Can the effects of temporal grouping explain the similarities and differences between free recall and serial recall?
- 428 Downloads
Temporal grouping can provide a principled explanation for changes in the serial position curves and output orders that occur with increasing list length in immediate free recall (IFR) and immediate serial recall (ISR). To test these claims, we examined the effects of temporal grouping on the order of recall in IFR and ISR of lists of between one and 12 words. Consistent with prior research, there were significant effects of temporal grouping in the ISR task with mid-length lists using serial recall scoring, and no overall grouping advantage in the IFR task with longer list lengths using free recall scoring. In all conditions, there was a general tendency to initiate recall with either the first list item or with one of the last four items, and then to recall in a forward serial order. In the grouped IFR conditions, when participants started with one of the last four words, there were particularly heightened tendencies to initiate recall with the first item of the most recent group. Moreover, there was an increased degree of forward-ordered transitions within groups than across groups in IFR. These findings are broadly consistent with Farrell’s model, in which lists of items in immediate memory are parsed into distinct groups and participants initiate recall with the first item of a chosen cluster, but also highlight shortcomings of that model. The data support the claim that grouping may offer an important element in the theoretical integration of IFR and ISR.
KeywordsWorking memory Free recall Serial recall Grouping Clustering
- Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working Memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. In G. A. Bower (Ed.), Recent advances in learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–90). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Bhatarah, P., Ward, G., Smith, J., & Hayes, L. (2009). Examining the relationship between free recall and immediate serial recall: Similar patterns of rehearsal and similar effects of word length, presentation rate, and articulatory suppression. Memory and Cognition, 37, 689–713.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Broadbent, D. E. (1975). The magic number seven after fifteen years. In A. Kennedy & A. Wilkes (Eds.), Studies in long-term memory (pp. 3–18). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Drewnowski, A., & Murdock, B. B., Jr. (1980). The role of auditory features in memory span for words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 319–332.Google Scholar
- Glanzer, M. (1972). Storage mechanisms in recall. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 5, pp. 129–193). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Henson, R. N. A. (1996). Short-term memory for serial order (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Cambridge: University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
- Johnson, N. F. (1972). Organization and the concept of a memory code. In A. W. Melton & E. Martin (Eds.), Coding processes in human memory (pp. 125–159). Washington: Winston.Google Scholar
- Kahana, M. J. (2012a). Auditory Toronto word pool. Available : http://memory.psych.upenn.edu/WordPools (11th September, 2012)
- Kahana, M. J. (2012b). Foundations of Human Memory. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kahana, M. J., Howard, M. J., & Polyn, S. M. (2008). Associative retrieval processes in episodic memory. In J. Byrne (Series Ed.) H. L. Roediger, III, Vol. (Ed.), Learning and memory: A comprehensive reference. Vol 2: Cognitive psychology of memory. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Spurgeon, J., Ward, G., & Matthews, W. J. (2014). Examining the relationship between immediate serial recall and immediate free recall: Common effects of phonological loop variables but only limited evidence for the phonological loop. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40, 1110–1141.PubMedGoogle Scholar