà vu in older adults. In B. L. Schwartz & A. S. Brown (Eds.), Tip-of-the-tongue states and related phenomena (pp. 281–304). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Plimpton, B., Patel, P., & Kvavilashvili, L. (2015). Role of triggers and dysphoria in mind-wandering about past, present and future: A laboratory study. Consciousness and Cognition, 33, 261–276. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.01.014 Google Scholar
  43. Poh, J. H., Chong, P. L., & Chee, M. W. (2016). Sleepless night, restless mind: Effects of sleep deprivation on mind wandering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(10), 1312–1318. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000207 Google Scholar
  44. Rasmussen, A. S., & Berntsen, D. (2009). The possible functions of involuntary autobiographical memories. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 23(8), 1137–1152. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1615 Google Scholar
  45. Rasmussen, A. S., & Berntsen, D. (2011). The unpredictable past: Spontaneous autobiographical memories outnumber autobiographical memories retrieved strategically. Consciousness and Cognition, 20(4), 1842–1846. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2011.07.010 Google Scholar
  46. Rubin, D. C. (1995). Memory in oral traditions: The cognitive psychology of epic, ballads, and counting-out rhymes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rubin, D. C., Boals, A., & Berntsen, D. (2008). Memory in posttraumatic stress disorder: Properties of voluntary and involuntary, traumatic and nontraumatic autobiographical memories in people with and without posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 591–614. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013165 Google Scholar
  48. Schlagman, S., Kliegel, M., Schulz, J., & Kvavilashvili, L. (2009). Differential effects of age on involuntary and voluntary autobiographical memory. Psychology and Aging, 24(2), 397–411. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015785 Google Scholar
  49. Schlagman, S., & Kvavilashvili, L. (2008). Involuntary autobiographical memories in and outside the laboratory: How different are they from voluntary autobiographical memories? Memory & Cognition, 36(5), 920–932. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.36.5.920 Google Scholar
  50. Schlagman, S., Kvavilashvili, L., & Schulz, J. (2007). Effects of age on involuntary autobiographical memories. In J. H. Mace (Ed.), Involuntary memory (pp. 87–112). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470774069.ch5 Google Scholar
  51. Schooler, J. W. (2002). Re-representing consciousness: Dissociations between consciousness and meta-consciousness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(8), 339–344. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(02)01949-6 Google Scholar
  52. Schooler, J. W., Smallwood, J., Christoff, K., Handy, T. C., Reichle, E. D., & Sayette, M. A. (2011). Meta-awareness, perceptual decoupling and the wandering mind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(7), 319–326. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.006 Google Scholar
  53. Seli, P., Risko, E. F., Smilek, D., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Mind-wandering with and without intention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(8), 605–617. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.05.010 Google Scholar
  54. Smallwood, J. (2013). Distinguishing how from why the mind wanders: A process-occurrence framework for self-generated mental activity. Psychological Bulletin, 139(3), 519–535. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030010 Google Scholar
  55. Smallwood, J., Nind, L., & O’Connor, R. C. (2009). When is your head at? An exploration of the factors associated with the temporal focus of the wandering mind. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(1), 118–125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2008.11.004 Google Scholar
  56. Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2015). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 487–518. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010814-015331 Google Scholar
  57. Song, X., & Wang, X. (2012). Mind wandering in Chinese daily lives—An experience sampling study. PLOS ONE, 7(9), e44423. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0044423 Google Scholar
  58. Sörqvist, P., & Marsh, J. E. (2015). How concentration shields against distraction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 267–272. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721415577356 Google Scholar
  59. Stawarczyk, D., Cassol, H., & D’Argembeau, A. (2013). Phenomenology of future-oriented mind-wandering episodes. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 425. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00425 Google Scholar
  60. Takarangi, M. K. T., Lindsay, D. S., & Strange, D. (2015). Meta-awareness and the involuntary memory spectrum: Reply to Meyer, Otgaar, and Smeets (2015). Consciousness and Cognition, 34, 1–3. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2015.03.009 Google Scholar
  61. Takarangi, M. K. T., Nayda, D., Strange, D., & Nixon, R. D. V. (2017). Do meta-cognitive beliefs affect meta-awareness of intrusive thoughts about trauma? Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 54, 292–300. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2016.10.005 Google Scholar
  62. Takarangi, M. K. T., Strange, D., & Lindsay, D. S. (2014). Self-report may underestimate trauma intrusions. Consciousness and Cognition, 27, 297–305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2014.06.002 Google Scholar
  63. Teasdale, J. D., Dritschel, B. H., Taylor, M. J., Proctor, L., Lloyd, C. A., Nimmo-Smith, I., & Baddeley, A. D. (1995). Stimulus-independent thought depends on central executive resources. Memory & Cognition, 23(5), 551–559. doi: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197257 Google Scholar
  64. Vannucci, M., Batool, I., Pelagatti, C., & Mazzoni, G. (2014). Modifying the frequency and characteristics of involuntary autobiographical memories. PLOS ONE, 9(4), e89582. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089582 Google Scholar
  65. Vannucci, M., Pelagatti, C., Chiorri, C., & Mazzoni, G. (2016). Visual object imagery and autobiographical memory: Object imagers are better at remembering their personal past. Memory, 24(4), 455–470. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2015.1018277 Google Scholar
  66. Vannucci, M., Pelagatti, C., Hanczakowski, M., Mazzoni, G., & Rossi Paccani, C. (2015). Why are we not flooded by involuntary autobiographical memories? Few cues are more effective than many. Psychological Research, 79(6), 1077–1085. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-014-0632-y Google Scholar
  67. Vannucci, M., Pelagatti, C., & Marchetti, I. (2017). Manipulating cues in mind wandering: Verbal cues affect the frequency and the temporal focus of mind wandering. Consciousness and Cognition, 53, 61–69. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2017.06.004 Google Scholar
  68. Williamson, V. J., Jilka, S. R., Fry, J., Finkel, S., Müllensiefen, D., & Stewart, L. (2012). How do “earworms” start? Classifying the everyday circumstances of involuntary musical imagery. Psychology of Music, 40, 259–284. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735611418553 Google Scholar
  69. Wixted, J. T., & Mickes, L. (2010). A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. Psychological Review, 117, 1025–1054. doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020874 Google Scholar
  70. Zawadzka, K., Hanczakowski, M., & Wilding, E. L. (2017). Late consequences of early selection: When memory monitoring backfires. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 114–127. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.06.003 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manila Vannucci
    • 1
    Email author
  • Claudia Pelagatti
    • 1
  • Maciej Hanczakowski
    • 2
  • Carlo Chiorri
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of NEUROFARBA–Section of PsychologyUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.SWPS University of Social Sciences and HumanitiesWarsawPoland
  3. 3.Department of Educational SciencesUniversity of GenoaGenoaItaly

Personalised recommendations