Advertisement

Memory & Cognition

, Volume 46, Issue 5, pp 787–795 | Cite as

No evidence for unethical amnesia for imagined actions: A failed replication and extension

  • Matthew L. Stanley
  • Brenda W. Yang
  • Felipe De Brigard
Article

Abstract

In a recent study, Kouchaki and Gino (2016) suggest that memory for unethical actions is impaired, regardless of whether such actions are real or imagined. However, as we argue in the current study, their claim that people develop “unethical amnesia” confuses two distinct and dissociable memory deficits: one affecting the phenomenology of remembering and another affecting memory accuracy. To further investigate whether unethical amnesia affects memory accuracy, we conducted three studies exploring unethical amnesia for imagined ethical violations. The first study (N = 228) attempts to directly replicate the only study from Kouchaki and Gino (2016) that includes a measure of memory accuracy. The second study (N = 232) attempts again to replicate these accuracy effects from Kouchaki and Gino (2016), while including several additional variables meant to potentially help in finding the effect. The third study (N = 228) is an attempted conceptual replication using the same paradigm as Kouchaki and Gino (2016), but with a new vignette describing a different moral violation. We did not find an unethical amnesia effect involving memory accuracy in any of our three studies. These results cast doubt upon the claim that memory accuracy is impaired for imagined unethical actions. Suggestions for further ways to study memory for moral and immoral actions are discussed.

Keywords

Moral Unethical amnesia Memory Imagination Emotion 

Notes

Funding

This project was made possible through the support of a grant from the John Templeton Foundation to F.D.B. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the John Templeton Foundation. This project was also supported by a research grant from the Duke Institute for Brain Science to F.D.B.

Compliance with ethical standards

Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors declared that they had no conflicts of interest with respect to their authorship or the publication of this article.

References

  1. Alicke, M. D., & Sedikides, C. (2009). Self-enhancement and self-protection: What they are and what they do. European Review of Social Psychology, 20(1), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, M. C., & Hanslmayr, S. (2014). Neural mechanisms of motivated forgetting. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(6), 279–292.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5, 323–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, R., Schain, C., & Echterhoff, G. (2014). How selfish is memory for cheaters? Evidence for moral and egoistic biases. Cognition, 132, 437–442. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradley, M. M., Greenwald, M. K., Petry, M. C., & Lang, P. J. (1992). Remembering pictures: Pleasure and arousal in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(2), 379–390.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cahill, L., & McGaugh, J. L. (1995). A novel demonstration of enhanced memory associated with emotional arousal. Consciousness and Cognition, 4, 410–421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cima, M., & van Oorsouw, K. (2013). The relationship between psychopathy and crime-related amnesia. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 36(1), 23–29.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, N. J., & Eichenbaum, H. (1993). Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Craik, F. I. M., Rose, N. S., & Gopie, N. (2015). Recognition without awareness: Encoding and retrieval factors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(5), 1271–1281.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ehlers, A., Hackmann, A., & Michael, T. (2004). Intrusive re-experiencing in post-traumatic stress disorder: Phenomenology, theory, and therapy. Memory, 12, 403–415.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ehlers, A., Hackmann, A., Steil, R., Clohessy, S., Wenninger, K., & Winter, H. (2002). The nature of intrusive memories after trauma: The warning signal hypothesis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 1021–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Escobedo, J. R., & Adolphs, R. (2010). Becoming a better person: Temporal remoteness biases autobiographical memories for moral events. Emotion, 10(4), 511–518.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Evans, C., Ehlers, A., Mezey, G., & Clark, D. M. (2007). Intrusive memories and ruminations related to violent crime among young offenders: Phenomenological characteristics. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20(2), 183–196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Johnson, M. K., Foley, M. A., Suengas, A. G., & Raye, C. L. (1988). Phenomenal characteristics of memories for perceived and imagined autobiographical events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 371–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kensinger, E. A. (2004). Remembering emotional experiences: The contribution of valence and arousal. Reviews in the Neurosciences, 15, 241–251.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kensinger, E. A. (2007). How negative emotion affects memory accuracy: Behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 213–218. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kensinger, E. A. (2009) Remembering the details: Effects of emotion. Emotion Review, 1(2), 99–113.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Kensinger, E. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2006). When the Red Sox shocked the Yankees: Comparing negative and positive memories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 757–763. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kouchaki, M., & Gino, F. (2016). Memories of unethical actions become obfuscated over time. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(22), 6166–6171.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Otgaar, H., Scoboria, A., & Mazzoni, G. (2014). On the existence and implications of nonbelieved memories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(5), 349–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Payne, D. G., Neuschatz, J. S., Lampinen, J. M., & Lynn, S. J. (1997). Compelling memory illusions: The qualitative characteristics of false memories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6(3), 56–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reczek R. W., Irwin, J., Zane, D. M., & Ehrich, K. R. (2017). That’s not how I remember it: Willfully ignorant memory for ethical product attribute information. Journal of Consumer Research. Advance online publication.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucx120
  23. Roediger, H. L., & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(4), 803–814.Google Scholar
  24. Rubin, D. C., Schrauf, R. W., & Greenberg, D. L. (2003). Belief and recollection of autobiographical memories. Memory & Cognition, 31(6), 887–901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Scott, C. L. (2012). Evaluating amnesia for criminal behavior: A guide to remember. Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 35(4), 797–819.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Sedikides, C., & Green, J. D. (2000). On the self-protective nature of inconsistency-negativity management: Using the person memory paradigm to examine self-referent memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 906–922.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on Generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives in Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simonsohn, U. (2015). Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Psychological Science, 26(5), 559–569.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Stanley, M. L., Henne, P., Iyengar, V., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & De Brigard, F. (2017). I’m not the person I used to be: The self and autobiographical memories of immoral actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146, 884–895.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Talarico, J. M., & Rubin, D. C. (2007). Flashbulb memories are special after all; in phenomenology, not accuracy. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 557–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Voss, J. L., Baym, C. L., & Paller, K. A. (2008). Accurate forced-choice recognition without awareness of memory retrieval. Learning & Memory, 15(6), 454–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Voss, J. L., & Paller, K. A. (2009). An electrophysiological signature of unconscious recognition memory. Nature Neuroscience, 12(3), 349–355.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Woodworth, M., Porter, S., ten Brinke, L., Doucette, N. L., Peace, K., & Campbell, M. A. (2009). A comparison of memory for homicide, non-homicidal violence, and positive life experiences. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 32, 329–334.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Matthew L. Stanley
    • 1
  • Brenda W. Yang
    • 1
  • Felipe De Brigard
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Center for Cognitive NeuroscienceDuke UniversityDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Center for Cognitive Neuroscience, Department of Philosophy, Duke Institute for Brain SciencesDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations