Attending to behaviorally relevant moments enhances incidental relational memory
- 162 Downloads
Memory for the items one has recently encountered is sometimes enhanced in divided attention tasks: Attending to behaviorally relevant items, such as a target in a detection task, boosts memory for unrelated background items (e.g., scenes or words). However, a central feature of episodic memory is memory for the spatiotemporal relationship between items and other elements of an event (relational memory), not just the item itself. Three experiments examined whether attending to a behaviorally relevant target-item boosts memory for the relationship between that item, its features, and a background scene. Participants memorized briefly presented scenes. At the same time, they pressed a button if a second unrelated item (a figure or face) was a particular target color (Experiments 1 and 2) or target gender (Experiment 3) rather than a distractor color or gender. Target and distractor items also varied in task-irrelevant features (shape, location, or facial identity). If attending to behaviorally relevant events influences relational memory, then participants should be better able to report both target-defining and irrelevant features of items that appeared with target-paired scenes rather than distractor-paired scenes. This was the case in all experiments: memory was enhanced for the target-paired scenes as well as the association between a scene and features of the paired target-item. Attending to behaviorally relevant moments therefore has broader effects on memory encoding than previously thought. In addition to boosting memory for unrelated background items, attending to targets facilitates relational memory in these tasks.
KeywordsAttentional boost effect Temporal selection Relational memory Dual-task interference Episodic memory
Compliance with ethical standards
Disclosure of interest
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
- Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annual Reviews of Neuroscience, 28, 403-450. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., Alvarez, G. A., & Oliva, A. (2013). Real-world objects are not represented as bound units: Independent forgetting of different object details from visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 791–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029649 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Conway, M. A. (2009). Episodic memories. Neuropsychologia, 47(11), 2305–2313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.003 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kelley, C. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (2000). Recollection and familiarity. In E. Tulving (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Memory (pp. 215–228). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Knoblauch, K. (2014). psyphy: Functions for analyzing psychophysical data in R (Version 0.1-9). Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psyphy
- Levin, D. T., & Saylor, M. M. (2008). Shining spotlights, zooming lenses, grabbing hands, and pecking chickens: the ebb and flow of attention during events. In T. F. Shipley & J. M. Zacks, Understanding Events: From Perception to Action (pp. 522–554). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Macmillan, N. A., & Creelman, C. D. (2004). Detection theory: A user’s guide. Psychology press.Google Scholar
- Nakabayashi, K., Burton, A. M., Brandimonte, M. A., & Lloyd-Jones, T. J. (2012). Dissociating positive and negative influences of verbal processing on the recognition of pictures of faces and objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(2), 376-390. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025782 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ranganath, C., Yonelinas, A. P., Cohen, M. X., Dy, C. J., Tom, S. M., & D’Esposito, M. (2004). Dissociable correlates of recollection and familiarity within the medial temporal lobes. Neuropsychologia, 42(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2003.07.006 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Robin, J., Buchsbaum, B. R., & Moscovitch, M. (2018). The primacy of spatial context in the neural representation of events. Journal of Neuroscience, 1638-17. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1638-17.2018
- Rubin, R. D., Schwarb, H., Lucas, H. D., Dulas, M. R., Cohen, N. J. (2017). Dynamic hippocampal and prefrontal contributions to memory processes and representations blur the boundaries of traditional cognitive domains. Brain sciences, 7(7), 82-98. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7070082 PubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Spataro, P., Mulligan, N. W., & Rossi-Arnaud, C. (2013). Divided attention can enhance memory encoding: The attentional boost effect in implicit memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(4), 1123-1231.Google Scholar
- Swallow, K. M., & Atir, S. (2018). The role of value in the attentional boost effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818760791.
- Swallow, K. M., & Jiang, Y. V. (2013). Attentional Load and Attentional Boost: A Review of Data and Theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00274
- Swallow, K. M., & Jiang, Y. V. (2014b). The attentional boost effect really is a boost: Evidence from a new baseline. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0677-4
- Tulving, E. (1972). Episodic and semantic memory. In E. Tulving & W. Donaldson (Eds.), Organization of memory (pp. 381-402). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar