Sticking with the nice guy: Trait warmth information impairs learning and modulates person perception brain network activity
Social learning requires inferring social information about another person, as well as evaluating outcomes. Previous research shows that prior social information biases decision making and reduces reliance on striatal activity during learning (Delgado, Frank, & Phelps, Nature Neuroscience 8 (11): 1611-1618, 2005). A rich literature in social psychology on person perception demonstrates that people spontaneously infer social information when viewing another person (Fiske & Taylor, 2013) and engage a network of brain regions, including the medial prefrontal cortex, temporal parietal junction, superior temporal sulcus, and precuneus (Amodio & Frith, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(4), 268-277, 2006; Haxby, Gobbini, & Montgomery, 2004; van Overwalle Human Brain Mapping, 30, 829–858, 2009). We investigate the role of these brain regions during social learning about well-established dimensions of person perception—trait warmth and trait competence. We test the hypothesis that activity in person perception brain regions interacts with learning structures during social learning. Participants play an investment game where they must choose an agent to invest on their behalf. This choice is guided by cues signaling trait warmth or trait competence based on framing of monetary returns. Trait warmth information impairs learning about human but not computer agents, while trait competence information produces similar learning rates for human and computer agents. We see increased activation to warmth information about human agents in person perception brain regions. Interestingly, activity in person perception brain regions during the decision phase negatively predicts activity in the striatum during feedback for trait competence inferences about humans. These results suggest that social learning may engage additional processing within person perception brain regions that hampers learning in economic contexts.
KeywordsSocial learning Person perception Social cognition Trait warmth/competence
Funding for this project was provided by startup funds given to L.T.H. by Duke University. We would like to thank those who provided helpful comments on early versions of this project at the Social and Affective Neuroscience Society conference (2012), including Mauricio Delgado.
Competing Financial Interests
The authors declare no competing financial interests.
- Bernheim, B. D., & Rangel, A. (2004). Addiction and cue-triggered decision processes. American Economic Review, 1558–1590Google Scholar
- Brown, E. C., & Brüne, M. (2012). The role of prediction in social neuroscience. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 1–19.Google Scholar
- Fiske, S. T. (1998). Stereotypes, prejudice, and discrimination. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), 4th ed (Handbook of Social Psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 357–411). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture (2/e). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hare, T. A., Camerer, C. F., Knoepfle, D. T., O'Doherty, J. P., & Rangel, A. (2010). Value computations in ventral medial prefrontal cortex during charitable decision making incorporate input from regions involved in social cognition. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(2), 583–590.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Harris, L. T., Lee, V. K., Capestany, B. H., Cohen, A. O. (2014). Assigning economic value to people results in dehumanization brain response. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics.Google Scholar
- Haxby, J. V., Gobbini, M. I., & Montgomery, K. (2004). Spatial and temporal distribution of face and object representations in the human brain. In M. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 889–904). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988). Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. 3-dimensional proportional system: an approach to cerebral imaging. New York: Thieme Medical publishers.Google Scholar
- Tausch, N., Kenworthy, J. B., & Hewstone, M. (2007). The confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts revisited: Does content matter? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(3), 542.Google Scholar
- Zilbovicius, M., Saitovitch, A., Popa, T., Rechtman, E., Diamandis, L., Chabane, N., & Boddaert, N. (2013). Autism, social cognition and superior temporal sulcus.Google Scholar