Advertisement

Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 154–164 | Cite as

Concurrent emotional response and semantic unification: An event-related potential study

  • Yang Cao
  • Yufang Yang
  • Lin WangEmail author
Article

Abstract

Using event-related potentials, in this study we examined how implied emotion is derived from sentences. In the same sentential context, different emotionally neutral words rendered the whole sentence emotionally neutral and semantically congruent, emotionally negative and semantically congruent, or emotionally neutral and semantically incongruent. Relative to the words in the neutral-congruent condition, the words in the neutral-incongruent condition elicited a larger N400, indicating increased semantic processing, whereas the words in the negative-congruent condition elicited a long-lasting positivity between 300 and 1,000 ms, indicating an emotional response. The overlapping time windows of semantic processing and the emotional response suggest that the construction of emotional meaning operates concurrently with semantic unification. The results indicate that the implied emotional processing of sentences may be a result of unification operations but does not necessarily involve causal appraisal of a sentence’s mental representation.

Keywords

Emotion Unification N400 Language 

Supplementary material

13415_2018_652_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (646 kb)
ESM 1 (PDF 645 kb)

References

  1. Alvandi, E. O. (2016). A review on meanings of emotions: Steps to a neural-Informational notion of semantics. Cognitie, Creier, Comportament, 20, 45–63.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, M. (1960). Emotion and personality: Neurological and physiological aspects (Vol. 2). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., & Glickman, S. (2005). Attentional bias in anxiety: A behavioral and ERP study. Brain & Cognition, 59, 11–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2005.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett, L. F., Mesquita, B., & Gendron, M. (2011). Context in emotion perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 286–290.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411422522 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 364, 1281–1289.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.0319 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayer, M., Sommer, W., & Schacht, A. (2010). Reading emotional words within sentences: The impact of arousal and valence on event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 78, 299–307.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bayer, M., Sommer, W., & Schacht, A. (2012). P1 and beyond: Functional separation of multiple emotion effects in word recognition. Psychophysiology, 49, 959–969.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01381.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995). An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Computation, 7, 1129–1159.  https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Briesemeister, B. B., Kuchinke, L., & Jacobs, A. M. (2014). Emotion word recognition: Discrete information effects first, continuous later? Brain Research, 1564, 62–71.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2014.03.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cai, Q., & Brysbaert, M. (2010). Subtlex-ch: Chinese word and character frequencies based on film subtitles. PLoS ONE, 5, e10729.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carretie, L., Hinojosa, J. A., Albert, J., López-Martín, S., De La Gandara, B. S., Igoa, J. M., & Sotillo, M. (2008). Modulation of ongoing cognitive processes by emotionally intense words. Psychophysiology, 45, 188–196.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00617.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Citron, F. M. M. (2012). Neural correlates of written emotion word processing: A review of recent electrophysiological and hemodynamic neuroimaging studies. Brain and Language, 122, 211–226.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.12.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clore, G. L., & Ortony, A. (2013). Psychological construction in the OCC model of emotion. Emotion Review, 5, 335–343.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913489751 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Davis, M. H. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10(85).Google Scholar
  15. Delaney-Busch, N., & Kuperberg, G. (2013). Friendly drug-dealers and terrifying puppies: Affective primacy can attenuate the N400 effect in emotional discourse contexts. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 473–490.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-013-0159-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ding, J., Wang, L., & Yang, Y. (2015). The dynamic influence of emotional words on sentence processing. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15, 55–68.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0315-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ding, J., Wang, L., & Yang, Y. (2016). The dynamic influence of emotional words on sentence comprehension: An ERP study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 16, 433–446.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-016-0403-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ellsworth, P. C., & Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In R. J. Davidson, H. Goldsmith, & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 572–595). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Fischler, I., & Bradley, M. (2006). Event-related potential studies of language and emotion: Words, phrases, and task effects. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 185–203.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56009-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fritsch, N., & Kuchinke, L. (2013). Acquired affective associations induce emotion effects in word recognition: An ERP study. Brain and Language, 124, 75–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.12.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fugate, J. M. (2013). Categorical perception for emotional faces. Emotion Review, 5, 84–89.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912451350 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gendron, M., & Barrett, L. F. (2009). Reconstructing the past: A century of ideas about emotion in psychology. Emotion Review, 1, 316–339.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073909338877 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gendron, M., Lindquist, K. A., Barsalou, L., & Barrett, L. F. (2012). Emotion words shape emotion percepts. Emotion, 12, 314–325.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hagoort, P. (2005). On Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 416–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hagoort, P., & van Berkum, J. (2007). Beyond the sentence given. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 362, 801–811.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2089
  26. Hassin, R. R., Aviezer, H., & Bentin, S. (2013). Inherently ambiguous: Facial expressions of emotions, in context. Emotion Review, 5, 60–65.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912451331 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Herbert, C., Junghofer, M., & Kissler, J. (2008). Event related potentials to emotional adjectives during reading. Psychophysiology, 45, 487–498.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00638.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Herbert, C., Kissler, J., Junghöfer, M., Peyk, P., & Rockstroh, B. (2006). Processing of emotional adjectives: Evidence from startle EMG and ERPs. Psychophysiology, 43, 197–206.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00385.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hinojosa, J., Carretié, L., Valcárcel, M., Méndez-Bértolo, C., & Pozo, M. (2009). Electrophysiological differences in the processing of affective information in words and pictures. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 173–189.  https://doi.org/10.3758/cabn.9.2.173 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hinojosa, J. A., Méndez-Bértolo, C., & Pozo, M. A. (2010). Looking at emotional words is not the same as reading emotional words: Behavioral and neural correlates. Psychophysiology, 47, 748–757.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.00982.x Google Scholar
  31. Hinojosa, J. A., Méndez-Bértolo, C., & Pozo, M. A. (2012). High arousal words influence subsequent processing of neutral information: Evidence from event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 86, 143–151.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.06.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Holt, D. J., Lynn, S. K., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2009). Neurophysiological correlates of comprehending emotional meaning in context. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 2245–2262.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.21151 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jung, T. P., Makeig, S., Humphries, C., Lee, T. W., McKeown, M. J., Iragui, V., & Sejnowski, T. J. (2000). Removing electroencephalographic artifacts by blind source separation. Psychophysiology, 37, 163–178.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3720163 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kanske, P., & Kotz, S. A. (2007). Concreteness in emotional words: ERP evidence from a hemifield study. Brain Research, 1148, 138–148.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.044 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kissler, J., Assadollahi, R., & Herbert, C. (2006). Emotional and semantic networks in visual word processing: Insights from ERP studies. Progress in Brain Research, 156, 147–183.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-6123(06)56008-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kissler, J., & Herbert, C. (2013). Emotion, etmnooi, or emitoon?—Faster lexical access to emotional than to neutral words during reading. Biological Psychology, 92, 464–479.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.09.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kissler, J., Herbert, C., Winkler, I., & Junghofer, M. (2009). Emotion and attention in visual word processing—An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 80, 75–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.03.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kuchinke, L., Krause, B., Fritsch, N., & Briesemeister, B. B. (2014). A familiar font drives early emotional effects in word recognition. Brain and Language, 137, 142–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.08.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621–647.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207, 203–205.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7350657 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lai, V. T., Willems, R. M., & Hagoort, P. (2015). Feel between the lines: Implied emotion in sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27, 1528–1541.  https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00798 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Larson, F. (2017). Psychopathy, empathic Concern, and emotional sentence processing: An N400 ERP study (Ph.D. dissertation). New York, NY: City University of New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9, 920–933.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2532 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. LeDoux, J. E. (2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155–184.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.23.1.155 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Li, S., Jiang, X., Yu, H., & Zhou, X. (2014). Cognitive empathy modulates the processing of pragmatic constraints during sentence comprehension. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 1166–1174.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst091 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lindquist, K. A. (2013). Emotions emerge from more basic psychological ingredients: A modern psychological constructionist model. Emotion Review, 5, 356–368.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073913489750 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lindquist, K. A., Barrett, L. F., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Russell, J. A. (2006). Language and the perception of emotion. Emotion, 6, 125–138.  https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.125 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lindquist, K. A., & Gendron, M. (2013). What’s in a word? Language constructs emotion perception. Emotion Review, 5, 66–71.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073912451351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164, 177–190.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Martín-Loeches, M., Fernández, A., Schacht, A., Sommer, W., Casado, P., Jiménez-Ortega, L., & Fondevila, S. (2012). The influence of emotional words on sentence processing: Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3262–3272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Moreno, E. M., & Rivera, I. C. (2013). Setbacks, pleasant surprises and the simply unexpected: Brainwave responses in a language comprehension task. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9, 991–999.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst066 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moreno, E. M., & Vázquez, C. (2011). Will the glass be half full or half empty? Brain potentials and emotional expectations. Biological Psychology, 88, 131–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.07.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Okon-Singer, H., Lichtenstein-Vidne, L., & Cohen, N. (2013). Dynamic modulation of emotional processing. Biological Psychology, 92, 480–491.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.05.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J. M. (2011). FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, 156869.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/156869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Ortony, A., Clore, G., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Parkes, L., Perry, C., & Goodin, P. (2016). Examining the N400m in affectively negative sentences: A magnetoencephalography study. Psychophysiology, 53, 689–704.  https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pinheiro, A. P., Dias, M., Pedrosa, J., & Soares, A. P. (2016). Minho Affective Sentences (MAS): Probing the roles of sex, mood, and empathy in affective ratings of verbal stimuli. Behavior Research Methods, 49, 698–716.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0726-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pylkkänen, L., & Marantz, A. (2003). Tracking the time course of word recognition with MEG. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 187–189.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00092-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Roseman, I. J., & Smith, C. A. (2001). Appraisal theory: Overview, assumptions, varieties, controversies. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 3–19). New York: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
  60. Rutherford, E., MacLeod, C., & Campbell, L. (2004). BRIEF REPORT Negative selectivity effects and emotional selectivity effects in anxiety: Differential attentional correlates of state and trait variables. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 711–720.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930341000121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sass, S. M., Heller, W., Stewart, J. L., Silton, R. L., Edgar, J. C., Fisher, J. E., & Miller, G. A. (2010). Time course of attentional bias in anxiety: Emotion and gender specificity. Psychophysiology, 47, 247–259.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00926.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schacht, A., & Sommer, W. (2009). Emotions in word and face processing: Early and late cortical responses. Brain and Cognition, 69, 538–550.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2008.11.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schwarz-Friesel, M. (2015). Language and emotion: The cognitive linguistic perspective. In U. M. Lüdtke (Ed.), Emotion in language: Theory-research-application (pp. 157–173). Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Scott, G. G., O’Donnell, P. J., Leuthold, H., & Sereno, S. C. (2009). Early emotion word processing: Evidence from event-related potentials. Biological Psychology, 80, 95–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2008.03.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R., Vagg, P., & Jacobs, G. (1983). Manual for the State–Trait Anxiety Scale. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  66. Trauer, S. M., Kotz, S. A., & Müller, M. M. (2015). Emotional words facilitate lexical but not early visual processing. BMC Neuroscience, 16, 89.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12868-015-0225-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wang, L., & Bastiaansen, M. (2014). Oscillatory brain dynamics associated with the automatic processing of emotion in words. Brain and Language, 137, 120–129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.07.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang, L., Bastiaansen, M., & Yang, Y. (2015). The influence of emotional salience on the integration of person names into context. Brain Research, 1609, 82–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2015.03.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wang, L., Bastiaansen, M., Yang, Y., & Hagoort, P. (2013a). ERP evidence on the interaction between information structure and emotional salience of words. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 13, 297–310.  https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-012-0146-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wang, L., Zhu, Z., Bastiaansen, M., Hagoort, P., & Yang, Y. (2013b). Recognizing the emotional valence of names: An ERP study. Brain and Language, 125, 118–127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.006 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Willems, R. M., Clevis, K., & Hagoort, P. (2011). Add a picture for suspense: Neural correlates of the interaction between language and visual information in the perception of fear. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6, 404–416.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsq050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Barrett, L. F., Simmons, W. K., & Barsalou, L. W. (2011). Grounding emotion in situated conceptualization. Neuropsychologia, 49, 1105–1127.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.12.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zajonc, R. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zajonc, R. 2000. Feeling and thinking: Closing the debate over the independence of affect. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.), Feeling and thinking: The role of affect in social cognition. Studies in emotion and social interaction (Vol. 2, pp. 31–58). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Zhang, D., He, W., Wang, T., Luo, W., Zhu, X., Gu, R., … Luo, Y. (2014). Three stages of emotional word processing: An ERP study with rapid serial visual presentation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12, 1987–1903.  https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nst188 Google Scholar
  76. Zwaan, R. A. (2004). The immersed experiencer: Toward an embodied theory of language comprehension. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 44, pp. 35–62). New York: Academic Press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(03)44002-4 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of PsychologyChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyUniversity of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyTufts UniversityMassachusettsUSA
  4. 4.Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General HospitalHarvard Medical SchoolCharlestownUSA

Personalised recommendations