Advertisement

Learning & Behavior

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 364–373 | Cite as

Behavioral synchronization and affiliation: Dogs exhibit human-like skills

  • Charlotte DurantonEmail author
  • Florence Gaunet
Article

Abstract

Behavioral synchronization is evolutionary adaptive, fostering social cohesion. In humans, affiliation between partners is associated with a high level of behavioral synchronization; people show increased affiliation towards people who synchronize with them. Surprisingly, until recently, little was known about these phenomena at an interspecific level, which is, however, essential to better understand the respective roles of evolution and ontogeny. After presenting why dog–human dyads are a relevant biological model to study this field of social cognition, we review the recent findings about dog–human behavioral synchronization. We summarize recently published findings on behavioral synchronization and affiliation between dogs and humans. We also review results showing that genetic selection modulates behavioral synchronization propensity in dogs, emphasizing the role of genetic selection on dog’s social behaviors towards humans. Finally, we discuss the possible evolutionary influences and proximate mechanisms of this phenomenon. We conclude that, as in humans, behavioral synchronization acts as a social glue between dogs and humans. After dogs’ ability to use human-directional cues or to produce referential cues towards humans, we evidenced a new human-like social process in the dog, at the interspecfic level with humans.

Keywords

Communication Comparative cognition Cognitive ethology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Célicia Lecomte for her drawings.

References

  1. Ákos, Z., Beck, R., Nagy, M., Vicsek, T., & Kubinyi, E. (2014). Leadership and path characteristics during walks are linked to dominance order and individual traits in dogs. PLOS Comp Biol 10(1), e1003446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asendorpf, J. B., Warkentin, V., & Baudonnière, P.-M. (1996). Self-awareness and other-awareness II: Mirror self-recognition, social contingency, awareness, and synchronic imitation. Developmental Psychology, 32(2), 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bunford, N., Andics, A., Kis, A., Miklósi, Á., & Gácsi, M. (2017). Canis familiaris as a model for non-invasive comparative neuroscience. Trends in Neuroscience, 40(7), 438–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Campos, J. J., Anderson, D. I., Barbu-Roth, M. A., Hubbard, E. M., Hertenstein, M. J., & Witherington, D. (2000). Travel broadens the mind. Infancy 1(2), 149–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A., (1999). The chameleon effect: The perception-behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chartrand, T. L., & Lakin, J. L., (2013). The antecedents and consequences of human behavioral mimicry. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 285–308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Clearfield, M. W., Osborne, C. N., & Mullen, M. (2008). Learning by looking: infants’ social looking behavior across the transition from crawling to walking. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 100, 297–307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Dávid-Barrett, T., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2012). Cooperation, behavioural synchrony and status in social network. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 308, 88–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. De Rosnay, M., Cooper, P. J., Tsigaras, N., & Murray, L. (2006). Transmission of social anxiety from mother to infant: An experimental study using a social referencing paradigm. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 44, 1165–1175.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Duffy, D. L., Hsu, Y., & Serpell, J. A. (2008). Breed differences in canine aggression. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 114, 441–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Duranton, C. (2017). Dog–human behavioral synchronization and affiliation (Doctoral dissertation). Marseille: Aix-Marseille University.Google Scholar
  12. Duranton, C., Bedossa, T., & Gaunet, F. (2016). When facing an unfamiliar person, pet dogs present social referencing based on their owner’s direction of movement alone. Animal Behavior, 113, 147–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Duranton, C., Bedossa, T., & Gaunet, F. (2017a). Interspecific behavioural synchronization: Dogs present locomotor synchrony with humans. Scientific Reports. 7, 12384. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-12577-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Duranton, C., Bedossa, T., & Gaunet, F. (2017b). Do shelter dogs engage in social referencing with their caregiver in an approach paradigm? An exploratory study. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 189, 57–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duranton, C., Bedossa, T., & Gaunet, F. (2018a). Pet dogs synchronize their walking pace with that of their owners in open outdoor areas. Animal Cognition. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-017-1155-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Duranton, C., Bedossa, T., Gaunet, F. (2018b). Shelter dogs present activity synchrony but only mere location synchrony with their caregivers when walking in an outside area. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  17. Duranton, C., Bedossa, T. & Gaunet, F (2018c). Pet dogs exhibit social preference for people who synchronize their behaviours with them. Manuscript submitted for publication.Google Scholar
  18. Duranton, C., & Gaunet, F. (2015). Canis sensitivus: Affiliation and dogs’ sensitivity to others’ behavior as the basis for synchronization with humans? Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 10, 513–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Duranton, C., & Gaunet, F. (2016a). Behavioural synchronization from an ethological perspective: Short overview of its adaptive values. Adaptive Behavior, 24(3), 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duranton, C., & Gaunet, F. (2016b). Effects of shelter housing on dogs’ sensitivity to human social cues. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 14, 20–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eken Asp, H., Fikse, W. F., Nilsson, K., & Strandberg, E. (2015). Breed differences in everyday behavior of dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 169, 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fallani, G., Prato Previde, E., & Valsecchi, P. (2007). Behavioral and physiological responses of guide dogs to a situation of emotional distress. Physiology & Behavior, 90, 648–655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ferrari, P. F., Visalberghi, E., Paukner, A., Fogassi, L., Ruggiero, A., & Suomi, S. J. (2006). Neonatal imitation in rhesus macaques. PLOS Biology, 4, e302.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Gácsi, M., Topál, J., Miklósi, Á., Dóka A, & Csányi, V. (2001). Attachment behavior of adult dogs (Canis familiaris) living at rescue centers: Forming new bonds. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 115(4), 423–431.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gaunet, F., Deldalle, S. (2014). Effects of 2 training methods on stress-related behaviors of the dog (Canis familiaris) and on the dog–owner relationship. Journal of Veterinary Behavior: Clinical Applications and Research, 9, 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gaunet, F., & El Massioui, F. (2014). Marked referential communicative behaviours, but no differentiation of the “knowledge state” of humans in untrained pet dogs versus 1-year-old infants. Animal Cognition, 17(5), 1137–1147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Gottlieb, G. (2002). Individual development & evolution. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Gunnarsson, T. G., Gill, J. A., Sigurbjörnsson, T., & Sutherland, W. J. (2004). Arrival synchrony in migratory birds. Nature, 431, 646.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hare, B. (2017). Survival of the friendliest: Homo sapiens evolved via selection for prosociality. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 155–186.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hare, B., & Tomasello, M. (2005). Human-like social skills in dogs? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 439–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hare, B., Brown, M., Williamson, C., & Tomasello, M. (2002). The domestication of social cognition in dogs. Science, 298(5598), 1634–1636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hare, B., Plyusnina, I., Ignacio, N., Schepina, O., Stepika, A., Wrangham, R., & Trut, L. (2005). Social cognitive evolution in captive foxes is a correlated by-product of experimental domestication. Current Biology, 15(3), 226–230.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kaminski, J., Schulz, L., & Tomasello, M. (2012). How dogs know when communication is intended for them? Developmental Science, 15(2), 222–232.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. King, A. J., & Cowlishaw, G. (2009). All together now: Behavioural synchrony in baboons. Animal Behavior, 78, 1381–1387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. King, T., Marston, L. C., & Bennett, P. C. (2012). Breeding dogs for beauty and behaviour: why scientists need to do more to develop valid and reliable behaviour assessments for dogs kept as companions. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 137, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kirschner, S., & Tomasello, M. (2010). Joint music making promotes prosocial behavior in 4-year-old children. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 354–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kis, Á., Bence, M., Lakatos, G., Pergel, E., Turcsán, B., Pluijmakers, J., . . . Kubinyi, E. (2014). Oxytocin receptor gene polymorphisms are associated with human directed social behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris). PLOS ONE, 9, e83993.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  38. Klinnert, M. D., Emde, R. N., Butterfield, P., & Campos, J. J. (1986). Social referencing: The infant’s use of emotional signals from a friendly adult with mother present. Developmental Psychology, 22, 427–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kubinyi, E., Miklósi, Á., Topál, J., & Csányi, V. (2003). Social mimetic behaviour and social anticipation in dogs: Preliminary results. Animal Cognition, 6, 57–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Lakin, J. L., Jefferis, V. E., Cheng, C. M., &Chartrand, T. L. (2003). The chameleon effect as social glue: Evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 27, 145–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R., Bard, E. G., & Jeuniaux, P. (2012). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cognitive Science, 36, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. MacLean, E. L., Herrmann, E., Suchindra, S., & Hare, B. (2017). Individual differences in cooperative communicative skills are more similar between dogs and humans than chimpanzees. Animal Behaviour, 126, 41–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marshall-Pescini, S., Dale, R., Quervel-Chaumette, Q., & Range, F. (2016). Critical issues in experimental studies of prosociality in non-human species. Animal Cognition, 19(4), 679–705.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Mehrkam, L. R., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2014). Behavioral differences among breeds of domestic dogs (Canis lupus familiaris): Current status of the science. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 155, 12–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Merola, I., Marshall-Pescini, S., D’Aniello, B., & Prato-Previde, E. (2013). Social referencing: Water rescue trained dogs are less affected than pet dogs by the stranger’s message. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 147, 132–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Merola, I., Prato-Previde, E., Lazzaroni, M., & Marshall-Peschini, S. (2014). Dogs’ comprehension of referential emotional expressions: Familiar people and familiar emotions are easier. Animal Cognition, 17, 373–385.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Merola, I., Prato-Previde, E., & Marshall-Pescini, S. (2012a). Social referencing in dog owner dyads? Animal Cognition, 15, 175–185.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Merola, I., Prato-Previde, E., Marshall-Pescini, S. (2012b). Dogs’ social referencing towards owner and strangers. PLOS ONE, 7(10), e47653.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Miklósi, Á, Polgárdi, R., Topál, J., & Csányi, V. (1998). Use of experimenter-given cues in dogs. Animal Cognition, 1, 113–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Mogan, R., Fischer, R., & Bulbulia, J. (2017). To be in synchrony or not? A meta-analysis of synchrony’s effects on behavior, perception, cognition and affect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 13–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Mumme, D. L., Fenald, A., & Herrera, C. (1996). Infants’ responses to facial and vocal emotional signals in a social referencing paradigm. Child Development, 67, 3219–3237.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Nagasawa, M., Mitsui, S., En, S., Ohtani, N., Ohta, M., Sakuma, Y., . . . Kikusui, T. (2015). Oxytocin-gaze positive loop and the coevolution of human-dog bonds. Science, 348(6232), 333–336.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Oullier, O., & Scott Kelso, J. A. (2009). Coordination from the perspective of social coordination dynamics. In R. A. Meyer (Ed.), The encyclopedia of complexity and systems science (pp. 8198–8213). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paukner, A., Suomi, S. J., Visalberghi, E., & Ferrari, P. F. (2009). Capuchin monkeys display affiliation towards humans who imitate them. Science, 325(5942), 880–883.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  55. Protopopova, S., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2014). Adopter-dog interactions at the shelter: Behavioral and contextual predictors of adoption. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 157, 109–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Quervel-Chaumette, M., Dale, R., Marshall-Pescini, S., & Range, F. (2016a). Familiarity affects other-regarding preferences in pet dogs. Scientific Reports, 5, 18102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Quervel-Chaumette, M., Mainix, G., Range, F., & Marshall-Pescini, S. (2016b). Dogs do not show pro-social preferences towards humans. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1416.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Richardson, D. C., Dale, R., Shockley, K. (2008). Synchrony and swing in conversation: Coordination, temporal dynamics, and communication. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Richardson, M. J., Marsh, K. L., Isenhower, R. W., Goodman, J. R. L., & Schmidt, R. C. (2007). Rocking together: Dynamics of intentional and unintentional interpersonal coordination. Human Movement Science, 26, 867–891.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Ross, M. D., & Menzler, S. (2008). Rapid facial mimicry in orangutan play. Biology Letters, 4, 27–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sakai, M., Morisaka, T., Kogi, K., Hishii, T., & Kohshima, S. (2010). Fine-scale analysis of synchronous breathing in wild Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops aduncus). Behavioural Processes, 83, 48–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Savalli, C., Ades, C., & Gaunet, F. (2014). Are dogs able to communicate with their owners about a desirable food in a referential and intentional way? PLOS ONE, 9(9), e108003.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  63. Savalli, C., Resende, B., & Gaunet, F. (2016). Eye contact is crucial for referential communication in pet dogs. PLOS ONE, 11(9), e0162161.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Starling, M. J., Branson, N., Thomson, P. C., & McGreevy, P. D. (2013). Age, sex and reproductive status affect boldness in dogs. The Veterinary Journal, 197, 868–872.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Stupacher, J., Maes, P.-J., Witte, M., & Wood, G. (2017). Music strengthens prosocial effects of interpersonal synchronization: If you move in time with the beat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 72, 39–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Svartberg, K. (2006). Breed-typical behaviour in dogs—Historical remnants or recent constructs? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 96, 293–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Svartberg, K., & Forkman, B. (2002). Personality traits in the domestic dog. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 79, 133–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Topál, J., Miklósi, Á., Csányi, V., & Dóka, A. (1998). Attachment behavior in dogs (Canis familiaris): A new application of Ainsworth’s (1969) Strange Situation Test. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112(3), 219–229.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Townsend, S. W., Koski, S. E., Byrne, R. W., Slocombe, K. E., Bickel, B., Boeckle, M., . . . Glock, H. J. (2017). Exorcising Grice’s ghost: An empirical approach to studying intentional communication in animals. Biological Reviews, 92(3), 1427–1433.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Turcsán, B., Kubinyi, E., & Miklósi, Á. (2011). Trainability and boldness traits differ between dog breed clusters based on conventional breed categories and genetic relatedness. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 132, 61–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Udell, M. A., Dorey, N. R., & Wynne, C. D. (2010). What did domestication do to dogs? A new account of dogs’ sensitivity to human actions. Biological Reviews, 85, 327–345.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Udell, M. A. R., Dorey, N. R., Wynne, C. D. L. (2012). Interspecies social learning in dogs: The inextricable roles of phylogeny and ontogeny. In T. R. Zentall & E. A. Wasserman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative cognition (2nd ed., pp. 819–831). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Udell, M. A. R., Lord, K., Feuerbacher, E. N., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2014). A dog’s eye view of canine cognition. In A. Horowitz (Ed.), Domestic dog cognition and behavior: The scientific study of Canis familiaris (pp. 221–240). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Udell, M. A. R., & Wynne, C. D. L. (2010). Ontogeny and phylogeny: Both are essential to human-sensitive behaviour in the genus Canis. Animal Behavior, 79, e9–e14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Valdesolo, P., Ouyang, J., & DeSteno, D. (2010). The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 693–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. van Ulzen, N. R., Lamoth, C. J. C., Daffertshofer, A., Semin, R., & Beek, P. J. (2008). Characteristics of instructed and uninstructed interpersonal coordination while walking side-by-side. Neuroscience Letters, 432, 88–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Wynne, C. D. L. (2016). What is special about dog cognition?. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(5), 345–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Wynne, C. D. L., Udell, M. A. R., & Lord, K. A. (2008). Ontogeny’s impacts on human-dog communication. Animal Behavior, 76, e1–e4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Xavier, J., Tilmont, E., & Bonnot, O. (2013). Children’s synchrony and rhythmicity in imitation of peers: Toward a developmental model of empathy. Journal of Physiology, Paris, 107(4), 291–297.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Zarbatany, L., & Lamb, M. E. (1985). Social referencing as a function of information source: Mothers versus strangers. Infant Behavior and Development, 8, 25–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratoire de Psychologie Cognitive (UMR 7290), Fédération 3CAix-Marseille University and CNRSMarseilleFrance
  2. 2.AVA AssociationCuy-Saint-FiacreFrance

Personalised recommendations