Automatic motor activation by mere instruction
- 290 Downloads
Previous behavioral studies have shown that instructions about stimulus–response (S-R) mappings can influence task performance even when these instructions are irrelevant for the current task. In the present study, we tested whether automatic effects of S–R instructions occur because the instructed stimuli automatically activate their corresponding responses. We registered the lateralized readiness potentials (LRPs) that were evoked by the instructed stimuli while participants were performing a task for which those mappings were irrelevant. Instructed S–R mappings clearly affected task performance in electrophysiological and behavioral measures. The LRP was found to deflect in the direction of the response tendency that corresponded with the instructed S–R mapping. Early activation of the instructed response was observed but occurred predominantly on slow trials. In contrast, response conflict evoked by instructed S–R mappings did not modulate the N2 amplitude. The results strongly suggest that, like experienced S–R mappings, instructed S–R mappings can lead to automatic response activation, but possibly via a different route.
KeywordsLearning Instruction Erp Cognitive control Working memory
Preparation of this article was supported by Grant BOF/GOA2006/001 and Grant BOF09/01 M00209 from Ghent University. We would like to thank Helen Tibboel for her valuable assistance in collecting data during this study.
- Cohen-Kdoshay, O., & Meiran, N. (2007). The representation of instructions in working memory leads to autonomous response activation: Evidence from the first trials in the flanker paradigm. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1140–1154.Google Scholar
- Eimer, M. (1995). Stimulus–response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 21, 837–854.Google Scholar
- Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C.W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.Google Scholar
- Liefooghe, B., Wenke, D., & De Houwer, J. (2012). Instruction-based task-rule congruency effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 38, 1325–1335.Google Scholar
- Luck, S. J. (2005). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Muggeo, V. M. R. (2008). Segmented: An R package to fit regression models with broken-line relationships. R News, 8, 20–25.Google Scholar
- Requin, J. (1985). Looking forward to move soon: Ante factum selective processes in motor control. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance X (pp. 147–167). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Smulders, F. T. Y., & Miller, J. O. (2012). The lateralized readiness potential. In S. J. Luck & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), Oxford handbook of event-related potential components. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar