Self-affirmation enhances the processing of uncertainty: An event-related potential study
- 177 Downloads
We proposed that self-affirmation can endow people with more cognitive resource to cope with uncertainty. We tested this possibility with an event-related potential (ERP) study by examining how self-affirmation influences ambiguous feedback processing in a simple gambling task, which was used to investigate risk decision-making. We assigned 48 participants randomly to the affirmation and non-affirmation (i.e., control) groups. All participants accepted the manipulation first and then completed the gambling task with an electroencephalogram (EEG) recording, in which participants might receive a positive (winning), negative (losing), or ambiguous (unknown valence) outcome after they made a choice. We considered both the feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P3 components elicited by the outcome feedback, which reflected the amount of cognitive resources being invested in the early and late stages of the outcome feedback processing, respectively. ERP results showed that ambiguous feedback elicited a larger FRN among affirmed participants than unaffirmed participants but exerted no influence on the P3. This finding suggests that self-affirmation may help coping with uncertainty by enhancing the early processing of uncertainty.
KeywordsSelf-affirmation Uncertainty Cognitive resource Outcome feedback Event-related potential (ERP) Feedback-related negativity (FRN)
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31571148, 31571124).
RG and HC conceived and designed the experiments. JY performed the experiments. RG and JY analyzed the data. RG, ZY, ZH, and HC wrote and revised the manuscript.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
- Becker, M. P., Nitsch, A. M., Miltner, W. H., & Straube, T. (2014). A single-trial estimation of the feedback-related negativity and its relation to BOLD responses in a time-estimation task. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(8), 3005-3012. doi: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3684-13.2014 Google Scholar
- Cascio, C. N., O'Donnell, M. B., Tinney, F. J., Lieberman, M. D., Taylor, S. E., Strecher, V. J., & Falk, E. B. (2016). Self-affirmation activates brain systems associated with self-related processing and reward and is reinforced by future orientation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(4), 621-629. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsv136 Google Scholar
- Cohen, G. L., & Sherman, D. K. (2014). The psychology of change: Self-affirmation and social psychological intervention. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 333-371. doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115137 Google Scholar
- Engle, R. W., Conway, A. R., Tuholski, S. W., & Shisler, R. J. (1995). A resource account of inhibition. Psychological Science, 6(2), 122-125. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1995.tb00318.x Google Scholar
- Fox, C. R., Erner, C., & Walters, D. J. (2016). Decision Under risk: From the field to the laboratory and back. In G. Keren & G. Wu (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (Vol. 1, pp. 43-88). West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Gu, R., Lei, Z., Broster, L., Wu, T., Jiang, Y., & Luo, Y. J. (2011). Beyond valence and magnitude: A flexible evaluative coding system in the brain. Neuropsychologia, 49(14), 3891-3897. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.006 Google Scholar
- Jonas, E., Mcgregor, I., Klackl, J., Agroskin, D., Fritsche, I., Holbrook, C., ... Quirin, M. (2014). Threat and defense: From anxiety to approach. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 49, pp. 219-286). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Li, P., Song, X., Wang, J., Zhou, X., Li, J., Lin, F., ... Roberson, D. (2015). Reduced sensitivity to neutral feedback versus negative feedback in subjects with mild depression: Evidence from event-related potentials study. Brain and Cognition, 100, 15-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2015.08.004
- Miltner, W. H. R., Braun, C. H., & Coles, M. G. H. (1997). Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: Evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9(6), 788-798. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.19184.108.40.2068 Google Scholar
- Oliveira, F. T. P., McDonald, J. J., & Goodman, D. (2007). Performance monitoring in the anterior cingulate is not all error related: Expectancy deviation and the representation of action-outcome associations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(12), 1994-2004. doi: https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.12.1994 Google Scholar
- Pfabigan, D. M., Seidel, E. M., Paul, K., Grahl, A., Sailer, U., Lanzenberger, R., ... Lamm, C. (2015). Context-sensitivity of the feedback-related negativity for zero-value feedback outcomes. Biological Psychology, 104, 184-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2014.12.007
- Pintzinger, N. M., Pfabigan, D. M., Pfau, L., Kryspin-Exner, I., & Lamm, C. (2017). Temperament differentially influences early information processing in men and women: Preliminary electrophysiological evidence of attentional biases in healthy individuals. Biological Psychology, 122, 69-79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.07.007 Google Scholar
- Posner, M. I., Snyder, C. R., & Solso, R. (2004). Attention and cognitive control. In D. A. Balota & E. J. Marsh (Eds.), Cognitive psychology: Key readings. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23(6), 695–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00696.x
- Sherman, D. K., & Cohen, G. L. (2006). The psychology of self-defense: Self-affirmation theory. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 38, pp. 183-242). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Sherman, D. K., & Hartson, K. A. (2010). Reconciling self-protection with self-improvement. In M. D. Alicke & C. Sedikides (Eds.), Handbook of self-enhancement and self-protection (pp. 128-151). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Smith, B. W., Mitchell, D. G., Hardin, M. G., Jazbec, S., Fridberg, D., Blair, R. J., & Ernst, M. (2009). Neural substrates of reward magnitude, probability, and risk during a wheel of fortune decision-making task. Neuroimage, 44(2), 600-609. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.016 Google Scholar
- Steele, C. M. (1988). The psychology of self-affirmation: Sustaining the integrity of the self. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 21, pp. 261-302). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Summerfield, C., Behrens, T. E., & Koechlin, E. (2011). Perceptual classification in a rapidly changing environment. Neuron, 71(4), 725–736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.06.022
- Zhu, X., Zhang, H., Wu, L., Yang, S., Wu, H., Luo, W., ... Luo, Y. J. (2018). The influence of self-construals on the ERP response to the rewards for self and mother. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(2), 366-374. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-018-0575-7