Hey buddy, why don’t we take it outside: An experience sampling study of prospective memory
Relatively little research has focused on how prospective memory (PM) operates outside of the laboratory, partially due to the methodological problems presented by naturalistic memory research in general and by the unique challenges of PM in particular. Experience sampling methods (ESM) offer a fruitful avenue for this type of research, as recent work from Gardner and Ascoli (Psychology and Aging, 30, 209-219, 2015) has shown. They found that people thought about PM around 15% of the time, and that future thinking was more common than past thinking. In two studies, we replicated our own findings and those reported by Gardner and Ascoli. To summarize, people think about the future more often than the past (30% compared to 13%), and PM occupies our thoughts approximately 13–15% of the time, supporting claims made by some researchers that our episodic memory systems are forward-looking (Klein in Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 2, 222-234, 2013). Of those PM thoughts, participants reported that 61% were internally cued, rather than externally triggered. Through the use of multi-level modeling, we additionally found that PM thoughts were more likely when the respondant was alone than with people, and earlier in the day. Finally, we found that participants higher in neuroticism were more likely to report thinking of PM, and that this was driven entirely by the anxiety facet. Most generally, we hope to have demonstrated the value of ESM to help researchers investigate and understand naturalistic PM.
KeywordsProspective memory Experience sampling ESM Momentary thoughts Future thoughts
We would like to thank our research assistant Xavier Bravo for assistance collecting data, Gil Einstein for brainstorming discussions, and help with statistical analyses from Josh Jackson and his lab (specifically, Leah Schultz and Emorie Beck) and Mike Strube.
The lead author (Francis Anderson) was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship, grant DGE-1745038.
- Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1-9. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lme4 .
- Bolger, N., & Laurenceau, J. P. (2013). Intensive longitudinal methods: An introduction to diary and experience sampling research. New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
- Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 717.Google Scholar
- Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Retrieval processes in prospective memory: Theoretical approaches and some new empirical findings. Prospective memory: Theory and applications, 115-141.Google Scholar
- Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., & Breneiser, J. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McDaniel, M. A., Guynn, M. J., Einstein, G. O., & Breneiser, J. (2004). Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 605-614.Google Scholar
- Medea, B., Karapanagiotidis, T., Konishi, M., Ottaviani, C., Margulies, D., Bernasconi, A., ... Smallwood, J. (2016). How do we decide what to do? Resting-state connectivity patterns and components of self-generated thought linked to the development of more concrete personal goals. Experimental Brain Research, 1-13.Google Scholar
- Nairne, J. S. (2010). Adaptive memory: Evolutionary constraints on remembering. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 53. The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 1-32). San Diego, CA, US: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, R. E., Hunt, R. R., & Murray, A. E. (2017). Prospective memory in context: Moving through a familiar space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43, 189.Google Scholar
- Smith, R. E., Persyn, D., & Butler, P. (2015). Prospective memory, personality, and working memory. Zeitschrift für Psychologie.Google Scholar
- Winograd, E. (1988). Some observations on prospective remembering. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, R. N. Sykes, M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, R. N. Sykes (Eds.) , Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues, Vol. 1: Memory in everyday life (pp. 348-353). Oxford, England: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar