TMS over the superior temporal sulcus affects expressivity evaluation of portraits
When viewing a portrait, we are often captured by its expressivity, even if the emotion depicted is not immediately identifiable. If the neural mechanisms underlying emotion processing of real faces have been largely clarified, we still know little about the neural basis of evaluation of (emotional) expressivity in portraits. In this study, we aimed at assessing—by means of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)—whether the right superior temporal sulcus (STS) and the right somatosensory cortex (SC), that are important in discriminating facial emotion expressions, are also causally involved in the evaluation of expressivity of portraits. We found that interfering via TMS with activity in (the face region of) right STS significantly reduced the extent to which portraits (but not other paintings depicting human figures with faces only in the background) were perceived as expressive, without, though, affecting their liking. In turn, interfering with activity of the right SC had no impact on evaluating either expressivity or liking of either paintings’ category. Our findings suggest that evaluation of emotional cues in artworks recruit (at least partially) the same neural mechanisms involved in processing genuine biological others. Moreover, they shed light on the neural basis of liking decisions in art by art-naïve people, supporting the view that aesthetic appreciation relies on a multitude of factors beyond emotional evaluation.
KeywordsSTS TMS Artworks Emotion
This work was supported by a PRIN grant (2015WXAXJF) by Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research to Z.C.
- Boccia, M., Barbetti, S., Piccardi, L., Guariglia, C., Ferlazzo, F., Giannini, A. M., & Zaidel, D. W. (2016). Where does brain neural activation in aesthetic responses to visual art occur? Meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 60, 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cela-Conde, C. J., Marty, G., Maestú, F., Ortiz, T., Munar, E., Fernández, A., … Quesney, F. (2004). Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101(16), 6321–6325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- de Gelder, B., Watson, R., Zhan, M., Diano, M., Tamietto, M., & Vaessen, M. (2017). Gender-specific brain activation during visual art perception. BioRxiv, 104166. doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/104166
- Di Dio, C., Canessa, N., Cappa, S. F., & Rizzolatti, G. (2011). Specificity of aesthetic experience for artworks: An fMRI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 139.Google Scholar
- Kesner, L., & Horáček, J. (2017). Empathy-related responses to depicted people in art works. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.Google Scholar
- Paracampo, R., Pirruccio, M., Costa, M., Borgomaneri, S., & Avenanti, A. (2018). Visual, sensorimotor and cognitive routes to understanding others’ enjoyment: An individual differences rTMS approach to empathic accuracy. Neuropsychologia, 116(Pt. A), 86–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.01.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Paracampo, R., Tidoni, E., Borgomaneri, S., di Pellegrino, G., & Avenanti, A. (2017). Sensorimotor network crucial for inferring amusement from smiles. Cerebral Cortex, 27(11), 5116–5129.Google Scholar
- Pelowski, M., Markey, P. S., Forster, M., Gerger, G., & Leder, H. (2017). Move me, astonish me… delight my eyes and brain: The Vienna integrated model of top-down and bottom-up processes in art perception (VIMAP) and corresponding affective, evaluative, and neurophysiological correlates. Physics of Life Reviews, 21, 80–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sakuta, Y., Kanazawa, S., & Yamaguchi, M. K. (2014). Shedding light on painters’ implicit knowledge: The effect of lighting on recognizing expression and facial impressions of a depicted person in portraits. Japanese Psychological Research, 56(3), 288–295.Google Scholar