Advertisement

Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

, Volume 18, Issue 5, pp 1015–1033 | Cite as

Neural evidence for the contribution of holistic processing but not attention allocation to the other-race effect on face memory

  • Grit Herzmann
  • Greta Minor
  • Tim Curran
Article
  • 178 Downloads

Abstract

Multiple mechanisms have been suggested to contribute to the other-race effect on face memory, the phenomenon of better memory performance for own-race than other-race faces. Here, two of these mechanisms, increased attention allocation and greater holistic processing during memory encoding for own-race than other-race faces, were tested in two separate experiments. In these experiments event-related potentials were measured during study (the difference due to memory, Dm) and test phase (old/new effects) to examine brain activation related to memory encoding and retrieval, allowing for selective investigations of these memory sub-processes. In Experiment 1, participants studied own-race (Caucasian) and other-race (Chinese) faces under focused or divided attention. In Experiment 2, participants studied own-race (Caucasian) and other-race (African American) faces presented upright or upside down (i.e., inverted). Both experiments showed decreases in memory performance when attention allocation or holistic processing was reduced, but these effects were similar for own-race and other-race faces. Manipulations of holistic processing, but not attention allocation, influenced the neural other-race effects during memory encoding. Inverted own-race faces showed similar neural patterns as upright other-race faces, indicating that when holistic processing of own-race faces was reduced, these faces were encoded similarly as upright other-race faces. No influences of the experimental manipulations on other-race effects during memory retrieval were found. The present study provides the first neural evidence that increased holistic processing during memory encoding contributes to the other-race effect on face memory.

Keywords

Attention Episodic memory ERP Holistic processing Faces Race 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by NIH Grant MH096698, NSF Grant #SMA-1041755 to the Temporal Dynamics of Learning Center, an NSF Science of Learning Center, and NSF Grant #NSF-REU DBI #1560061. It was also supported by The College of Wooster sophomore research program. We would like to thank Chris Bird, Krystin Corby, and Shaina Martis as well as S. Asante, J. Ayers, B. Baker, C. Barton, W. Carpenter, K. Cording, A. Fertman, B. Garcia, I. Goldanloo, J. Graham, K. Heuer, K. Hubert, A. Nye, K. Poston, C. Roark, N. Smith, P. Stroh, B. Swearingen, and R. Wong for research assistance. Portions of the research in this paper use the Color FERET database of facial images collected under the FERET program (Phillips et al., 2000) and the CAS-PEAL face database (Gao et al., 2004) collected under the sponsor of the Chinese National Hi-Tech Program and ISVISION Tech. Co. Ltd.

Supplementary material

13415_2018_619_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.5 mb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 1548 kb)

References

  1. Buckhout, R., & Regan, S. (1988). Explorations in research on the other-race effect in face recognition. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 40–46). Chichester, UK: Wiley.Google Scholar
  2. Craik, F. I., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Collier, A. K, Wolf, D. H., Valdez, J. N., Gur, R. E., & Gur, R. C. (2014). Subsequent memory effects in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 224(3), 211–217.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Cruse, D., & Wilding, E. L. (2009). Prefrontal cortex contributions to episodic retrieval monitoring and evaluation. Neuropsychologia, 47, 2779–2789.Google Scholar
  5. Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 28, 923–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Curran, T. (2004). Effects of attention and confidence on the hypothesized ERP correlates of recollection and familiarity. Neuropsychologia, 42, 1088–1106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Cumming, G. (2012). Understanding the new statistics: Effect sizes, confidence intervals, and meta-analysis. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. DeGutis, J., Mercado, R. J., Wilmer, J., & Rosenblatt, A. (2013). Individual differences in holistic processing predict the own-race advantage in recognition memory. PLOS ONE, 8(4), e58253.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Friedman, D. & Johnson, R. Jr. (2000). Event-related potential (ERP) studies of memory encoding and retrieval: A selective review. Microscopy Research and Technique, 51, 6–28.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Friedman, D. & Trott, C. (2000). An event-related potential study of encoding in young and older adults. Neuropsychologia, 38, 542–557.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gao, W., Cao, B., Shan, S., Zhou, D., Zhang, X., & Zhao, D. (2004). The CAS-PEAL large-scale Chinese face database and evaluation protocols (Technical Report No. JDL_TR_04_FR_001). Beijing, China: Joint Research & Development Laboratory.Google Scholar
  12. Goldstone, R. L. (1998). Perceptual learning. Annual Reviews Psychology, 49, 585–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Hancock, K. J., & Rhodes, G. (2008). Contact, configural coding and the other-race effect in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99, 45–56.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Harrison, S., Gauthier, I., Hayward, W., & Richler, J. J. (2014). Other-race effects manifest in overall performance, not qualitative processing style. Visual Cognition, 22, 843–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hayward, W. G., Crookes, K., & Rhodes, G. (2013). The other-race effect: Holistic coding differences and beyond. Visual Cognition, 21, 1224–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Herzmann, G., Bird, C. W., Freeman, M., & Curran, T. (2013). Effects of oxytocin on behavioral and brain measures of recognition memory for own-race and other-race faces in women and men. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 38, 2140–2151.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Herzmann, G. & Curran, T. (2011). Experts’ memory: An ERP study of perceptual expertise effects on encoding and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 39 412–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Herzmann, G., Minor, G., & Adkins, M. (2017). Neural correlates of memory encoding and recognition for own-race and other-race faces in an associative-memory task. Brain Research, 1655, 194–203.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Herzmann, G., Willenbockel, V., Tanaka, J. W., Curran, T. (2011). The neural correlates of memory encoding and recognition for own-race and other-race faces. Neuropsychologia, 49, 3103–3115.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Horry, R., Cheong, W., & Brewer, N. (2015). The other-race effect in perception and recognition: Insights from the complete composite task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41, 508–524.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Huynh, H., & Feldt, L. S. (1976). Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 1, 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kamp, S., Bader, R., & Mecklinger, A. (2017). ERP subsequent memory effects differ between inter-item and unitization encoding tasks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11.Google Scholar
  24. Loven, J., Herlitz, A., & Rehnman, J. (2011). Women’s own-gender bias in face recognition memory. Experimental Psychology, 58, 333–340.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lucas, H. D., Chiao, J. Y., & Paller, K. A. (2011). Why some faces won’t be remembered: Brain potentials illuminate successful versus unsuccessful encoding for same-race and other-race faces. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 5, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marcon, J. L., Susa, K. J., & Meissner, C. A. (2009). Assessing the influence of recollection and familiarity in memory for own- versus other-race faces. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(1), 99–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marzi, T., & Viggiano, M. P. (2011). Temporal dynamics of face inversion at encoding and retrieval. Clinical Neurophysiology, 122, 1360–1370.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Meissner, C.A. & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces–a meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 7, 3–35.Google Scholar
  29. Meissner, C. A., Brigham, J. C., & Butz, D. A. (2005). Memory for own- and other-race faces: A dual-process approach. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 545–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Neumann, M., End, A., Luttmann, S., & Schweinberger, S. (2015). The own-age bias in face memory is unrelated to differences in attention—Evidence from event-related potentials. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(1), 180–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Palmer, M. A., Brewer, N., & Horry, R. (2013). Understanding gender bias in face recognition: Effects of divided attention at encoding. Acta Psychologica, 142, 362–369.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Phillips, P. J., Moon, H., Rizvi, S. A., & Rauss, P. J. (2000). The FERET evaluation methodology for face recognition algorithms. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 22, 1090–1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ranganath, C., & Paller, K. A. (2000). Neural correlates of memory retrieval and evaluation. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 209–222.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Ricanek, K., Jr., & Tesafaye, T. (2006). MORPH: A longitudinal image database of normal adult age-progression. Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, Southampton, UK.Google Scholar
  35. Richler, J. J., Cheung, O. S., & Gauthier, I. (2011). Holistic processing predicts face recognition. Psychological Science, 22, 464–471.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Ridderinkhof, K. R., van den Wildenberg, W. P. M., Segalowitz, S. J., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: The role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward-based learning. Brain and Cognition, 56, 129–140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Rossion, B., & Michel, C. (2011). An experienced-based holistic account of the other-race face effect. In A. Calder, G. Rhodes, J. V. Haxby, & M. Johnson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of face perception (pp. 215–244). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Rugg, M. D., & Curran, T. (2007). Event-related potentials and recognition memory. Trends in Cognitive Science, 11, 251–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Semplonius, T., & Mondloch, C. (2015). Attentional biases and recognition accuracy: What happens when multiple own- and other-race faces are encountered simultaneously? Perception, 44, 52–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Shriver, E. R., Young, S. G., Hugenberg, K., Bernstein, M. J., & Lanter, J. R. (2008). Class, race, and the face: Social context modulates the cross-race effect in face recognition. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 260–274.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, M. E. (1993). Neurophysiological manifestations of recollective experience during recognition memory judgments. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 1–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Speer, N., & Curran, T. (2008). ERP correlates of familiarity and recollection processes in visual associative recognition. Brain Research, 1174 97–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tucker, D. M. (1993). Spatial sampling of head electrical fields: The geodesic sensor net. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 87, 154–163.Google Scholar
  44. Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Vizioli, L., Foreman, K., Rousselet, G. A., & Caldara, R. (2010). Inverting faces elicits sensitivity to race on the N170 component: A crosscultural study. Journal of Vision, 10, 1–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang, R., Li, J., Fang, H., Tian, M., & Liu, J. (2012). Individual differences in holistic processing predict face recognition ability. Psychological Science, 23, 169–177.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Wiese, H., Kaufmann, J. M., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2014). The neural signature of the own-race bias: Evidence from event-related potentials. Cerebral Cortex, 24, 826–835.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Wiese, H., Stahl, J., & Schweinberger, S. R. (2009). Configural processing of other-race faces is delayed but not decreased. Biological Psychology, 81, 103–109.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Willenbockel, V., Sadr, J., Fiset, D., Horne, G. O., Gosselin, F., & Tanaka, J. W. (2010). Controlling low-level image properties: The SHINE toolbox. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 671–684. CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Wilson, J. P., & Hugenberg, K. (2010). When under threat, we all look the same: Distinctiveness threat induces ingroup homogeneity in face memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 1004–1010. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wolff, N., Kemter, K., Schweinberger, S. R., & Wiese, H. (2014). What drives social in-group biases in face recognition memory? ERP evidence from the own-gender bias. Social, Cognitive, & Affective Neuroscience, 9, 580–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Woodruff, C. C., Hayama, H. R., & Rugg, M. D. (2006). Electrophysiological dissociation of the neural correlates of recollection and familiarity. Brain Research, 1100, 125–135.Google Scholar
  53. Yick, Y. Y., Buratto, L. G., & Schaefer, A. (2015). The effects of negative emotion on encoding-related neural activity predicting item and source recognition. Neuropsychologia, 73, 48–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Yonelinas, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yovel, G., & Paller, K. (2004). The neural basis of the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon: When a face seems familiar but is not remembered. NeuroImage, 21, 789–800.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Zhao, M., Hayward, W. G., & Bülthoff, I. (2014). Holistic processing, contact, and the other-race effect in face recognition. Vision Research, 105, 61–69.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Zhou, G., Pu, X., Young, S. G., & Tse, C.-S. (2014). Effects of divided attention and social categorization on the own-race bias in face recognition. Visual Cognition, 22, 1296–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe College of WoosterWoosterUSA
  2. 2.Department of Psychology and NeuroscienceUniversity of Colorado BoulderBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations