Not my future? Core values and the neural representation of future events

  • Tobias BroschEmail author
  • Yoann Stussi
  • Olivier Desrichard
  • David Sander


Individuals with pronounced self-transcendence values have been shown to put greater weight on the long-term consequences of their actions when making decisions. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we investigated the neural mechanisms underlying the evaluation of events occurring several decades in the future as well as the role of core values in these processes. Thirty-six participants viewed a series of events, consisting of potential consequences of climate change, which could occur in the near future (around 2030), and thus would be experienced by the participants themselves, or in the far future (around 2080). We observed increased activation in anterior VMPFC (BA11), a region involved in encoding the personal significance of future events, when participants were envisioning far future events, demonstrating for the first time that the role of the VMPFC in future projection extends to the time scale of decades. Importantly, this activation increase was observed only in participants with pronounced self-transcendence values measured by self-report questionnaire, as shown by a statistically significant interaction of temporal distance and value structure. These findings suggest that future projection mechanisms are modulated by self-transcendence values to allow for a more extensive simulation of far future events. Consistent with this, these participants reported similar concern ratings for near and far future events, whereas participants with pronounced self-enhancement values were more concerned about near future events. Our findings provide a neural substrate for the tendency of individuals with pronounced self-transcendence values to consider the long-term consequences of their actions.


Core values Future projection Temporal distance VMPFC 



This work was supported by a grant from the Swiss National Research Foundation (grant number PYAPP1_160571) awarded to Tobias Brosch. The research is part of the activities of SCCER CREST, which is financially supported by the Swiss Commission for Technology and Innovation (CTI).


  1. Bain, P. G., Milfont, T. L., Kashima, Y., Bilewicz, M., Doron, G., Garoarsdottir, R. B., . . . Saviolidis, N. M. (2016). Co-benefits of addressing climate change can motivate action around the world (vol 6, pg 154, 2016). Nature Climate Change, 6(5). doi:
  2. Bardi, A., & Schwartz, S. H. (2003). Values and behavior: Strength and structure of relations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(10), 1207-1220. doi: CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1-3), 7-15.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boyer, P. (2008). Evolutionary economics of mental time travel? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12(6), 219-224. doi: CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Brosch, T., Coppin, G., Scherer, K. R., Schwartz, S., & Sander, D. (2011). Generating value(s): Psychological value hierarchies reflect context-dependent sensitivity of the reward system. Social Neuroscience, 6(2), 198-208. doi: CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Brosch, T., & Sander, D. (2013). Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying value-based decision-making: from core values to economic value. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7. doi:
  7. Brosch, T., & Sander, D. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of Value: Perspectives from Economics, Neuroscience, Philosophy, Psychology and Sociology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Buckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007). Self-projection and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2), 49-57. doi: CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Damasio, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 351(1346), 1413-1420. doi: CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. D’Argembeau, A., Stawarczyk, D., Majerus, S., Collette, F., Van der Linden, M., Feyers, D., … Salmon, E. (2010). The neural basis of personal goal processing when envisioning future events. J Cogn Neurosci, 22(8), 1701-1713. doi: CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. D'Argembeau, A., Xue, G., Lu, Z. L., Van der Linden, M., & Bechara, A. (2008). Neural correlates of envisioning emotional events in the near and far future. Neuroimage, 40(1), 398-407. doi: CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. de Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior - How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330-354. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fellows, L. K., & Farah, M. J. (2005). Dissociable elements of human foresight: a role for the ventromedial frontal lobes in framing the future, but not in discounting future rewards. Neuropsychologia, 43(8), 1214-1221. doi: CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Gifford, R., Scannell, L., Kormos, C., Smolova, L., Biel, A., Boncu, S., … Uzzell, D. (2009). Temporal pessimism and spatial optimism in environmental assessments: An 18-nation study. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 1-12. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hare, T. A., Camerer, C. F., Knoepfle, D. T., & Rangel, A. (2010). Value Computations in Ventral Medial Prefrontal Cortex during Charitable Decision Making Incorporate Input from Regions Involved in Social Cognition. Journal of Neuroscience, 30(2), 583-590. doi: CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hitlin, S. (2003). Values as the core of personal identity: Drawing links between two theories of self. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(2), 118-137. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. IPCC. (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, R.K. Pachauri and L.A. Meyer (eds.)]. Geneva, Switzerland: IPCC.Google Scholar
  18. Khachatryan, H., Joireman, J., & Casavant, K. (2013). Relating values and consideration of future and immediate consequences to consumer preference for biofuels: A three-dimensional social dilemma analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 97-108. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lieberman, M. D., & Cunningham, W. A. (2009). Type I and Type II error concerns in fMRI research: re-balancing the scale. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4(4), 423-428. doi: CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Moll, J., Zahn, R., & Oliveira-Souza, R. (2016). The neural underpinnings of moral values. In T. Brosch & D. Sander (Eds.), Handbook of Value (pp. 119-127). New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Morishima, Y., Schunk, D., Bruhin, A., Ruff, C. C., & Fehr, E. (2012). Linking Brain Structure and Activation in Temporoparietal Junction to Explain the Neurobiology of Human Altruism. Neuron, 75(1), 73-79.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Okuda, J., Fujii, T., Ohtake, H., Tsukiura, T., Tanji, K., Suzuki, K., … Yamadori, A. (2003). Thinking of the future and past: The roles of the frontal pole and the medial temporal lobes. Neuroimage, 19(4), 1369-1380. doi: CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Roccas, S., & Brewer, M. B. (2002). Social identity complexity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 88-106. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rohan, M. J. (2000). A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(3), 255-277. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007). Remembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(9), 657-661. doi: CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., Hassabis, D., Martin, V. C., Spreng, R. N., & Szpunar, K. K. (2012). The Future of Memory: Remembering, Imagining, and the Brain. Neuron, 76(4), 677-694. doi: CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Schelling, T. C. (1995). Intergenerational Discounting. Energy Policy, 23(4-5), 395-401. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the Content and Structure of Values - Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Schwartz, S. H. (1996). Value priorities and behavior: Applying a theory of integrated value systems. In C. Seligman, J. M. Olson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The Psychology of Values: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 8, pp. 1-24). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  30. Shantz, A., Saksida, T., & Alfes, K. (2014). Dedicating Time to Volunteering: Values, Engagement, and Commitment to Beneficiaries. Applied Psychology-an International Review-Psychologie Appliquee-Revue Internationale, 63(4), 671-697. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stawarczyk, D., & D'Argembeau, A. (2015). Neural correlates of personal goal processing during episodic future thinking and mind-wandering: An ALE meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp, 36(8), 2928-2947. doi: CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Guagnano, G. A. (1998). A brief inventory of values. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 58(6), 984-1001. doi: CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Suddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. (2007). The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30(3), 299-313; discussion 313-251. doi: PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Van Overwalle, F. (2009). Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis. Hum Brain Mapp, 30(3), 829-858. doi: CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tobias Brosch
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Yoann Stussi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Olivier Desrichard
    • 1
  • David Sander
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland
  2. 2.Swiss Center for Affective SciencesUniversity of GenevaGenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations