Advertisement

Attributed social context and emotional content recruit frontal and limbic brain regions during virtual feedback processing

  • Sebastian SchindlerEmail author
  • Onno Kruse
  • Rudolf Stark
  • Johanna Kissler
Article

Abstract

In communication, who is communicating can be just as important as what is said. However, sender identity in virtual communication is often inferred rather than perceived. Therefore, the present research investigates the brain structures activated by sender identity attributions and evaluative feedback processing during virtual communication. In a functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study, 32 participants were told that they would receive personality feedback, either sent from another human participant or from a randomly acting computer. In reality, both conditions contained random but counterbalanced feedback, automatically delivered by approving or denying negative, neutral, or positive adjectives. Although physically identical, feedback attributed to the “human” sender activated multiple regions within a "social brain" network, including the superior frontal, medial prefrontal, and orbitofrontal cortex, anterior and posterior parts of the cingulate cortex, and the bilateral insula. Regardless of attributed sender, positive feedback increased responses in the striatum and bilateral amygdalae, while negative compared to neutral feedback elicited stronger insula and somatosensory responses. These results reveal the recruitment of an extensive mentalizing and social brain network by mere sender attributions and the activation of brain structures related to reward and punishment by verbal feedback, demonstrating its embodied processing.

Keywords

Virtual communication Social context Social feedback Emotion Language fMRI 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with respect to their authorship or the publication of this article. We thank all participants who contributed to this study. This work was supported by the Bielefelder Nachwuchsfond (Bielefeld University) and a Research Training Fellowship of the Society of Psychophysiological Research (SPR) awarded to SS.

Supplementary material

13415_2018_660_MOESM1_ESM.docx (49 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 48 kb)

References

  1. Adolphs, R. (2009). The social brain: neural basis of social knowledge. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 693.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Anders, S., Heinzle, J., Weiskopf, N., Ethofer, T., & Haynes, J.-D. (2011). Flow of affective information between communicating brains. NeuroImage, 54, 439–446.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Báez-Mendoza, R., & Schultz, W. (2013). The role of the striatum in social behavior. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 233.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Hautzinger, M. (2001). Beck-Depressions-Inventar (BDI): Testhandbuch (2., überarb. Aufl., 1. Nachdr). Bern: Huber.Google Scholar
  5. Berridge, K. C., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2015). Pleasure systems in the brain. Neuron, 86(3), 646–664.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Bickart, K. C., Dickerson, B. C., & Barrett, L. F. (2014). The amygdala as a hub in brain networks that support social life. Neuropsychologia, 63, 235–248.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Biocca, F., & Levy, M. R. (2013). Communication in the age of virtual reality. Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: the Self-Assessment Manikin and the Semantic Differential. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry, 25, 49-59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cacioppo, S., Frum, C., Asp, E., Weiss, R. M., Lewis, J. W., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2013). A Quantitative Meta-Analysis of Functional Imaging Studies of Social Rejection. Scientific Reports, 3, 2027.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep02027 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Caruana, N., Lissa, P. de, & McArthur, G. (2017a). Beliefs about human agency influence the neural processing of gaze during joint attention. Social Neuroscience, 12(2), 194–206.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2016.1160953
  11. Caruana, N., McArthur, G., Woolgar, A., & Brock, J. (2017b). Simulating social interactions for the experimental investigation of joint attention. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 74, 115–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.12.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caruana, N., Spirou, D., & Brock, J. (2017c). Human agency beliefs influence behaviour during virtual social interactions. PeerJ, 5, e3819.  https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3819 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaminade, T., Rosset, D., Fonseca, D. D., Nazarian, B., Lutcher, E., Cheng, G., & Deruelle, C. (2012). How do we think machines think? An fMRI study of alleged competition with an artificial intelligence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6.Google Scholar
  14. Cremers, H. R., Demenescu, L. R., Aleman, A., Renken, R., van Tol, M.-J., van der Wee, N. J. A., … Roelofs, K. (2010). Neuroticism modulates amygdala—prefrontal connectivity in response to negative emotional facial expressions. NeuroImage, 49(1), 963–970.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.08.023 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Dennett, D. C. (1989). The intentional stance. MIT press.Google Scholar
  16. Dumas, G., Guzman, G. C. de, Tognoli, E., & Kelso, J. A. S. (2014). The human dynamic clamp as a paradigm for social interaction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(35), E3726–E3734.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1407486111
  17. Eisenberger, N. I., Inagaki, T. K., Muscatell, K. A., Haltom, K. E. B., & Leary, M. R. (2011). The neural sociometer: Brain mechanisms underlying state self-esteem. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23, 3448–3455.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Eklund, A., Nichols, T. E., & Knutsson, H. (2016). Cluster failure: Why fMRI inferences for spatial extent have inflated false-positive rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(28), 7900–7905.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1602413113 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ferrara, E., Varol, O., Davis, C., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2016). The rise of social bots. Communications of the ACM, 59(7), 96–104.  https://doi.org/10.1145/2818717 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gazzola, V., Spezio, M. L., Etzel, J. A., Castelli, F., Adolphs, R., & Keysers, C. (2012). Primary somatosensory cortex discriminates affective significance in social touch. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(25), E1657–E1666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gu, X., Hof, P. R., Friston, K. J., & Fan, J. (2013). Anterior insular cortex and emotional awareness. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 521(15), 3371–3388.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cne.23368 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Harlé, K. M., Chang, L. J., van ’t Wout, M., & Sanfey, A. G. (2012). The neural mechanisms of affect infusion in social economic decision-making: a mediating role of the anterior insula. NeuroImage, 61, 32–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Hasson, U., & Frith, C. D. (2016). Mirroring and beyond: coupled dynamics as a generalized framework for modelling social interactions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 371(1693), 20150366.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0366 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Hasson, U., Nir, Y., Levy, I., Fuhrmann, G., & Malach, R. (2004). Intersubject Synchronization of Cortical Activity During Natural Vision. Science, 303(5664), 1634–1640.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1089506 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Hasson, U., Yang, E., Vallines, I., Heeger, D. J., & Rubin, N. (2008). A Hierarchy of Temporal Receptive Windows in Human Cortex. Journal of Neuroscience, 28(10), 2539–2550.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5487-07.2008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Heleven, E., & Overwalle, F. V. (2018). Neural representations of others in the medial prefrontal cortex do not depend on our knowledge about them. Social Neuroscience, 0(0), 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2018.1472139 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hepper, E. G., Hart, C. M., Gregg, A. P., & Sedikides, C. (2011). Motivated expectations of positive feedback in social interactions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 151, 455–477.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Herbert, C., Ethofer, T., Anders, S., Junghofer, M., Wildgruber, D., Grodd, W., & Kissler, J. (2009). Amygdala activation during reading of emotional adjectives—An advantage for pleasant content. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 35–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Herbert, C., Herbert, B. M., & Pauli, P. (2011). Emotional self-reference: Brain structures involved in the processing of words describing one’s own emotions. Neuropsychologia, 49, 2947–2956.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Hughes, B. L., & Beer, J. S. (2012). Protecting the Self: The Effect of Social-evaluative Threat on Neural Representations of Self. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(4), 613–622.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00343 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Izuma, K., Saito, D. N., & Sadato, N. (2008). Processing of social and monetary rewards in the human striatum. Neuron, 58, 284-94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Izuma, K., Saito, D. N., & Sadato, N. (2010). Processing of the incentive for social approval in the ventral striatum during charitable donation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 621–631.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Kim, H., Somerville, L. H., Johnstone, T., Polis, S., Alexander, A., Shin, L. M., & Whalen, P. J. (2004). Contextual modulation of amygdala responsivity to surprised faces. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(10), 1730–1745.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Kircher, T., Blumel, I., Marjoram, D., Lataster, T., Krabbendam, L., Weber, J., … Krach, S. (2009). Online mentalising investigated with functional MRI. Neuroscience Letters, 454, 176-81.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2009.03.026.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Klucken, T., Kruse, O., Wehrum-Osinsky, S., Hennig, J., Schweckendiek, J., & Stark, R. (2015). Impact of COMT Val158Met-polymorphism on appetitive conditioning and amygdala/prefrontal effective connectivity. Human Brain Mapping, 36(3), 1093–1101.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22688 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Korn, C. W., Prehn, K., Park, S. Q., Walter, H., & Heekeren, H. R. (2012). Positively biased processing of self-relevant social feedback. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 16832–16844.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Kross, E., Berman, M. G., Mischel, W., Smith, E. E., & Wager, T. D. (2011). Social rejection shares somatosensory representations with physical pain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(15), 6270–6275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kruse, O., Tapia León, I., Stark, R., & Klucken, T. (2017). Neural correlates of appetitive extinction in humans. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(1), 106–115.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw157 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Kuhlen, A. K., Bogler, C., Brennan, S. E., & Haynes, J.-D. (2017). Brains in dialogue: decoding neural preparation of speaking to a conversational partner. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12(6), 871–880.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsx018 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Laeger, I., Dobel, C., Dannlowski, U., Kugel, H., Grotegerd, D., Kissler, J., … Zwanzger, P. (2012). Amygdala responsiveness to emotional words is modulated by subclinical anxiety and depression. Behavioural Brain Research, 233(2), 508–516.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Lasswell, H. D. (1948). The structure and function of communication in society. The Communication of Ideas, 37, 215–228.Google Scholar
  42. Lee, P. (2016). Learning from Tay’s introduction. Retrieved July 15, 2016, from http://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2016/03/25/learning-tays-introduction/
  43. Lieberman, M. D. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: a review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259-89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Liljeholm, M., Dunne, S., & O’Doherty, J. P. (2014). Anterior Insula Activity Reflects the Effects of Intentionality on the Anticipation of Aversive Stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(34), 11339–11348.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1126-14.2014 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lucas, G. M., Gratch, J., King, A., & Morency, L.-P. (2014). It’s only a computer: virtual humans increase willingness to disclose. Computers in Human Behavior, 37, 94–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Masten, C. L., Eisenberger, N. I., Borofsky, L. A., Pfeifer, J. H., McNealy, K., Mazziotta, J. C., & Dapretto, M. (2009). Neural correlates of social exclusion during adolescence: Understanding the distress of peer rejection. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 4, 143–157.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Masten, C. L., Morelli, S. A., & Eisenberger, N. I. (2011). An fMRI investigation of empathy for “social pain” and subsequent prosocial behavior. NeuroImage, 55, 381–388.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Menon, V., & Uddin, L. Q. (2010). Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Structure and Function, 214(5–6), 655–667.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-010-0262-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Michael, K. (2016). Science Fiction Is Full of Bots That Hurt People: ...But these bots are here now. IEEE Consumer Electronics Magazine, 5(4), 112–117.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MCE.2016.2590218 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Molenberghs, P., Johnson, H., Henry, J. D., & Mattingley, J. B. (2016). Understanding the minds of others: A neuroimaging meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 65, 276–291.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Niedenthal, P. M. (2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316(5827), 1002–1005.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136930 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Nieuwenhuys, R. (2012). The insular cortex: a review. In Progress in brain research (Vol. 195, pp. 123–163). Elsevier.Google Scholar
  53. Northoff, G., & Bermpohl, F. (2004). Cortical midline structures and the self. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 102-7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Northoff, G., Heinzel, A., de Greck, M., Bermpohl, F., Dobrowolny, H., & Panksepp, J. (2006). Self-referential processing in our brain—A meta-analysis of imaging studies on the self. NeuroImage, 31(1), 440–457.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.12.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Peterburs, J., Sandrock, C., Miltner, W. H. R., & Straube, T. (2016). Look who’s judging—Feedback source modulates brain activation to performance feedback in social anxiety. NeuroImage.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.036
  56. Pfeiffer, U. J., Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Kuzmanovic, B., Georgescu, A. L., Bente, G., & Vogeley, K. (2014). Why we interact: On the functional role of the striatum in the subjective experience of social interaction. NeuroImage, 101, 124–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.061 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Phan, K. L., Sripada, C. S., Angstadt, M., & McCabe, K. (2010). Reputation for reciprocity engages the brain reward center. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 13099–13104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ponz, A., Montant, M., Liegeois-Chauvel, C., Silva, C., Braun, M., Jacobs, A. M., & Ziegler, J. C. (2013). Emotion processing in words: a test of the neural re-use hypothesis using surface and intracranial EEG. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, nst034.Google Scholar
  59. Pulvermüller, F. (2005). Brain mechanisms linking language and action. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 6(7), 576–582.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1706 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Richter, M., Eck, J., Straube, T., Miltner, W. H., & Weiss, T. (2010). Do words hurt? Brain activation during the processing of pain-related words. Pain, 148(2), 198–205.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Rotge, J.-Y., Lemogne, C., Hinfray, S., Huguet, P., Grynszpan, O., Tartour, E., … Fossati, P. (2014). A meta-analysis of the anterior cingulate contribution to social pain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, nsu110.Google Scholar
  62. Sabatinelli, D., Bradley, M. M., Lang, P. J., Costa, V. D., & Versace, F. (2007). Pleasure Rather Than Salience Activates Human Nucleus Accumbens and Medial Prefrontal Cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 98(3), 1374–1379.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00230.2007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Saito, D. N., Tanabe, H. C., Izuma, K., Hayashi, M. J., Morito, Y., Komeda, H., … Sadato, N. (2010). “Stay Tuned”: Inter-individual neural synchronization during mutual gaze and joint attention. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 4.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2010.00127
  64. Sander, D., Grandjean, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2005). A systems approach to appraisal mechanisms in emotion. Neural Networks, 18(4), 317–352.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2005.03.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. van Schie, C. C., Chiu, C.-D., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Heiser, W. J., & Elzinga, B. M. (2018). When compliments do not hit but critiques do: an fMRI study into self-esteem and self-knowledge in processing social feedback. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 13(4), 404–417.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsy014
  66. Schilbach, L., Timmermans, B., Reddy, V., Costall, A., Bente, G., Schlicht, T., & Vogeley, K. (2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(04), 393–414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Schindler, S., & Kissler, J. (2016). People matter: Perceived sender identity modulates cerebral processing of socio-emotional language feedback. NeuroImage, 134, 160–169.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.052 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Schindler, S., & Kissler, J. (2018). Language-based social feedback processing with randomized “senders”: An ERP study. Social Neuroscience, 13(2), 202–213.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2017.1285249 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Schindler, S., Wegrzyn, M., Steppacher, I., & Kissler, J. (2015). Perceived Communicative Context and Emotional Content Amplify Visual Word Processing in the Fusiform Gyrus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(15), 6010–6019.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3346-14.2015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Schlenker, B. R., & Weigold, M. F. (1992). Interpersonal Processes Involving Impression Regulation and Management. Annual Review of Psychology, 43(1), 133–168.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.001025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schurz, M., Radua, J., Aichhorn, M., Richlan, F., & Perner, J. (2014). Fractionating theory of mind: A meta-analysis of functional brain imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 42, 9–34.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.01.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Shrauger, J. S., & Schoeneman, T. J. (1979). Symbolic interactionist view of self-concept: Through the looking glass darkly. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Singer, T., Kiebel, S. J., Winston, J. S., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D. (2004). Brain responses to the acquired moral status of faces. Neuron, 41, 653-62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Somerville, L. H., Kelley, W. M., & Heatherton, T. F. (2010). Self-esteem modulates medial prefrontal cortical responses to evaluative social feedback. Cerebral Cortex, 20, 3005–3013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Uddin, L. Q., Iacoboni, M., Lange, C., & Keenan, J. P. (2007). The self and social cognition: the role of cortical midline structures and mirror neurons. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(4), 153–157.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Veer, I. M., Oei, N. Y. L., Spinhoven, P., van Buchem, M. A., Elzinga, B. M., & Rombouts, S. A. R. B. (2011). Beyond acute social stress: Increased functional connectivity between amygdala and cortical midline structures. NeuroImage, 57(4), 1534–1541.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.074 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Watson, L. A., Dritschel, B., Obonsawin, M. C., & Jentzsch, I. (2007). Seeing yourself in a positive light: brain correlates of the self-positivity bias. Brain Research, 1152, 106-10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Wiese, E., Metta, G., & Wykowska, A. (2017). Robots as intentional agents: Using neuroscientific methods to make robots appear more social. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01663
  79. Wykowska, A., Wiese, E., Prosser, A., & Müller, H. J. (2014). Beliefs about the Minds of Others Influence How We Process Sensory Information. PLOS ONE, 9(4), e94339.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0094339 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  80. Wyvell, C. L., & Berridge, K. C. (2000). Intra-accumbens amphetamine increases the conditioned incentive salience of sucrose reward: enhancement of reward “wanting” without enhanced “liking” or response reinforcement. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(21), 8122–8130.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Medical Psychology and Systems NeuroscienceUniversity of MuensterMuensterGermany
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany
  3. 3.Department of Psychotherapy and Systems NeuroscienceJustus Liebig University GiessenGießenGermany
  4. 4.Department of Clinical PsychologyUniversity of SiegenSiegenGermany
  5. 5.Center of Excellence “Cognitive Interaction Technology” (CITEC)Bielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations